Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 63.3 (62.3, 64.4) N/A 3,075 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Harper County 6 Rural 100.7 (63.8, 154.0) 1 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.6, 5.2)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 96.4 (79.2, 116.9) 2 (1, 38) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.7)
Haskell County 6 Rural 93.4 (74.0, 117.1) 3 (1, 51) 17 rising rising trend 8.2 (2.6, 20.1)
Johnston County 6 Rural 89.7 (68.7, 115.8) 4 (1, 57) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.8)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 89.5 (77.0, 103.6) 5 (1, 37) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Marshall County 6 Rural 88.5 (72.3, 107.7) 6 (1, 48) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.4)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 88.2 (62.5, 122.9) 7 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.5, 3.0)
Mayes County 6 Rural 86.5 (75.7, 98.6) 8 (1, 39) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Nowata County 6 Rural 86.4 (66.2, 111.8) 9 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.1)
Latimer County 6 Rural 86.3 (66.5, 111.2) 10 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.6)
Love County 6 Rural 85.4 (64.7, 111.2) 11 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.2)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 84.8 (73.8, 97.2) 12 (1, 41) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.0, -0.5)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 84.4 (73.8, 96.3) 13 (1, 40) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 84.0 (71.9, 97.8) 14 (1, 45) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 83.9 (69.8, 100.6) 15 (1, 50) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.1)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 83.7 (73.9, 94.5) 16 (2, 38) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 83.3 (73.3, 94.5) 17 (1, 40) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.9)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 82.0 (63.9, 104.5) 18 (1, 63) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.5)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 80.9 (72.7, 89.8) 19 (3, 40) 74 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 79.8 (61.3, 102.7) 20 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.4)
Kay County 6 Rural 79.7 (69.9, 90.7) 21 (3, 46) 49 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 8.5)
Creek County 6 Urban 78.5 (70.8, 86.9) 22 (5, 43) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 78.3 (70.1, 87.3) 23 (5, 44) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 77.9 (62.0, 97.3) 24 (1, 63) 17 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -1.3)
Grady County 6 Urban 73.6 (64.8, 83.3) 25 (8, 53) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 73.5 (62.9, 85.5) 26 (6, 56) 36 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Craig County 6 Rural 73.0 (57.7, 91.7) 27 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 72.6 (63.6, 82.7) 28 (8, 56) 48 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Beckham County 6 Rural 72.3 (58.1, 89.1) 29 (3, 67) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.7, 3.2)
Coal County 6 Rural 72.0 (48.3, 105.4) 30 (1, 73) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.9, -0.1)
Seminole County 6 Rural 71.9 (59.5, 86.4) 31 (4, 65) 24 stable stable trend 8.3 (-1.1, 14.1)
Murray County 6 Rural 71.2 (55.2, 90.8) 32 (2, 69) 14 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.1)
Bryan County 6 Rural 71.1 (61.8, 81.5) 33 (9, 57) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Comanche County 6 Urban 70.0 (63.5, 77.0) 34 (17, 53) 87 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Dewey County 6 Rural 70.0 (44.2, 107.5) 35 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.4, 7.0)
Adair County 6 Rural 69.8 (55.9, 86.4) 36 (4, 68) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Atoka County 6 Rural 69.7 (54.0, 89.0) 37 (2, 70) 14 stable stable trend -5.9 (-23.6, 0.6)
Cotton County 6 Urban 69.6 (46.5, 102.1) 38 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.3)
Washington County 6 Rural 69.3 (61.0, 78.5) 39 (14, 58) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Hughes County 6 Rural 68.7 (52.7, 88.6) 40 (4, 70) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.1)
Washita County 6 Rural 67.8 (50.1, 90.2) 41 (2, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.7, 3.1)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 66.7 (47.7, 91.8) 42 (2, 73) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 1.7)
Rogers County 6 Urban 65.5 (59.1, 72.5) 43 (24, 60) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Caddo County 6 Rural 65.4 (53.7, 79.0) 44 (11, 69) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Garvin County 6 Rural 64.8 (53.2, 78.5) 45 (12, 69) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.2)
Carter County 6 Rural 64.2 (55.6, 74.0) 46 (21, 67) 41 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Noble County 6 Rural 64.2 (48.1, 84.8) 47 (5, 72) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.6)
Ellis County 6 Rural 64.1 (38.6, 103.5) 48 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend -6.4 (-50.5, 7.8)
McClain County 6 Urban 63.8 (54.2, 74.8) 49 (17, 68) 32 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Stephens County 6 Rural 62.4 (54.0, 72.0) 50 (24, 68) 41 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.1)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural 62.0 (40.4, 93.1) 51 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.7, 2.1)
Payne County 6 Rural 61.9 (54.2, 70.4) 52 (27, 67) 49 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Logan County 6 Urban 61.3 (52.7, 70.9) 53 (24, 68) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 61.0 (51.7, 71.7) 54 (23, 70) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Delaware County 6 Rural 59.1 (51.3, 68.0) 55 (31, 69) 44 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Osage County 6 Urban 58.6 (50.8, 67.5) 56 (30, 69) 42 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 58.0 (51.6, 65.0) 57 (37, 69) 62 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.7)
Roger Mills County 6 Rural 56.8 (32.3, 96.7) 58 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Garfield County 6 Urban 56.2 (48.9, 64.3) 59 (36, 70) 44 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 55.3 (53.0, 57.6) 60 (50, 67) 475 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 54.8 (52.4, 57.3) 61 (51, 68) 415 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Canadian County 6 Urban 53.9 (48.8, 59.3) 62 (46, 70) 87 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 53.8 (50.2, 57.6) 63 (49, 70) 171 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Jackson County 6 Rural 53.1 (42.0, 66.4) 64 (30, 73) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.6)
Custer County 6 Rural 51.5 (40.8, 64.2) 65 (33, 74) 16 falling falling trend -13.1 (-32.8, -3.5)
Blaine County 6 Rural 51.1 (34.8, 73.3) 66 (16, 74) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 0.2)
Greer County 6 Rural 50.5 (30.2, 80.7) 67 (6, 74) 4 stable stable trend -14.3 (-47.8, 1.7)
Woods County 6 Rural 49.4 (32.2, 73.4) 68 (16, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Woodward County 6 Rural 48.5 (37.2, 62.5) 69 (36, 74) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.1, 1.2)
Major County 6 Rural 43.6 (28.2, 65.6) 70 (32, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.5)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 42.3 (30.5, 57.5) 71 (41, 74) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.9)
Tillman County 6 Rural 40.3 (25.1, 62.9) 72 (33, 74) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.2, -1.0)
Beaver County 6 Rural 38.8 (22.1, 65.9) 73 (27, 74) 3
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural 38.6 (27.7, 52.4) 74 (53, 74) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -1.0)
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cimarron, Grant, Harmon

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top