Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 2 N/A 14.9 (14.5, 15.3) N/A 1,163 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.2, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Bayfield County 2 Rural 10.6 (6.2, 18.6) 66 (7, 66) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural 10.9 (7.1, 16.5) 65 (10, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.7)
Monroe County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.5, 15.7) 64 (13, 66) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.8, 4.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 11.4 (6.7, 18.6) 63 (3, 66) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.8)
La Crosse County 2 Urban 11.6 (9.3, 14.4) 62 (25, 66) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Taylor County 2 Rural 11.9 (6.9, 19.6) 61 (3, 66) 4
*
*
Barron County 2 Rural 12.1 (8.8, 16.4) 60 (10, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.8, 4.3)
Pierce County 2 Urban 12.5 (8.3, 18.1) 59 (5, 66) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 7.5)
Manitowoc County 2 Rural 12.5 (9.8, 15.9) 58 (13, 66) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Richland County 2 Rural 12.8 (7.3, 21.5) 57 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Vernon County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.7, 19.1) 56 (3, 66) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 6.3)
Columbia County 2 Urban 13.1 (9.8, 17.2) 55 (7, 66) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
St. Croix County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.3, 16.9) 54 (9, 66) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.4)
Wood County 2 Rural 13.3 (10.5, 16.8) 53 (9, 66) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.1)
Price County 2 Rural 13.4 (8.0, 22.9) 52 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.7, 4.3)
Rock County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.3, 16.0) 51 (13, 64) 28 stable stable trend -2.3 (-12.6, 1.0)
Langlade County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.2, 21.8) 50 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.2)
Winnebago County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.4, 16.0) 49 (12, 64) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Outagamie County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.5, 15.9) 48 (13, 63) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.8)
Dodge County 2 Rural 13.5 (10.8, 16.9) 47 (7, 65) 17 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 5.1)
Burnett County 2 Rural 13.6 (8.3, 22.4) 46 (1, 66) 5 falling falling trend -7.3 (-20.2, -1.7)
Sawyer County 2 Rural 13.8 (8.8, 21.8) 45 (2, 66) 5
*
*
Kenosha County 2 Urban 13.9 (11.6, 16.4) 44 (11, 63) 29 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.3)
Dunn County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.8, 19.4) 43 (2, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.4, 3.2)
Marathon County 2 Urban 14.0 (11.7, 16.6) 42 (10, 63) 27 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.1)
Crawford County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.6, 22.6) 41 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 6.6)
Waushara County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.3, 21.4) 40 (2, 66) 6 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 6.9)
Green County 2 Urban 14.3 (10.0, 19.9) 39 (2, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 14.4 (12.0, 17.2) 38 (8, 63) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.2)
Waupaca County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.9, 18.8) 37 (4, 65) 12 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 7.0)
Marinette County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.8, 19.3) 36 (3, 66) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 5.4)
Washburn County 2 Rural 14.5 (9.1, 23.3) 35 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 5.3)
Calumet County 2 Urban 14.6 (10.7, 19.5) 34 (2, 65) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 6.6)
Grant County 2 Rural 14.7 (10.7, 19.8) 33 (2, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.3)
Polk County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.9, 19.8) 32 (2, 65) 11
*
*
Waukesha County 2 Urban 14.9 (13.5, 16.4) 31 (12, 53) 88 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.4)
Brown County 2 Urban 15.0 (13.1, 17.1) 30 (9, 56) 48 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 4.9)
Iowa County 2 Urban 15.0 (9.5, 22.8) 29 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.5)
Eau Claire County 2 Urban 15.0 (12.1, 18.5) 28 (4, 62) 19 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.9)
Racine County 2 Urban 15.1 (12.9, 17.4) 27 (7, 57) 38 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.3)
Walworth County 2 Rural 15.1 (12.3, 18.4) 26 (4, 62) 22 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.7, 6.1)
Dane County 2 Urban 15.1 (13.7, 16.6) 25 (11, 51) 92 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.6)
Door County 2 Rural 15.3 (10.7, 21.7) 24 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.8)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 15.7 (12.5, 19.5) 23 (2, 61) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 4.4)
Sheboygan County 2 Urban 15.8 (13.2, 18.9) 22 (4, 58) 27 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.4)
Portage County 2 Rural 16.0 (12.5, 20.4) 21 (2, 62) 14 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.0, 8.3)
Oneida County 2 Rural 16.2 (12.3, 21.5) 20 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.5)
Milwaukee County 2 Urban 16.2 (15.1, 17.4) 19 (7, 38) 168 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Chippewa County 2 Urban 16.5 (12.9, 20.9) 18 (1, 61) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.3)
Fond du Lac County 2 Urban 16.6 (13.6, 20.1) 17 (2, 56) 23 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.1, 7.0)
Ozaukee County 2 Urban 16.8 (13.9, 20.2) 16 (2, 55) 24 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.9)
Oconto County 2 Urban 16.9 (12.4, 22.6) 15 (1, 64) 11 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.0, 7.3)
Clark County 2 Rural 16.9 (11.8, 23.5) 14 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.3)
Shawano County 2 Rural 17.0 (12.7, 22.4) 13 (1, 62) 11 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.6, 8.4)
Kewaunee County 2 Urban 17.0 (10.9, 25.9) 12 (1, 66) 5
*
*
Vilas County 2 Rural 17.1 (11.3, 25.5) 11 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.0, 5.8)
Douglas County 2 Urban 17.1 (12.7, 22.7) 10 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 7.2)
Ashland County 2 Rural 17.2 (10.4, 27.4) 9 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Sauk County 2 Rural 17.3 (13.6, 21.9) 8 (1, 59) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.1, 2.4)
Rusk County 2 Rural 17.4 (9.8, 29.3) 7 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural 17.8 (12.6, 25.8) 6 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 18.2 (11.5, 27.9) 5 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 6.8)
Trempealeau County 2 Rural 19.3 (13.4, 27.0) 4 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.4, 6.8)
Juneau County 2 Rural 19.5 (13.7, 27.1) 3 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.4)
Green Lake County 2 Rural 19.6 (12.9, 29.2) 2 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Marquette County 2 Rural 21.9 (14.3, 33.1) 1 (1, 61) 6
*
*
Buffalo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 4:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top