Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 21.0 (20.4, 21.6) N/A 948 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Osage County 2 Urban 12.8 (8.9, 17.9) 53 (33, 53) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.5)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 15.6 (11.3, 21.2) 52 (20, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.4)
Seminole County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.1, 23.6) 51 (14, 53) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.4, 7.2)
Caddo County 2 Rural 16.4 (10.5, 24.4) 50 (10, 53) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.8, 6.2)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 16.4 (11.5, 22.8) 49 (16, 53) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.0)
Bryan County 2 Rural 17.0 (12.4, 23.0) 48 (15, 53) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-14.6, -0.1)
Custer County 2 Rural 17.1 (11.0, 25.4) 47 (9, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.1)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 17.3 (11.6, 24.8) 46 (10, 53) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.2)
Carter County 2 Rural 17.6 (13.0, 23.3) 45 (13, 53) 10 stable stable trend -10.6 (-36.4, 3.6)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 17.9 (13.9, 22.7) 44 (17, 53) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.4)
Kay County 2 Rural 18.1 (13.1, 24.5) 43 (11, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.4)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 18.4 (13.8, 24.1) 42 (12, 53) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 6.4)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 18.7 (13.4, 25.7) 41 (9, 53) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.1, 7.1)
Garfield County 2 Urban 19.0 (14.9, 24.1) 40 (13, 53) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.4, 3.3)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 19.1 (15.0, 23.9) 39 (14, 52) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.6)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 19.2 (13.7, 26.4) 38 (9, 53) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.6, 6.4)
Delaware County 2 Rural 19.2 (14.5, 25.3) 37 (9, 53) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 19.3 (12.1, 29.9) 36 (4, 53) 5
*
*
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 19.4 (14.3, 25.7) 35 (9, 53) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.2)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 20.1 (18.6, 21.6) 34 (22, 44) 147 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.8, 0.7)
Mayes County 2 Rural 20.3 (14.7, 27.5) 33 (7, 53) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 4.3)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 20.4 (19.1, 21.9) 32 (21, 43) 169 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.4)
Creek County 2 Urban 20.9 (16.6, 25.9) 31 (9, 51) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.4)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 20.9 (18.6, 23.4) 30 (16, 44) 64 falling falling trend -6.7 (-17.8, -0.3)
Woodward County 2 Rural 21.6 (13.8, 32.2) 29 (3, 53) 5
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 21.6 (16.9, 27.4) 28 (7, 51) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.4)
Latimer County 2 Rural 22.6 (12.7, 38.2) 27 (2, 53) 3
*
*
Beckham County 2 Rural 22.7 (14.8, 33.4) 26 (2, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.6, 4.1)
Haskell County 2 Rural 22.8 (13.5, 36.7) 25 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Rogers County 2 Urban 23.0 (19.1, 27.5) 24 (7, 45) 25 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.0)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 23.5 (16.9, 32.0) 23 (3, 51) 9 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 7.1)
Logan County 2 Urban 23.5 (18.1, 30.2) 22 (4, 49) 14 stable stable trend -8.0 (-23.0, 0.0)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 23.8 (14.6, 36.9) 21 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.8)
Canadian County 2 Urban 24.0 (20.7, 27.7) 20 (7, 38) 38 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.3)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 24.2 (13.4, 40.7) 19 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 24.3 (18.3, 31.7) 18 (3, 48) 12
*
*
Payne County 2 Rural 24.7 (19.7, 30.5) 17 (4, 44) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.1)
Comanche County 2 Urban 24.8 (20.8, 29.2) 16 (5, 39) 30 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.0, 16.1)
Grady County 2 Urban 25.4 (20.0, 31.9) 15 (3, 43) 16 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.6, 7.5)
Atoka County 2 Rural 26.2 (16.3, 40.1) 14 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Woods County 2 Rural 26.4 (15.0, 44.3) 13 (1, 53) 3
*
*
McIntosh County 2 Rural 26.4 (17.6, 38.4) 12 (1, 51) 7 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 6.8)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 26.7 (22.2, 31.8) 11 (3, 34) 27 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 6.3)
Stephens County 2 Rural 27.5 (21.4, 34.9) 10 (2, 41) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.5, 6.9)
Blaine County 2 Rural 28.5 (15.5, 48.4) 9 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Washita County 2 Rural 28.7 (16.4, 46.9) 8 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 29.0 (17.7, 45.2) 7 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Garvin County 2 Rural 29.0 (21.0, 39.2) 6 (1, 45) 9 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.5, 12.1)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 29.7 (19.7, 43.2) 5 (1, 49) 6
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 29.8 (21.1, 41.0) 4 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.8)
McClain County 2 Urban 35.7 (28.3, 44.4) 3 (1, 20) 17 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.5, 7.8)
Major County 2 Rural 35.8 (21.3, 57.4) 2 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural 46.0 (28.4, 70.9) 1 (1, 35) 5
*
*
Adair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 2:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top