Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 13.8 (13.5, 14.2) N/A 1,108 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.7, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Oregon County 2 Rural 24.2 (13.2, 41.8) 1 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Linn County 2 Rural 20.5 (12.2, 33.3) 2 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Wright County 2 Rural 19.4 (12.6, 29.0) 3 (1, 65) 5
*
*
St. Francois County 2 Rural 18.7 (14.8, 23.4) 4 (1, 43) 16 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.9)
Adair County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.7, 25.8) 5 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 16.8 (10.3, 26.4) 6 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Ozark County 2 Rural 16.8 (9.5, 30.7) 7 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Hickory County 2 Rural 16.6 (9.6, 30.9) 8 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Urban 16.6 (11.7, 23.0) 9 (1, 64) 8 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.2, 6.3)
Boone County 2 Urban 16.4 (13.8, 19.4) 10 (3, 47) 29 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.6)
Pettis County 2 Rural 16.3 (11.8, 22.1) 11 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend -19.0 (-35.7, 2.8)
Henry County 2 Rural 16.2 (10.6, 24.2) 12 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.6, 9.2)
Crawford County 2 Rural 16.2 (10.7, 24.0) 13 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.8, 4.9)
Taney County 2 Rural 16.1 (12.4, 20.8) 14 (2, 59) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 8.3)
Perry County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.8, 25.3) 15 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.0, 19.2) 16 (3, 53) 23 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.5, 6.6)
Macon County 2 Rural 15.6 (8.7, 26.1) 17 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural 15.4 (11.1, 20.9) 18 (2, 66) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 15.3 (11.3, 20.3) 19 (2, 63) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.9)
Marion County 2 Rural 15.3 (10.3, 22.1) 20 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban 15.2 (10.5, 21.4) 21 (1, 66) 7
*
*
St. Louis City 2 Urban 15.1 (13.3, 17.2) 22 (7, 50) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 15.1 (8.9, 24.2) 23 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Benton County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.2, 22.6) 24 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.3, 9.9)
Scott County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.6, 20.7) 25 (2, 66) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 7.3)
Dallas County 2 Urban 14.9 (8.7, 24.5) 26 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.7, 4.9)
Howell County 2 Rural 14.9 (10.6, 20.5) 27 (2, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 5.0)
Dunklin County 2 Rural 14.7 (9.8, 21.6) 28 (1, 68) 6 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.9, 8.3)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 14.7 (11.5, 18.4) 29 (4, 62) 16 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 6.5)
Ray County 2 Urban 14.6 (9.4, 22.1) 30 (1, 68) 5 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 8.7)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 14.5 (8.2, 24.0) 31 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Urban 14.4 (12.4, 16.7) 32 (8, 55) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.3)
Christian County 2 Urban 14.4 (11.4, 18.0) 33 (4, 62) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.3)
Clay County 2 Urban 14.4 (12.4, 16.6) 34 (8, 56) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.1)
Jackson County 2 Urban 14.3 (13.1, 15.5) 35 (15, 48) 120 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.7, 2.5)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 14.1 (13.2, 15.0) 36 (17, 48) 192 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.2)
Andrew County 2 Urban 13.8 (8.1, 22.5) 37 (1, 68) 4
*
*
St. Charles County 2 Urban 13.7 (12.3, 15.3) 38 (15, 54) 71 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 3.1)
Cedar County 2 Rural 13.7 (7.6, 23.6) 39 (1, 68) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.6, 7.6)
Polk County 2 Urban 13.7 (9.2, 19.9) 40 (2, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.1, 4.6)
Cole County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.0, 16.9) 41 (7, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.1)
Jasper County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.6, 16.1) 42 (10, 63) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Randolph County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.0, 20.3) 43 (2, 68) 4
*
*
Miller County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.2, 20.0) 44 (2, 68) 5
*
*
Audrain County 2 Rural 12.9 (8.0, 20.0) 45 (2, 68) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.2)
Cass County 2 Urban 12.9 (10.3, 15.9) 46 (12, 65) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.3)
Greene County 2 Urban 12.7 (11.1, 14.5) 47 (19, 61) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5)
Stone County 2 Rural 12.7 (9.0, 18.1) 48 (6, 68) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.9)
McDonald County 2 Rural 12.7 (7.6, 20.3) 49 (2, 68) 4
*
*
Cooper County 2 Urban 12.6 (7.1, 21.2) 50 (2, 68) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.7)
Clinton County 2 Urban 12.5 (7.1, 20.7) 51 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Webster County 2 Urban 12.5 (8.3, 18.0) 52 (4, 68) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.3, 17.6) 53 (4, 68) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.6)
Phelps County 2 Rural 12.1 (8.3, 17.1) 54 (7, 68) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.2, 9.1)
Platte County 2 Urban 11.9 (9.4, 15.0) 55 (13, 67) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.8)
Laclede County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.8, 17.6) 56 (5, 68) 6
*
*
Saline County 2 Rural 11.7 (6.7, 19.2) 57 (3, 68) 3
*
*
Camden County 2 Rural 11.3 (8.0, 15.8) 58 (11, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 3.0)
Butler County 2 Rural 11.2 (7.7, 15.9) 59 (10, 68) 7 stable stable trend -20.7 (-45.6, 6.2)
Newton County 2 Urban 11.2 (8.1, 15.1) 60 (13, 68) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.9, 7.0)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 10.7 (8.0, 14.0) 61 (20, 68) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 10.4 (5.9, 17.3) 62 (6, 68) 3
*
*
Callaway County 2 Urban 10.3 (7.0, 15.0) 63 (13, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.3, 6.2)
Morgan County 2 Rural 10.3 (6.2, 16.8) 64 (8, 68) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.9, 3.2)
Barry County 2 Rural 10.1 (6.7, 14.9) 65 (16, 68) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.3)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 9.6 (5.9, 15.1) 66 (13, 68) 4
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural 9.2 (5.2, 15.4) 67 (13, 68) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.9, 2.5)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 8.6 (4.9, 13.7) 68 (19, 68) 3 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.3, 0.3)
Atchison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chariton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dent County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gasconade County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mississippi County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moniteau County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
New Madrid County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pemiscot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 5:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top