Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 28.0 (27.6, 28.5) N/A 3,490 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.0, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 25.5 (18.6, 34.6) 53 (11, 87) 10 stable stable trend -9.9 (-28.4, 2.4)
Scotland County 2 Rural 13.1 (8.7, 19.1) 91 (62, 94) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-21.4, 0.8)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 18.1 (11.3, 29.0) 80 (28, 94) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 2.1)
Currituck County 2 Urban 20.8 (14.5, 29.2) 70 (22, 94) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-12.8, 2.1)
Guilford County 2 Urban 27.7 (25.8, 29.6) 42 (28, 58) 171 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.3, 0.9)
Martin County 2 Rural 16.9 (10.5, 26.0) 83 (30, 94) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.6)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 21.5 (16.5, 27.8) 66 (31, 89) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9)
Person County 2 Urban 30.3 (23.7, 38.3) 33 (6, 72) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.5, 3.3)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 27.0 (20.0, 35.9) 47 (9, 84) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.9, 2.0)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 18.4 (10.7, 31.1) 78 (17, 94) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 6.3)
Lee County 2 Rural 19.4 (15.1, 24.5) 72 (41, 91) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.3, 18.4) 85 (71, 91) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.9, 1.2)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 22.8 (17.3, 29.7) 64 (23, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Chatham County 2 Urban 32.5 (27.7, 37.9) 26 (7, 57) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.7)
Davie County 2 Urban 37.9 (31.0, 46.0) 14 (2, 48) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.6)
Stokes County 2 Urban 26.5 (20.9, 33.3) 49 (14, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.1)
Harnett County 2 Rural 18.7 (15.6, 22.3) 77 (56, 89) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.9)
Nash County 2 Urban 18.0 (14.7, 21.8) 81 (59, 91) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Stanly County 2 Rural 31.0 (25.7, 37.1) 31 (8, 65) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-10.5, 5.1)
Alamance County 2 Urban 24.6 (21.7, 27.9) 59 (33, 75) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.3)
Randolph County 2 Urban 29.3 (25.7, 33.2) 35 (16, 63) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-6.9, 2.2)
Haywood County 2 Rural 29.9 (25.1, 35.6) 34 (11, 67) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.6)
Halifax County 2 Rural 13.9 (10.0, 18.9) 90 (66, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.6)
Orange County 2 Urban 31.2 (27.4, 35.4) 29 (12, 55) 51 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.9, 2.3)
Rowan County 2 Urban 27.1 (23.7, 30.8) 46 (22, 68) 49 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 3.1)
Surry County 2 Rural 25.9 (21.5, 31.1) 51 (22, 77) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.4)
McDowell County 2 Rural 29.1 (23.0, 36.4) 38 (8, 74) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 4.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.7, 24.0) 89 (41, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.6, 5.9)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 26.6 (23.7, 29.8) 48 (29, 68) 63 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.8)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 25.9 (24.5, 27.3) 52 (38, 63) 276 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.0, 3.0)
Yancey County 2 Rural 32.8 (23.6, 45.0) 23 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.7, 7.3)
Pitt County 2 Urban 18.2 (15.5, 21.4) 79 (60, 90) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.3)
Craven County 2 Rural 27.7 (23.6, 32.4) 41 (18, 70) 36 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 10.9 (7.5, 15.5) 94 (78, 94) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.0, 7.4)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 21.5 (17.0, 27.0) 67 (34, 87) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.3)
Henderson County 2 Urban 35.6 (31.6, 40.1) 18 (5, 37) 67 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.1)
Wilson County 2 Rural 19.2 (15.3, 23.7) 74 (49, 90) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.4)
Warren County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.7, 24.4) 87 (39, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.2, 7.7)
Moore County 2 Urban 41.6 (36.9, 46.9) 5 (2, 24) 63 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.4)
Hoke County 2 Urban 16.4 (11.3, 23.0) 84 (49, 94) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.8, 6.2)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 32.1 (25.3, 40.5) 27 (4, 68) 20 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.2)
Wake County 2 Urban 28.0 (26.6, 29.5) 40 (30, 53) 320 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.2, 3.5)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 27.1 (22.4, 32.6) 45 (18, 74) 26 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.7)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 24.7 (18.5, 32.4) 58 (14, 89) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 6.9)
Duplin County 2 Rural 19.2 (14.5, 25.2) 73 (40, 92) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.0)
