Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 2 N/A 25.3 (24.7, 25.8) N/A 1,824 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.6, 8.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Price County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.0, 19.8) 67 (51, 67) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.8, 2.9)
Richland County 2 Rural 12.6 (7.5, 20.8) 66 (42, 67) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.7, 4.2)
Milwaukee County 2 Urban 15.0 (13.9, 16.1) 65 (58, 67) 149 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.2)
Burnett County 2 Rural 16.5 (10.0, 26.7) 64 (11, 67) 5 stable stable trend -18.7 (-38.3, 3.9)
Rusk County 2 Rural 17.0 (9.0, 29.7) 63 (5, 67) 3
*
*
Ashland County 2 Rural 17.4 (9.4, 29.5) 62 (4, 67) 3
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 17.8 (11.0, 27.3) 61 (9, 67) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 8.3)
Pierce County 2 Urban 18.4 (13.1, 25.1) 60 (21, 67) 9 stable stable trend -5.2 (-23.0, 2.0)
Green Lake County 2 Rural 19.7 (13.0, 29.2) 59 (9, 67) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 7.7)
Crawford County 2 Rural 20.0 (11.9, 31.9) 58 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Oneida County 2 Rural 20.0 (15.1, 26.5) 57 (17, 66) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-6.0, 5.0)
Shawano County 2 Rural 20.6 (15.5, 27.1) 56 (16, 66) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.8)
Taylor County 2 Rural 20.8 (13.4, 31.2) 55 (3, 67) 6
*
*
Washburn County 2 Rural 20.9 (13.5, 31.8) 54 (3, 67) 6
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural 21.3 (16.2, 27.4) 53 (13, 66) 13 stable stable trend -16.7 (-29.0, 0.9)
Adams County 2 Rural 21.7 (14.0, 32.7) 52 (2, 67) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.3, 9.1)
Portage County 2 Rural 21.9 (17.2, 27.4) 51 (15, 64) 17 rising rising trend 19.2 (4.0, 32.1)
Juneau County 2 Rural 22.3 (15.7, 31.0) 50 (4, 66) 8 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.2, 7.9)
Waupaca County 2 Rural 22.5 (17.7, 28.4) 49 (9, 64) 17 stable stable trend -7.3 (-33.6, 5.1)
Vilas County 2 Rural 22.6 (15.8, 32.0) 48 (2, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.3, 7.1)
Sauk County 2 Rural 22.8 (18.4, 28.1) 47 (13, 63) 20 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.6, 8.8)
Sawyer County 2 Rural 22.9 (15.1, 34.0) 46 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend -2.8 (-22.1, 4.0)
Wood County 2 Rural 23.3 (18.9, 28.4) 45 (11, 62) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.7)
Marinette County 2 Rural 23.4 (17.8, 30.3) 44 (6, 64) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.7, 5.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 23.4 (17.1, 31.6) 43 (3, 65) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 7.1)
Polk County 2 Rural 23.5 (18.0, 30.2) 42 (6, 63) 15 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 6.2)
Outagamie County 2 Urban 23.6 (20.7, 26.8) 41 (19, 58) 50 stable stable trend 8.4 (-5.3, 24.0)
Marathon County 2 Urban 23.7 (20.4, 27.4) 40 (16, 59) 40 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.0, 0.4)
Kenosha County 2 Urban 23.8 (20.7, 27.2) 39 (16, 58) 47 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.3, 10.0)
Fond du Lac County 2 Urban 24.0 (20.2, 28.3) 38 (13, 60) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.0)
Door County 2 Rural 24.2 (17.0, 33.5) 37 (2, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 4.8)
Winnebago County 2 Urban 24.3 (21.3, 27.6) 36 (16, 57) 51 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.7, 1.0)
Marquette County 2 Rural 24.4 (16.1, 36.3) 35 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.2)
