Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 13.2 (12.9, 13.6) N/A 1,144 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Wilson County 2 Urban 12.2 (10.0, 14.8) 63 (14, 74) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 4.5)
Williamson County 2 Urban 12.4 (10.6, 14.5) 59 (17, 73) 34 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 4.1)
White County 2 Rural 13.4 (8.9, 19.8) 40 (2, 76) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 5.7)
Weakley County 2 Rural 13.7 (9.2, 19.9) 36 (2, 76) 6
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban 14.7 (12.2, 17.5) 22 (5, 65) 27 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.9, 18.5) 50 (3, 76) 7 stable stable trend -9.5 (-40.5, 1.5)
Union County 2 Urban 16.8 (10.4, 26.1) 7 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 7.5)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 10.8 (6.1, 18.7) 75 (4, 76) 3
*
*
Tipton County 2 Urban 14.8 (10.9, 19.6) 20 (2, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.3)
Sumner County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.7, 16.1) 35 (9, 70) 33 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 4.0)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 12.4 (10.5, 14.7) 58 (16, 73) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 3.0)
Smith County 2 Urban 14.1 (8.3, 22.8) 29 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Shelby County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.9, 15.1) 33 (16, 55) 138 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 0.8)
Sevier County 2 Rural 11.8 (9.4, 14.8) 66 (13, 76) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.7)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.2, 24.3) 25 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 11.8 (6.8, 19.4) 67 (2, 76) 3
*
*
Rutherford County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.7, 14.5) 56 (18, 72) 38 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.4)
Robertson County 2 Urban 14.8 (11.3, 19.0) 21 (3, 73) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-9.2, 4.6)
Roane County 2 Urban 13.4 (10.1, 17.6) 42 (5, 75) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Rhea County 2 Rural 14.0 (9.6, 20.0) 32 (2, 76) 7 stable stable trend 5.3 (-3.3, 26.1)
Putnam County 2 Rural 15.2 (11.8, 19.4) 15 (2, 71) 14 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 6.1)
Overton County 2 Rural 15.6 (9.6, 24.1) 12 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 8.0)
Obion County 2 Rural 8.6 (5.2, 13.7) 76 (20, 76) 4 stable stable trend -19.3 (-50.6, 2.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 13.2 (8.0, 20.9) 47 (2, 76) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Urban 15.1 (12.5, 18.0) 17 (4, 66) 26 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 5.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 14.1 (10.3, 19.0) 31 (3, 75) 10 stable stable trend -4.8 (-19.9, 1.6)
McNairy County 2 Rural 14.1 (9.3, 21.0) 30 (2, 76) 6
*
*
McMinn County 2 Rural 12.4 (9.1, 16.5) 61 (7, 76) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.1)
Maury County 2 Urban 11.7 (9.1, 14.7) 68 (14, 76) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 17.1 (11.8, 24.0) 5 (1, 74) 7
*
*
Marion County 2 Urban 11.4 (7.2, 17.5) 71 (5, 76) 5 stable stable trend -9.2 (-35.9, 0.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 14.5 (11.6, 18.0) 24 (4, 71) 18 rising rising trend 10.8 (2.2, 21.2)
Loudon County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.0, 17.0) 49 (5, 75) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.6, 17.2) 69 (5, 76) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 13.1 (9.4, 18.1) 48 (4, 76) 8
*
*
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.5, 21.6) 34 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.5)
Knox County 2 Urban 12.6 (11.3, 14.0) 54 (24, 69) 72 stable stable trend -0.6 (-13.5, 2.9)
Johnson County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.9, 22.8) 26 (1, 76) 4 falling falling trend -31.7 (-50.1, -16.8)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 14.1 (10.6, 18.6) 28 (3, 75) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.6)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 12.0 (6.7, 20.4) 65 (2, 76) 3
*
*
Hickman County 2 Urban 18.4 (12.3, 26.8) 4 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 7.2)
Henry County 2 Rural 12.1 (8.1, 17.7) 64 (4, 76) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 5.3)
Henderson County 2 Rural 11.4 (7.1, 17.5) 70 (5, 76) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 6.2)
Haywood County 2 Rural 13.6 (8.0, 22.3) 37 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.1, 9.5)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 11.2 (8.2, 15.2) 73 (13, 76) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.1, 0.8)
Hardin County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.4, 23.8) 9 (1, 75) 7 rising rising trend 22.4 (2.2, 43.0)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 21.5 (14.8, 30.5) 2 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.3)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 12.7 (11.3, 14.3) 51 (20, 70) 62 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.4)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 15.3 (11.7, 19.6) 14 (2, 73) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 4.0)
Grundy County 2 Rural 23.6 (14.0, 37.6) 1 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 15.1 (11.9, 19.0) 16 (3, 71) 17 rising rising trend 8.3 (1.6, 23.5)
Grainger County 2 Urban 13.2 (8.4, 20.3) 46 (2, 76) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 5.1)
Giles County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.4, 21.0) 27 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 6.8)
Gibson County 2 Urban 16.1 (12.0, 21.3) 11 (1, 72) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.3, 6.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.4, 18.4) 45 (3, 76) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.8)
Fentress County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.5, 20.3) 57 (2, 76) 4
*
*
Fayette County 2 Urban 13.6 (9.8, 18.6) 39 (3, 76) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.5, 6.0)
Dyer County 2 Rural 17.0 (12.0, 23.5) 6 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.6, 6.0)
Dickson County 2 Urban 12.5 (8.9, 17.1) 55 (6, 76) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.5, 6.1)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 16.2 (10.2, 24.8) 10 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Davidson County 2 Urban 12.6 (11.5, 13.9) 53 (24, 69) 89 stable stable trend -0.7 (-11.5, 1.9)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 11.0 (8.4, 14.3) 74 (19, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.1)
Crockett County 2 Urban 21.4 (13.3, 33.3) 3 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Coffee County 2 Rural 13.6 (10.1, 18.0) 38 (4, 75) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.8)
Cocke County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.3, 18.8) 43 (3, 76) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.9)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.7, 23.3) 8 (1, 74) 8 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.0, 12.3)
Chester County 2 Urban 14.6 (8.4, 24.1) 23 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Cheatham County 2 Urban 12.4 (8.2, 18.1) 60 (3, 76) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 5.9)
Carter County 2 Urban 11.4 (8.4, 15.2) 72 (11, 76) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 12.3 (7.5, 19.2) 62 (2, 76) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.3, 7.1)
Campbell County 2 Urban 14.8 (10.7, 20.2) 19 (2, 75) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.1, 8.4)
Bradley County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.7, 16.4) 44 (7, 74) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 12.7 (10.5, 15.1) 52 (12, 74) 26 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 10.9)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 15.5 (8.9, 26.0) 13 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Bedford County 2 Rural 14.9 (10.6, 20.3) 18 (2, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.8)
Anderson County 2 Urban 13.4 (10.5, 17.0) 41 (6, 74) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.6)
Benton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 7:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top