Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 14.4 (14.0, 14.8) N/A 1,024 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.4, 18.3) 60 (9, 60) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.7)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.2, 16.4) 59 (10, 60) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.1, 9.4)
Itasca County 2 Rural 11.7 (8.3, 16.3) 58 (10, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.8)
Steele County 2 Rural 11.7 (7.9, 17.0) 57 (7, 60) 6
*
*
Carver County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.5, 15.6) 56 (12, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.3)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.7, 17.0) 55 (8, 60) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 6.0)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 12.4 (7.2, 20.1) 54 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend 6.7 (-5.6, 32.1)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 12.5 (9.1, 16.9) 53 (7, 60) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 7.8)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.5, 16.5) 52 (10, 60) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.2, 6.9)
Benton County 2 Urban 12.7 (8.5, 18.4) 51 (5, 60) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 7.1)
Becker County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.8, 18.4) 50 (5, 60) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 6.5)
Meeker County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.1, 20.3) 49 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Wright County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.6, 16.0) 48 (11, 59) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.9)
Carlton County 2 Urban 13.1 (8.9, 18.7) 47 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.2, 8.1)
Mower County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.1, 18.9) 46 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 13.4 (9.0, 19.5) 45 (4, 60) 6 falling falling trend -14.8 (-32.6, -2.7)
Chisago County 2 Urban 13.5 (9.9, 18.0) 44 (5, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 6.6)
Todd County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.7, 20.4) 43 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Stearns County 2 Urban 13.6 (11.3, 16.3) 42 (10, 58) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.3)
Clay County 2 Urban 13.6 (10.0, 18.2) 41 (5, 60) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.3, 7.8)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 13.7 (10.8, 17.4) 40 (6, 59) 16 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.1, 27.5)
Isanti County 2 Urban 13.9 (9.6, 19.6) 39 (3, 60) 7
*
*
Beltrami County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.7, 19.4) 38 (3, 60) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.2, 8.4)
Brown County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.1, 20.8) 37 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Hennepin County 2 Urban 14.0 (13.1, 14.9) 36 (19, 48) 202 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.2, 3.1)
Waseca County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.0, 23.0) 35 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 6.7)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 14.1 (8.9, 21.7) 34 (2, 60) 5
*
*
Houston County 2 Urban 14.2 (8.4, 23.0) 33 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Dakota County 2 Urban 14.2 (12.8, 15.8) 32 (13, 51) 73 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.5)
Redwood County 2 Rural 14.4 (7.9, 24.5) 31 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Rice County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.8, 18.8) 30 (4, 59) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 5.2)
Winona County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.5, 19.4) 29 (3, 60) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 8.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 14.5 (12.6, 16.5) 28 (10, 52) 47 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.3, 4.7)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 14.6 (9.8, 20.9) 27 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Dodge County 2 Urban 14.6 (8.8, 23.1) 26 (1, 60) 4
*
*
McLeod County 2 Rural 14.7 (10.3, 20.5) 25 (2, 60) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.4, 8.7)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 14.7 (13.4, 16.2) 24 (12, 47) 91 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 4.0)
Nobles County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.1, 23.1) 23 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.8, 22.4) 22 (2, 60) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 8.2)
Renville County 2 Rural 15.0 (8.8, 24.7) 21 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 15.1 (9.9, 22.3) 20 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Scott County 2 Urban 15.2 (12.3, 18.5) 19 (4, 55) 21 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 5.0)
Morrison County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.9, 21.4) 18 (2, 59) 8 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.2, 9.0)
Cass County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.9, 21.7) 17 (2, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.6)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 15.6 (13.6, 17.9) 16 (6, 47) 45 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.9, 13.8)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 15.7 (12.4, 19.9) 15 (3, 56) 17 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.1, 10.0)
Douglas County 2 Rural 15.9 (11.5, 21.7) 14 (2, 59) 10 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.0, 12.9)
Anoka County 2 Urban 16.0 (14.3, 17.9) 13 (5, 40) 67 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.7, 5.0)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 16.1 (13.6, 18.8) 12 (4, 48) 32 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.5)
Pine County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.4, 22.9) 11 (1, 59) 8 stable stable trend -9.3 (-32.7, 1.1)
Sibley County 2 Rural 16.9 (9.8, 27.8) 10 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.6, 27.7) 9 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Lyon County 2 Rural 17.7 (11.6, 26.0) 8 (1, 60) 6 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.5, 9.9)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.7, 24.1) 7 (1, 53) 11
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural 18.7 (10.2, 32.7) 6 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Hubbard County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.6, 27.4) 5 (1, 58) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.0, 10.4)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 18.8 (10.3, 32.2) 4 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 19.3 (13.4, 27.2) 3 (1, 56) 7
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban 21.9 (12.3, 37.1) 2 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Koochiching County 2 Rural 27.5 (18.0, 41.5) 1 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 1:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top