Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 14.2 (13.8, 14.6) N/A 1,185 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.0, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.6, 24.2) 8 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend -16.2 (-31.1, 4.1)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.4, 18.9) 39 (3, 76) 10 falling falling trend -9.2 (-23.1, -0.7)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 13.9 (11.4, 16.7) 44 (9, 72) 23 falling falling trend -7.4 (-16.0, -0.7)
Scott County 2 Rural 9.5 (5.4, 15.9) 75 (10, 78) 3 falling falling trend -5.9 (-18.4, -1.8)
Allen County 2 Urban 13.7 (12.2, 15.4) 46 (17, 66) 60 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.0, 1.3)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 12.1 (10.1, 14.2) 67 (24, 75) 28 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.7, 0.3)
Gibson County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.5, 17.3) 71 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-17.0, 1.1)
Clark County 2 Urban 12.8 (10.3, 15.7) 56 (14, 75) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Jasper County 2 Urban 8.2 (5.1, 13.0) 77 (32, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 4.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 10.0 (5.9, 16.2) 74 (7, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.1, 4.6)
Clay County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.4, 19.5) 54 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.1, 3.8)
Porter County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.6, 16.2) 45 (11, 70) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 3.0)
LaGrange County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.9, 16.2) 73 (8, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.8, 21.8) 14 (1, 74) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.1)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.1, 15.4) 62 (14, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Miami County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.3, 16.5) 72 (8, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.5, 5.0)
Lake County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.7, 15.4) 42 (19, 63) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 12.6 (9.0, 17.3) 61 (6, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Steuben County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.4, 20.8) 30 (2, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 4.0)
Boone County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.6, 18.5) 38 (4, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.2)
Delaware County 2 Urban 12.4 (10.0, 15.4) 65 (15, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Hancock County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.2, 17.0) 50 (7, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)
Jennings County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.7, 19.4) 63 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 5.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 13.2 (10.9, 15.9) 51 (13, 73) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.0)
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.4 (12.0, 19.5) 23 (3, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 15.5 (11.9, 19.9) 20 (2, 71) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 14.7 (12.4, 17.3) 32 (7, 68) 29 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 15.3 (11.9, 19.4) 24 (3, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 5.2)
Harrison County 2 Urban 12.8 (8.7, 18.3) 55 (4, 78) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 5.0)
Orange County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.4, 22.3) 43 (1, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.5)
Posey County 2 Urban 12.7 (8.0, 19.7) 58 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.8, 6.2)
Whitley County 2 Urban 11.7 (7.6, 17.4) 69 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.8)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 12.6 (8.7, 18.0) 60 (6, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.7)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.1, 18.1) 36 (5, 74) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.9)
Franklin County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.0, 20.3) 53 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 6.1)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 15.4 (11.5, 20.5) 22 (2, 73) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7)
Marion County 2 Urban 15.0 (14.0, 16.2) 26 (13, 51) 149 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.4)
Decatur County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.6, 22.2) 28 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.0, 6.5)
Johnson County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.3, 14.9) 64 (19, 74) 24 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.7)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.7, 18.8) 11 (4, 47) 54 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.1)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 14.6 (12.9, 16.5) 33 (10, 63) 53 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.4)
Fayette County 2 Rural 15.0 (9.7, 22.7) 27 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.7, 22.8) 13 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.3)
Wabash County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.9, 18.8) 52 (4, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.4)
White County 2 Rural 12.7 (7.9, 19.6) 59 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.6)
Monroe County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.0, 19.1) 16 (3, 64) 23 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.4)
Shelby County 2 Urban 18.5 (14.0, 24.3) 6 (1, 65) 12 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Floyd County 2 Urban 14.9 (11.6, 18.8) 29 (4, 73) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.7, 6.0)
Henry County 2 Rural 16.0 (12.0, 21.2) 15 (2, 72) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 6.0)
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 15.1 (11.8, 19.2) 25 (3, 73) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 5.1)
Clinton County 2 Rural 14.0 (9.3, 20.5) 41 (2, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.0, 7.7)
Cass County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.8, 16.8) 70 (8, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.7)
Warrick County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.8, 18.4) 37 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 7.7)
Howard County 2 Urban 16.9 (13.6, 20.8) 10 (2, 65) 19 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 6.2)
Vigo County 2 Urban 15.6 (12.7, 19.0) 19 (4, 67) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.3, 5.0)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 15.7 (13.4, 18.2) 18 (4, 59) 37 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 5.7)
Dubois County 2 Rural 13.5 (9.5, 18.8) 48 (3, 77) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.7, 6.9)
Knox County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.6, 27.3) 3 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.6)
Tipton County 2 Urban 24.5 (16.0, 36.6) 1 (1, 67) 6 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 8.2)
Greene County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.6, 23.2) 12 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.5, 7.9)
Ripley County 2 Rural 19.2 (13.4, 26.8) 5 (1, 70) 8 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.3, 12.0)
Adams County 2 Rural 8.0 (4.7, 12.8) 78 (38, 78) 4
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural 17.1 (9.6, 29.1) 9 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban 12.8 (7.3, 22.0) 57 (2, 78) 3
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.9, 22.7) 35 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Daviess County 2 Rural 12.1 (7.7, 18.2) 66 (4, 78) 5
*
*
Fountain County 2 Rural 18.5 (11.7, 28.5) 7 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Huntington County 2 Rural 15.7 (11.1, 21.7) 17 (1, 76) 8
*
*
Jay County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.7, 24.0) 21 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural 8.3 (4.9, 13.5) 76 (29, 78) 4
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.2, 24.6) 34 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.3, 18.5) 49 (4, 78) 8
*
*
Owen County 2 Urban 13.6 (7.9, 22.0) 47 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 19.3 (11.0, 32.2) 4 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural 20.3 (11.6, 33.6) 2 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.5, 22.2) 31 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Spencer County 2 Rural 12.0 (6.7, 20.2) 68 (2, 78) 3
*
*
Starke County 2 Rural 14.1 (8.9, 21.6) 40 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 12:21 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top