Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 14.4 (14.0, 14.8) N/A 1,024 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Polk County 2 Urban 13.4 (9.0, 19.5) 45 (4, 60) 6 falling falling trend -14.8 (-32.6, -2.7)
Pine County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.4, 22.9) 11 (1, 59) 8 stable stable trend -9.3 (-32.7, 1.1)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.4, 18.3) 60 (9, 60) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.7)
Carver County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.5, 15.6) 56 (12, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.3)
Itasca County 2 Rural 11.7 (8.3, 16.3) 58 (10, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.8)
Scott County 2 Urban 15.2 (12.3, 18.5) 19 (4, 55) 21 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 5.0)
Waseca County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.0, 23.0) 35 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 6.7)
Stearns County 2 Urban 13.6 (11.3, 16.3) 42 (10, 58) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.3)
Becker County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.8, 18.4) 50 (5, 60) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 6.5)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.7, 17.0) 55 (8, 60) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 6.0)
Chisago County 2 Urban 13.5 (9.9, 18.0) 44 (5, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 6.6)
Cass County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.9, 21.7) 17 (2, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.6)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 16.1 (13.6, 18.8) 12 (4, 48) 32 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.5)
Wright County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.6, 16.0) 48 (11, 59) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.9)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 14.0 (13.1, 14.9) 36 (19, 48) 202 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.2, 3.1)
Rice County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.8, 18.8) 30 (4, 59) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 5.2)
Mower County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.1, 18.9) 46 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.5)
Carlton County 2 Urban 13.1 (8.9, 18.7) 47 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.2, 8.1)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 12.5 (9.1, 16.9) 53 (7, 60) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 7.8)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 14.7 (13.4, 16.2) 24 (12, 47) 91 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 4.0)
Dakota County 2 Urban 14.2 (12.8, 15.8) 32 (13, 51) 73 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.5)
Washington County 2 Urban 14.5 (12.6, 16.5) 28 (10, 52) 47 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.3, 4.7)
McLeod County 2 Rural 14.7 (10.3, 20.5) 25 (2, 60) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.4, 8.7)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.7, 19.4) 38 (3, 60) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.2, 8.4)
Benton County 2 Urban 12.7 (8.5, 18.4) 51 (5, 60) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 7.1)
Martin County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.8, 22.4) 22 (2, 60) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 8.2)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.5, 16.5) 52 (10, 60) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.2, 6.9)
Anoka County 2 Urban 16.0 (14.3, 17.9) 13 (5, 40) 67 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.7, 5.0)
Clay County 2 Urban 13.6 (10.0, 18.2) 41 (5, 60) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.3, 7.8)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.2, 16.4) 59 (10, 60) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.1, 9.4)
Winona County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.5, 19.4) 29 (3, 60) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 8.0)
Morrison County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.9, 21.4) 18 (2, 59) 8 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.2, 9.0)
Douglas County 2 Rural 15.9 (11.5, 21.7) 14 (2, 59) 10 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.0, 12.9)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 15.7 (12.4, 19.9) 15 (3, 56) 17 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.1, 10.0)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 15.6 (13.6, 17.9) 16 (6, 47) 45 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.9, 13.8)
Lyon County 2 Rural 17.7 (11.6, 26.0) 8 (1, 60) 6 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.5, 9.9)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.6, 27.4) 5 (1, 58) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.0, 10.4)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 13.7 (10.8, 17.4) 40 (6, 59) 16 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.1, 27.5)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 12.4 (7.2, 20.1) 54 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend 6.7 (-5.6, 32.1)
Brown County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.1, 20.8) 37 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 18.8 (10.3, 32.2) 4 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Dodge County 2 Urban 14.6 (8.8, 23.1) 26 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Houston County 2 Urban 14.2 (8.4, 23.0) 33 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Isanti County 2 Urban 13.9 (9.6, 19.6) 39 (3, 60) 7
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.6, 27.7) 9 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.7, 24.1) 7 (1, 53) 11
*
*
Koochiching County 2 Rural 27.5 (18.0, 41.5) 1 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural 18.7 (10.2, 32.7) 6 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 15.1 (9.9, 22.3) 20 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Meeker County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.1, 20.3) 49 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 19.3 (13.4, 27.2) 3 (1, 56) 7
*
*
Nicollet County 2 Urban 14.6 (9.8, 20.9) 27 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Nobles County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.1, 23.1) 23 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Redwood County 2 Rural 14.4 (7.9, 24.5) 31 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Renville County 2 Rural 15.0 (8.8, 24.7) 21 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban 21.9 (12.3, 37.1) 2 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Sibley County 2 Rural 16.9 (9.8, 27.8) 10 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Steele County 2 Rural 11.7 (7.9, 17.0) 57 (7, 60) 6
*
*
Todd County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.7, 20.4) 43 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Wabasha County 2 Urban 14.1 (8.9, 21.7) 34 (2, 60) 5
*
*
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 3:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top