Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 130.0 (125.9, 134.2) N/A 825 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 130.5 (129.8, 131.2) N/A 31,484 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 0.6)
Adams County 2 Rural 119.9 (90.8, 155.5) 46 (8, 63) 13 rising rising trend 10.0 (2.7, 25.8)
Amite County 2 Rural 114.7 (70.3, 180.3) 49 (2, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.9, 4.2)
Attala County 2 Rural 138.7 (93.9, 197.7) 26 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 3.9)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 94.5 (71.2, 123.2) 62 (27, 64) 12 falling falling trend -29.5 (-50.8, -1.4)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 126.8 (83.7, 184.7) 42 (2, 64) 6
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural 141.7 (92.6, 207.0) 22 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Clarke County 2 Rural 99.4 (58.6, 159.8) 60 (5, 64) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.7, 0.8)
Clay County 2 Rural 137.0 (99.5, 184.2) 28 (2, 62) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.6, 10.4)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 127.8 (96.7, 165.7) 41 (4, 62) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 4.7)
Copiah County 2 Urban 140.3 (106.0, 182.4) 24 (2, 61) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7)
Covington County 2 Rural 142.6 (93.1, 209.5) 20 (1, 64) 5
*
*
DeSoto County 2 Urban 151.4 (128.4, 177.2) 11 (3, 45) 40 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 4.5)
Forrest County 2 Urban 154.3 (124.9, 188.3) 10 (2, 52) 20 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.6)
Grenada County 2 Rural 151.3 (107.5, 207.1) 12 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.7)
Hancock County 2 Urban 128.9 (70.5, 217.6) 39 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Harrison County 2 Urban 110.4 (92.8, 130.4) 52 (23, 62) 30 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.4, 0.5)
Hinds County 2 Urban 138.7 (128.0, 150.1) 25 (12, 42) 133 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Holmes County 2 Urban 141.9 (107.2, 184.6) 21 (2, 60) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.5)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 220.6 (156.5, 303.0) 1 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.0, 9.9)
Jackson County 2 Urban 109.1 (88.2, 133.6) 53 (20, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.9)
Jasper County 2 Rural 135.2 (94.5, 188.3) 30 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.7)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 138.4 (91.7, 202.6) 27 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.9, 5.5)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 111.9 (74.6, 163.8) 51 (4, 64) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.9)
Jones County 2 Rural 106.5 (79.9, 139.1) 57 (14, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 5.0)
Kemper County 2 Rural 132.6 (78.8, 209.6) 33 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 136.0 (97.4, 184.6) 29 (2, 63) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.3)
Lamar County 2 Urban 89.5 (58.8, 131.0) 63 (18, 64) 6
*
*
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 101.4 (81.5, 124.8) 59 (27, 64) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.7)
Leake County 2 Rural 112.3 (72.9, 165.7) 50 (4, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.9, 5.0)
Lee County 2 Rural 124.7 (97.5, 156.9) 43 (7, 62) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.4)
Leflore County 2 Rural 156.5 (124.6, 194.0) 9 (1, 52) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 134.5 (97.6, 181.5) 31 (2, 63) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.4, 3.4)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 143.0 (117.4, 172.6) 19 (3, 55) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 141.5 (119.0, 166.9) 23 (4, 52) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 130.7 (87.4, 188.7) 37 (1, 64) 6 falling falling trend -8.0 (-29.8, -1.9)
Marshall County 2 Urban 97.5 (71.2, 130.9) 61 (20, 64) 10 stable stable trend -14.7 (-35.9, 0.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 169.3 (126.2, 222.7) 3 (1, 52) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 7.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 108.6 (60.6, 181.7) 55 (2, 64) 3
*
*
Neshoba County 2 Rural 144.5 (91.8, 216.0) 18 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural 102.5 (61.3, 161.0) 58 (5, 64) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.2, 1.9)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 162.9 (113.5, 227.2) 7 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.7)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 131.2 (99.2, 170.1) 36 (3, 62) 12 rising rising trend 27.3 (1.9, 50.4)
Panola County 2 Rural 128.6 (96.0, 168.7) 40 (3, 63) 11 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.0, 8.7)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 148.9 (98.7, 216.4) 14 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.7, 8.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 129.0 (100.9, 162.3) 38 (5, 61) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.4)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 167.1 (102.8, 256.7) 4 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Quitman County 2 Rural 165.3 (104.7, 250.3) 5 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Rankin County 2 Urban 123.7 (100.0, 151.4) 44 (9, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.6)
Scott County 2 Urban 132.1 (93.8, 181.2) 34 (2, 63) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.9)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 181.0 (97.2, 309.1) 2 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Simpson County 2 Urban 164.2 (117.6, 223.4) 6 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.0, 5.9)
Smith County 2 Rural 146.3 (83.3, 241.2) 16 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Sunflower County 2 Rural 133.1 (102.2, 170.5) 32 (4, 62) 14 falling falling trend -20.6 (-36.7, -1.3)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 147.4 (97.8, 213.4) 15 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 7.2)
Tate County 2 Urban 108.7 (69.2, 162.6) 54 (4, 64) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.4, 1.0)
Tunica County 2 Urban 159.6 (103.9, 233.3) 8 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.3)
Walthall County 2 Rural 144.8 (93.9, 214.3) 17 (1, 64) 6 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 8.7)
Warren County 2 Rural 131.3 (104.1, 163.6) 35 (4, 59) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.8)
Washington County 2 Rural 149.5 (125.9, 176.4) 13 (3, 49) 31 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.3, 4.3)
Wayne County 2 Rural 107.4 (68.5, 160.5) 56 (4, 64) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.7, 11.9)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 115.3 (69.6, 181.5) 48 (2, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 3.0)
Winston County 2 Rural 82.5 (51.3, 126.7) 64 (22, 64) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.9, 2.4)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 120.4 (72.4, 191.0) 45 (2, 64) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.6, 19.2)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 119.0 (85.3, 161.6) 47 (4, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.2)
Alcorn County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prentiss County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 6:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top