Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 12.6 (12.1, 13.1) N/A 603 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Canadian County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.9, 14.9) 29 (6, 40) 20 falling falling trend -18.9 (-30.5, -4.6)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 11.9 (8.7, 15.8) 31 (5, 42) 10 stable stable trend -3.7 (-16.8, 0.2)
Rogers County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.5, 11.5) 42 (23, 42) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 1.0)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 11.2 (6.7, 18.4) 35 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.4, 3.4)
Seminole County 2 Rural 12.8 (7.8, 20.0) 22 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.1, 2.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 11.6 (7.5, 17.2) 34 (3, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.7)
Kay County 2 Rural 9.7 (6.6, 14.0) 40 (10, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.1)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 12.6 (7.9, 19.3) 25 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 2.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.3, 20.0) 27 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.8, 4.9)
Comanche County 2 Urban 13.0 (10.2, 16.2) 21 (4, 40) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Osage County 2 Urban 10.3 (7.2, 14.5) 39 (7, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.6)
Bryan County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.7, 18.7) 14 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.9)
Creek County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.3, 14.5) 37 (8, 42) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 13.9 (10.0, 18.9) 13 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.6)
Carter County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.5, 18.2) 18 (2, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.6)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 15.6 (10.9, 21.8) 7 (1, 40) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.0, 5.8)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 11.9 (10.8, 13.1) 30 (15, 36) 90 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 6.2)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 11.6 (8.1, 16.4) 33 (3, 42) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 5.4)
Mayes County 2 Rural 15.3 (10.9, 21.1) 10 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.2)
Garfield County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.4, 16.6) 26 (3, 42) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.9)
Delaware County 2 Rural 12.7 (9.3, 17.4) 23 (2, 42) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 5.1)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 10.5 (7.8, 13.9) 38 (10, 42) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.5)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 13.2 (12.1, 14.3) 20 (9, 32) 111 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Payne County 2 Rural 12.7 (9.4, 16.8) 24 (3, 42) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 8.9 (6.0, 12.7) 41 (16, 42) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 5.7)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.8, 18.5) 16 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.9)
Stephens County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.9, 18.4) 15 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.8)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 12.3 (10.6, 14.1) 28 (10, 38) 39 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 5.0)
Grady County 2 Urban 13.2 (9.6, 17.8) 19 (2, 42) 9 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.4)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 16.3 (11.0, 23.3) 4 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.8)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 14.3 (10.0, 20.0) 12 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 8.0)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 14.5 (11.2, 18.6) 11 (1, 38) 13 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.8, 9.8)
Marshall County 2 Rural 18.6 (10.9, 29.9) 2 (1, 42) 4 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.7, 10.7)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 15.6 (11.0, 21.6) 8 (1, 40) 8 rising rising trend 8.8 (2.3, 26.2)
Beckham County 2 Rural 13.5 (7.9, 21.8) 17 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Caddo County 2 Rural 15.8 (10.3, 23.5) 6 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural 18.8 (11.1, 30.5) 1 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Garvin County 2 Rural 15.4 (9.8, 23.0) 9 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Logan County 2 Urban 11.0 (7.6, 15.6) 36 (5, 42) 7
*
*
McClain County 2 Urban 11.7 (7.7, 17.1) 32 (2, 42) 6
*
*
Pawnee County 2 Urban 16.1 (9.2, 26.5) 5 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Woodward County 2 Rural 17.6 (10.9, 27.1) 3 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Adair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 8:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top