Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 2 N/A 14.5 (14.2, 14.8) N/A 2,633 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Wyoming County 2 Urban 20.4 (14.1, 28.9) 1 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.8)
Juniata County 2 Rural 20.0 (13.9, 28.4) 2 (1, 62) 7 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.2, 10.2)
Schuylkill County 2 Rural 19.0 (16.4, 21.9) 3 (1, 28) 41 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.0, 5.0)
Fayette County 2 Urban 18.0 (15.4, 21.0) 4 (1, 39) 36 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.6)
Mifflin County 2 Rural 18.0 (13.7, 23.3) 5 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 7.0)
Susquehanna County 2 Rural 17.7 (13.4, 23.2) 6 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.7)
Luzerne County 2 Urban 17.3 (15.6, 19.1) 7 (2, 31) 83 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 3.0)
Northampton County 2 Urban 17.2 (15.5, 19.1) 8 (2, 34) 77 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.1, 3.0)
Northumberland County 2 Rural 16.8 (13.8, 20.3) 9 (1, 56) 24 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.6)
Warren County 2 Rural 16.7 (12.0, 22.8) 10 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 8.8)
Perry County 2 Urban 16.5 (12.3, 21.9) 11 (1, 63) 11 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 6.5)
Venango County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.6, 21.4) 12 (1, 62) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.5)
Huntingdon County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.5, 21.6) 13 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.7)
Berks County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.8, 17.9) 14 (4, 40) 93 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.9)
Snyder County 2 Rural 16.1 (11.5, 22.0) 15 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.0, 9.4)
Clinton County 2 Rural 15.9 (11.5, 21.8) 16 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.6)
Carbon County 2 Urban 15.9 (12.6, 20.0) 17 (1, 61) 17 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 5.2)
Lebanon County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.4, 18.6) 18 (2, 56) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.7)
Montour County 2 Rural 15.7 (9.7, 24.7) 19 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Beaver County 2 Urban 15.3 (13.2, 17.7) 20 (5, 57) 41 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.2 (11.6, 19.8) 21 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 15.2 (13.3, 17.3) 22 (5, 56) 48 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 2.9)
Allegheny County 2 Urban 15.2 (14.4, 16.0) 23 (12, 41) 272 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.9)
Dauphin County 2 Urban 15.0 (13.3, 17.0) 24 (7, 56) 56 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.4)
Clarion County 2 Rural 15.0 (10.7, 20.8) 25 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.7)
Bradford County 2 Rural 15.0 (11.6, 19.3) 26 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.5)
Bedford County 2 Rural 15.0 (11.4, 19.5) 27 (1, 64) 13 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.6, 8.7)
Columbia County 2 Rural 14.9 (11.5, 19.2) 28 (1, 64) 14 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.2, 4.7)
Philadelphia County 2 Urban 14.9 (14.1, 15.8) 29 (14, 44) 260 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Cambria County 2 Urban 14.8 (12.5, 17.4) 30 (4, 61) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.5)
Lycoming County 2 Urban 14.7 (12.1, 17.8) 31 (3, 63) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.0, 5.7)
Erie County 2 Urban 14.5 (12.8, 16.4) 32 (9, 60) 55 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.9)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 14.3 (12.5, 16.2) 33 (10, 60) 51 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.3)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 14.2 (13.2, 15.2) 34 (18, 54) 167 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 0.8)
Elk County 2 Rural 14.2 (10.0, 20.0) 35 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.7)
Franklin County 2 Urban 14.1 (11.9, 16.6) 36 (8, 63) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.7)
Lehigh County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.6, 15.6) 37 (13, 60) 68 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Tioga County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.1, 19.2) 38 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.3)
Potter County 2 Rural 14.0 (7.9, 23.6) 39 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Urban 13.9 (11.2, 17.2) 40 (5, 64) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.4)
Bucks County 2 Urban 13.8 (12.7, 14.9) 41 (20, 58) 130 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Lackawanna County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.9, 15.6) 42 (13, 62) 45 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.6)
Somerset County 2 Rural 13.7 (10.9, 17.0) 43 (5, 64) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 13.6 (11.5, 16.0) 44 (11, 63) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.8)
Westmoreland County 2 Urban 13.6 (12.2, 15.0) 45 (19, 61) 82 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Armstrong County 2 Urban 13.4 (10.3, 17.3) 46 (5, 64) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.9)
Crawford County 2 Rural 13.4 (10.7, 16.8) 47 (6, 64) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Delaware County 2 Urban 13.4 (12.2, 14.7) 48 (22, 61) 99 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
York County 2 Urban 13.3 (12.1, 14.7) 49 (21, 61) 83 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.7, -1.7)
Pike County 2 Rural 13.3 (10.3, 17.1) 50 (5, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.7)
Adams County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.8, 16.3) 51 (8, 64) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.4)
Fulton County 2 Rural 13.2 (7.7, 22.4) 52 (1, 64) 3 stable stable trend -5.7 (-25.7, 0.5)
Greene County 2 Rural 13.2 (9.1, 18.9) 53 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.5, 6.3)
Lancaster County 2 Urban 13.2 (12.0, 14.4) 54 (25, 62) 101 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.8)
Union County 2 Rural 13.1 (9.3, 18.1) 55 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.2, 8.3)
Mercer County 2 Rural 12.9 (10.6, 15.6) 56 (12, 64) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.6)
Chester County 2 Urban 12.8 (11.6, 14.1) 57 (28, 62) 88 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Indiana County 2 Rural 12.7 (10.0, 16.0) 58 (9, 64) 16 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.4, 17.7)
Butler County 2 Urban 12.4 (10.6, 14.4) 59 (22, 64) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 3.2)
Blair County 2 Urban 12.3 (10.1, 14.8) 60 (17, 64) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Clearfield County 2 Rural 11.6 (9.1, 14.8) 61 (16, 64) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-12.2, 1.0)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 11.5 (8.0, 16.4) 62 (8, 64) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 6.9)
Centre County 2 Urban 11.5 (9.3, 14.1) 63 (21, 64) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.5)
McKean County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.6, 15.9) 64 (8, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.0)
Cameron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 10:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top