Clark County 2 Rural 24.4 (17.9, 32.6) 34 (3, 65) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.7)
Dodge County 2 Rural 24.5 (20.6, 29.1) 33 (10, 59) 29 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.3, 5.9)
Oconto County 2 Urban 24.6 (18.4, 32.4) 32 (2, 64) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.6)
Kewaunee County 2 Urban 25.2 (17.4, 35.7) 31 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Rock County 2 Urban 25.3 (22.2, 28.8) 30 (12, 54) 50 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.3)
Racine County 2 Urban 25.3 (22.5, 28.5) 29 (14, 54) 61 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.9, 7.2)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 25.5 (21.2, 30.4) 28 (7, 59) 27 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.1, 6.0)
Sheboygan County 2 Urban 25.6 (22.0, 29.7) 27 (8, 56) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Barron County 2 Rural 26.5 (20.7, 33.6) 26 (2, 61) 17 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.6, 9.2)
Langlade County 2 Rural 26.8 (18.4, 38.2) 25 (1, 65) 8 rising rising trend 6.5 (2.9, 11.5)
Brown County 2 Urban 27.5 (24.9, 30.4) 24 (8, 43) 83 stable stable trend 8.3 (-2.5, 17.5)
Chippewa County 2 Urban 28.4 (23.5, 34.2) 23 (2, 53) 25 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.6, 5.9)
Ozaukee County 2 Urban 28.8 (24.5, 33.7) 22 (2, 49) 36 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.4)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 28.8 (19.0, 42.0) 21 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Iowa County 2 Urban 28.8 (20.4, 39.7) 20 (1, 62) 9
*
*
Dunn County 2 Rural 28.9 (22.2, 37.0) 19 (1, 58) 14 rising rising trend 8.3 (5.3, 12.7)
Green County 2 Urban 29.1 (22.4, 37.3) 18 (1, 59) 14 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 8.4)
Calumet County 2 Urban 29.4 (23.6, 36.3) 17 (1, 55) 19 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.3, 7.6)
Douglas County 2 Urban 29.5 (22.9, 37.4) 16 (1, 58) 15 stable stable trend -2.9 (-23.2, 7.5)
Vernon County 2 Urban 29.5 (22.1, 38.6) 15 (1, 60) 12 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.4, 8.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 29.7 (26.1, 33.7) 14 (3, 39) 54 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.6, 4.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 29.7 (23.5, 37.2) 13 (1, 55) 17 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.6, 8.0)
St. Croix County 2 Urban 30.1 (25.6, 35.3) 12 (1, 46) 33 rising rising trend 8.1 (6.2, 11.0)
Columbia County 2 Urban 30.7 (24.9, 37.4) 11 (1, 51) 22 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.6)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 30.8 (20.2, 45.7) 10 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Dane County 2 Urban 30.9 (28.9, 33.1) 9 (4, 25) 184 rising rising trend 3.4 (2.0, 5.1)
Walworth County 2 Rural 31.5 (27.3, 36.3) 8 (1, 36) 44 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.3)
Eau Claire County 2 Urban 32.0 (27.4, 37.2) 7 (1, 37) 37 stable stable trend 2.1 (-5.9, 6.6)
Manitowoc County 2 Rural 32.7 (27.8, 38.4) 6 (1, 36) 36 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.7)
Waushara County 2 Rural 33.2 (24.5, 44.2) 5 (1, 56) 12 rising rising trend 5.9 (3.0, 10.2)
Waukesha County 2 Urban 33.7 (31.5, 36.1) 4 (1, 16) 181 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.7, 3.3)
Bayfield County 2 Rural 34.5 (23.3, 49.7) 3 (1, 60) 9
*
*
La Crosse County 2 Urban 35.1 (30.6, 40.0) 2 (1, 23) 49 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.8)
Trempealeau County 2 Rural 36.6 (27.7, 47.5) 1 (1, 46) 13 rising rising trend 5.5 (2.2, 9.9)
Florence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 9:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top