Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 145.1 (142.2, 148.1) N/A 1,987 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 130.5 (129.8, 131.2) N/A 31,484 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 0.6)
Alamance County 2 Urban 128.9 (108.1, 152.5) 57 (13, 68) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-10.8, 1.8)
Anson County 2 Urban 119.1 (86.5, 161.5) 64 (6, 69) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.4)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 135.8 (99.9, 181.2) 44 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.6)
Bertie County 2 Rural 147.5 (106.6, 199.8) 28 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.7)
Bladen County 2 Rural 121.7 (87.9, 165.7) 63 (5, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 136.3 (104.2, 176.2) 42 (2, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 4.2)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 126.8 (96.5, 163.9) 59 (6, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.6)
Burke County 2 Urban 129.9 (78.2, 205.1) 54 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.0, 6.4)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 153.7 (131.0, 179.1) 19 (3, 59) 35 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.5)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 166.1 (97.5, 263.9) 8 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 25.7 (-1.7, 67.4)
Caswell County 2 Rural 130.4 (88.6, 188.6) 53 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.2)
Catawba County 2 Urban 106.9 (77.1, 144.7) 68 (13, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 3.1)
Chatham County 2 Urban 141.4 (100.9, 194.0) 38 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.0)
Chowan County 2 Rural 171.0 (106.2, 261.3) 6 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Cleveland County 2 Rural 152.8 (123.3, 187.4) 21 (2, 65) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.5)
Columbus County 2 Rural 123.7 (94.6, 159.8) 61 (7, 69) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.9)
Craven County 2 Rural 110.6 (85.6, 140.8) 67 (21, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 147.8 (135.1, 161.2) 27 (10, 51) 106 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 1.7)
Davidson County 2 Urban 129.8 (99.7, 166.3) 55 (5, 69) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-10.9, 0.1)
Duplin County 2 Rural 153.4 (117.3, 198.0) 20 (1, 68) 15 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.3, 15.1)
Durham County 2 Urban 143.0 (130.4, 156.6) 34 (13, 56) 100 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 135.6 (112.6, 162.2) 45 (7, 67) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 152.7 (138.6, 167.9) 22 (6, 50) 92 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.9)
Franklin County 2 Urban 136.0 (107.1, 170.7) 43 (4, 68) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.6)
Gaston County 2 Urban 130.6 (110.2, 153.8) 52 (12, 68) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.3)
Granville County 2 Rural 147.4 (116.8, 183.9) 29 (2, 67) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 176.2 (121.4, 249.4) 4 (1, 68) 8 rising rising trend 14.2 (3.2, 46.3)
Guilford County 2 Urban 154.8 (144.0, 166.2) 18 (7, 43) 160 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.8)
Halifax County 2 Rural 147.2 (122.3, 176.1) 30 (3, 65) 29 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.5)
Harnett County 2 Rural 117.6 (94.3, 144.9) 65 (19, 69) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 4.2)
Hertford County 2 Rural 160.8 (123.1, 207.4) 14 (1, 66) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.5)
Hoke County 2 Urban 162.0 (128.2, 202.2) 12 (1, 63) 17 stable stable trend 2.6 (0.0, 5.8)
Iredell County 2 Urban 141.7 (114.0, 174.2) 36 (3, 67) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 3.0)
Johnston County 2 Urban 165.9 (141.6, 193.2) 9 (1, 50) 35 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 6.1)
Jones County 2 Rural 172.5 (90.8, 301.9) 5 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.7)
Lee County 2 Rural 137.8 (102.5, 181.9) 40 (2, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 4.0)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 125.7 (102.1, 153.6) 60 (13, 69) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 117.5 (66.5, 192.9) 66 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural 177.2 (133.5, 232.1) 3 (1, 64) 13 rising rising trend 14.8 (2.8, 28.3)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 142.6 (134.8, 150.6) 35 (19, 52) 274 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 137.0 (86.3, 210.2) 41 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.4, 6.4)
Moore County 2 Urban 131.5 (96.7, 175.2) 51 (3, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.6)
Nash County 2 Urban 132.4 (112.3, 155.2) 48 (10, 67) 34 falling falling trend -11.5 (-19.0, -1.6)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 145.0 (120.8, 172.8) 33 (3, 65) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.5)
Northampton County 2 Rural 134.0 (96.1, 183.6) 47 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 4.7)
Onslow County 2 Urban 141.6 (114.1, 173.6) 37 (3, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Orange County 2 Urban 129.3 (98.9, 166.5) 56 (4, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.6)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 102.3 (74.1, 137.9) 69 (23, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
Pender County 2 Urban 157.3 (113.2, 214.3) 17 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.8)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 151.7 (79.1, 266.6) 24 (1, 69) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.2, 4.9)
Person County 2 Urban 152.4 (114.7, 199.9) 23 (1, 68) 13 falling falling trend -15.2 (-26.0, -3.8)
Pitt County 2 Urban 178.3 (158.5, 199.8) 2 (1, 30) 63 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.1)
Randolph County 2 Urban 146.1 (103.4, 200.9) 32 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.6, 7.2)
Richmond County 2 Rural 146.3 (110.4, 190.5) 31 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.4)
Robeson County 2 Rural 139.9 (114.9, 168.9) 39 (4, 67) 24 stable stable trend -6.8 (-15.4, 4.1)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 151.4 (121.4, 187.2) 25 (1, 65) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.3)
Rowan County 2 Urban 131.6 (105.4, 162.4) 50 (7, 69) 19 stable stable trend -3.1 (-20.4, 0.3)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 127.1 (81.7, 189.9) 58 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 7.5)
Sampson County 2 Rural 161.3 (127.1, 202.5) 13 (1, 65) 18 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.4, 6.1)
Scotland County 2 Rural 122.0 (89.7, 162.8) 62 (5, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.6)
Stanly County 2 Rural 132.3 (83.4, 199.3) 49 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.2, 4.4)
Surry County 2 Rural 169.2 (93.5, 286.0) 7 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Union County 2 Urban 150.7 (124.3, 181.1) 26 (2, 65) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.9)
Vance County 2 Rural 163.3 (132.4, 199.2) 11 (1, 62) 22 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.6)
Wake County 2 Urban 159.6 (149.6, 170.2) 16 (5, 36) 203 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Warren County 2 Rural 135.2 (96.9, 185.3) 46 (2, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 3.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 178.3 (124.4, 250.5) 1 (1, 67) 8 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.9, 7.8)
Wayne County 2 Urban 160.3 (137.5, 185.9) 15 (2, 55) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Wilson County 2 Rural 164.6 (140.6, 191.8) 10 (1, 51) 36 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 12.3)
Alexander County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 2:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top