Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 61.1 (59.6, 62.5) N/A 1,512 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 54.0 (53.7, 54.3) N/A 23,578 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 39.0 (26.9, 55.0) 68 (34, 68) 7 falling falling trend -17.1 (-40.1, -0.6)
Nash County 2 Urban 43.4 (35.4, 52.9) 67 (43, 68) 22 falling falling trend -9.7 (-16.5, -5.9)
Chatham County 2 Urban 46.8 (32.6, 66.7) 66 (14, 68) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 1.1)
Duplin County 2 Rural 48.2 (34.9, 65.6) 65 (15, 68) 9 falling falling trend -7.3 (-21.1, -2.3)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 48.4 (27.5, 81.0) 64 (4, 68) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.3)
Bertie County 2 Rural 48.8 (33.7, 69.0) 63 (10, 68) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.3)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 50.1 (38.1, 64.9) 62 (17, 68) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 0.9)
Johnston County 2 Urban 50.5 (39.6, 63.2) 61 (20, 68) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.2)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 50.7 (31.2, 78.9) 60 (5, 68) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 4.1)
Pender County 2 Urban 53.0 (36.6, 75.2) 59 (7, 68) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.3)
Carteret County 2 Rural 53.1 (29.8, 90.6) 58 (2, 68) 3 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.6, -1.7)
Catawba County 2 Urban 54.3 (38.9, 74.0) 57 (7, 68) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Union County 2 Urban 54.4 (42.4, 68.8) 56 (12, 68) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.1)
Halifax County 2 Rural 54.7 (44.5, 66.8) 55 (17, 67) 21 falling falling trend -12.1 (-25.8, -2.0)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 54.9 (40.1, 74.3) 54 (6, 68) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 1.2)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 55.4 (40.9, 73.9) 53 (7, 68) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 2.0)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 55.6 (49.8, 61.8) 52 (28, 64) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.4, -0.4)
Durham County 2 Urban 56.1 (49.9, 62.8) 51 (24, 63) 66 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.9)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 56.2 (45.3, 69.1) 50 (13, 67) 20 falling falling trend -7.8 (-25.0, -0.8)
Person County 2 Urban 56.4 (40.0, 78.0) 49 (5, 68) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-16.6, -1.8)
Wake County 2 Urban 57.0 (52.1, 62.3) 48 (26, 60) 113 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jones County 2 Rural 57.1 (32.9, 101.2) 47 (1, 68) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.0, 1.5)
Anson County 2 Urban 57.1 (40.5, 78.8) 46 (4, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.2)
Iredell County 2 Urban 57.2 (44.2, 72.8) 45 (9, 68) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.7)
Granville County 2 Rural 57.6 (45.2, 72.7) 44 (7, 67) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 58.4 (54.3, 62.7) 43 (27, 58) 173 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 58.6 (47.3, 71.5) 42 (10, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.3)
Lee County 2 Rural 58.7 (42.4, 79.5) 41 (4, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.3)
Martin County 2 Rural 59.6 (43.2, 81.6) 40 (3, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.6)
Hoke County 2 Urban 60.0 (44.9, 78.6) 39 (5, 68) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 1.7)
Hertford County 2 Rural 60.4 (45.1, 80.0) 38 (5, 68) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.0)
Franklin County 2 Urban 60.7 (47.0, 77.5) 37 (5, 67) 14 falling falling trend -9.3 (-22.3, -2.9)
Gaston County 2 Urban 61.7 (50.4, 74.8) 36 (7, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.2)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 62.0 (51.2, 74.7) 35 (7, 64) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Burke County 2 Urban 62.1 (38.5, 96.1) 34 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.9)
Columbus County 2 Rural 62.1 (47.7, 80.0) 33 (4, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Wilson County 2 Rural 64.1 (53.2, 76.8) 32 (6, 62) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Pitt County 2 Urban 64.2 (55.1, 74.3) 31 (9, 58) 40 stable stable trend 8.9 (-1.6, 17.5)
Sampson County 2 Rural 64.4 (50.3, 81.9) 30 (3, 66) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.6)
Moore County 2 Urban 65.1 (48.6, 86.0) 29 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.3)
Warren County 2 Rural 65.7 (48.7, 87.9) 28 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.6)
Wayne County 2 Urban 66.0 (55.9, 77.5) 27 (6, 58) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.7)
Bladen County 2 Rural 66.5 (49.9, 88.1) 26 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.2)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 66.7 (54.2, 81.4) 25 (4, 61) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Guilford County 2 Urban 67.6 (61.9, 73.7) 24 (10, 43) 114 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Harnett County 2 Rural 68.5 (55.3, 83.8) 23 (2, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.7)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 68.5 (52.9, 87.5) 22 (2, 65) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.4)
Robeson County 2 Rural 69.4 (57.0, 83.8) 21 (3, 59) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 69.5 (62.3, 77.2) 20 (7, 44) 75 falling falling trend -6.6 (-11.9, -1.1)
Rowan County 2 Urban 69.5 (55.9, 85.6) 19 (2, 62) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 69.7 (47.6, 99.6) 18 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 4.2)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 71.0 (40.3, 125.8) 17 (1, 68) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.1)
Randolph County 2 Urban 71.3 (49.9, 99.2) 16 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 72.6 (56.8, 91.7) 15 (1, 62) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 3.0)
Scotland County 2 Rural 72.8 (54.7, 95.2) 14 (1, 64) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.3)
Orange County 2 Urban 74.6 (57.4, 95.5) 13 (1, 62) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.6)
Onslow County 2 Urban 75.0 (59.9, 92.6) 12 (1, 57) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 2.1)
Washington County 2 Rural 75.1 (48.6, 112.1) 11 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.6)
Richmond County 2 Rural 76.0 (57.6, 98.7) 10 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.5)
Stanly County 2 Rural 76.7 (52.4, 109.0) 9 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.8, 1.9)
Alamance County 2 Urban 79.8 (67.4, 93.9) 8 (1, 41) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Caswell County 2 Rural 80.8 (59.5, 109.2) 7 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.5)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 81.1 (65.7, 99.5) 6 (1, 47) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Vance County 2 Rural 81.5 (66.1, 99.6) 5 (1, 45) 22 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.1)
Northampton County 2 Rural 83.2 (62.6, 109.3) 4 (1, 57) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Craven County 2 Rural 83.4 (68.6, 100.6) 3 (1, 38) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Davie County 2 Urban 97.6 (59.3, 154.7) 2 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Surry County 2 Rural 106.4 (65.0, 167.1) 1 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.9)
Alexander County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/31/2026 1:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top