Granville County 2 Rural 24.4 (19.4, 30.2) 60 (23, 84) 18 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.8)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 26.4 (17.6, 39.8) 50 (6, 91) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.8)
Bladen County 2 Rural 18.8 (13.0, 26.6) 76 (31, 94) 8 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.1, 6.3)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 32.7 (30.0, 35.5) 25 (13, 41) 118 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.8, 4.4)
Davidson County 2 Urban 31.1 (27.7, 34.7) 30 (13, 52) 68 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.0, 11.1)
Onslow County 2 Urban 27.3 (23.6, 31.3) 44 (21, 68) 43 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 5.3)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 35.8 (30.8, 41.5) 16 (4, 46) 40 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.5, 4.9)
Iredell County 2 Urban 38.5 (34.8, 42.5) 12 (3, 25) 86 stable stable trend 3.2 (-4.4, 5.4)
Burke County 2 Urban 34.1 (29.4, 39.3) 19 (6, 49) 42 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.8, 5.1)
Alexander County 2 Urban 39.7 (31.9, 49.0) 9 (1, 48) 20 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.8, 7.1)
Catawba County 2 Urban 38.8 (35.0, 43.0) 11 (3, 27) 80 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.8, 5.5)
Robeson County 2 Rural 11.8 (9.2, 14.9) 93 (81, 94) 15 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.2, 6.3)
Sampson County 2 Rural 23.2 (18.2, 29.2) 62 (24, 87) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.4)
Johnston County 2 Urban 27.5 (24.4, 30.8) 43 (25, 66) 63 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.9, 5.9)
Durham County 2 Urban 25.5 (23.1, 28.1) 54 (34, 69) 87 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.5, 5.4)
Northampton County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.4, 23.6) 88 (47, 94) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 11.1)
Pender County 2 Urban 30.7 (25.2, 37.2) 32 (8, 66) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.1, 7.2)
Richmond County 2 Rural 20.4 (15.4, 26.6) 71 (33, 91) 12 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 7.8)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 32.8 (27.3, 39.1) 24 (6, 60) 29 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.2, 7.1)
Jackson County 2 Rural 32.9 (26.2, 40.8) 21 (3, 67) 19 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.3, 7.6)
Union County 2 Urban 32.8 (29.7, 36.2) 22 (11, 43) 84 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.9)
Avery County 2 Rural 35.9 (26.2, 48.6) 15 (1, 71) 10 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.1, 9.7)
Macon County 2 Rural 41.1 (33.2, 50.6) 6 (1, 44) 24 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.2, 6.9)
Wayne County 2 Urban 21.2 (17.7, 25.1) 69 (43, 86) 29 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.3, 7.0)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 28.1 (23.9, 32.8) 39 (16, 72) 35 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.1, 7.4)
Franklin County 2 Urban 24.8 (20.0, 30.4) 57 (23, 82) 20 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.3, 7.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 40.1 (34.8, 46.0) 8 (2, 29) 46 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.8, 7.2)
Vance County 2 Rural 21.4 (16.2, 27.8) 68 (30, 91) 12 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.9, 7.9)
Dare County 2 Rural 47.2 (38.6, 57.4) 3 (1, 21) 25 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.4, 8.7)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 35.8 (32.6, 39.2) 17 (7, 33) 100 rising rising trend 5.4 (3.3, 8.2)
Watauga County 2 Rural 47.9 (39.8, 57.3) 2 (1, 20) 27 rising rising trend 5.4 (3.5, 7.8)
Caswell County 2 Rural 25.3 (17.6, 35.5) 55 (7, 90) 8 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.9, 9.3)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 38.0 (25.7, 54.3) 13 (1, 80) 8 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.2, 8.9)
Gaston County 2 Urban 33.8 (30.6, 37.1) 20 (10, 39) 91 rising rising trend 5.8 (4.3, 7.9)
Anson County 2 Urban 19.1 (12.4, 28.3) 75 (22, 94) 6 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.5, 11.8)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 22.7 (20.7, 24.8) 65 (48, 77) 102 stable stable trend 6.5 (-2.5, 13.5)
Carteret County 2 Rural 52.0 (45.3, 59.4) 1 (1, 8) 54 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.8, 19.4)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 40.6 (36.7, 44.9) 7 (2, 22) 108 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.6, 17.9)
Columbus County 2 Rural 29.1 (23.5, 35.7) 37 (9, 73) 21 rising rising trend 14.7 (4.4, 33.3)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 24.1 (20.4, 28.5) 61 (30, 80) 32 stable stable trend 17.3 (-2.2, 32.3)
Chowan County 2 Rural 25.0 (16.1, 37.7) 56 (5, 93) 6 rising rising trend 18.5 (3.7, 45.2)
Ashe County 2 Rural 43.9 (34.0, 55.9) 4 (1, 47) 17
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural 12.8 (7.1, 21.7) 92 (52, 94) 4
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban 31.3 (18.7, 49.7) 28 (1, 92) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 15.7 (9.5, 27.2) 86 (36, 94) 4
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban 38.9 (28.8, 51.7) 10 (1, 62) 11
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural 29.2 (20.3, 41.1) 36 (3, 86) 10
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural 23.2 (13.6, 37.0) 63 (5, 94) 4
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 17.6 (10.0, 30.2) 82 (20, 94) 3
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 10:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top