Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 134.1 (130.4, 137.8) N/A 1,071 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.5, 4.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 130.5 (129.8, 131.2) N/A 31,484 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 0.6)
Russell County 2 Urban 95.5 (75.3, 119.7) 48 (29, 48) 16 stable stable trend -3.8 (-15.5, 0.1)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 100.3 (69.7, 140.4) 47 (14, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.5, 6.4)
Elmore County 2 Urban 105.7 (78.1, 140.0) 46 (12, 48) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.2)
Coffee County 2 Rural 107.3 (72.0, 154.7) 45 (8, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 5.0)
Covington County 2 Rural 107.7 (60.0, 178.6) 44 (3, 48) 3
*
*
Henry County 2 Urban 108.6 (65.0, 175.1) 43 (4, 48) 4
*
*
Chambers County 2 Rural 110.8 (80.9, 148.4) 42 (10, 48) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 6.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 114.8 (77.0, 165.5) 41 (5, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 5.2)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 119.6 (67.4, 202.0) 40 (1, 48) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.2)
Wilcox County 2 Rural 121.9 (81.1, 176.9) 39 (3, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.1)
Escambia County 2 Rural 123.4 (86.7, 170.5) 38 (4, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.4)
Dale County 2 Rural 124.2 (87.2, 172.0) 37 (4, 48) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 3.8)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 124.8 (99.1, 155.2) 36 (7, 47) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Shelby County 2 Urban 125.4 (100.8, 154.4) 35 (8, 47) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 2.5)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 126.2 (96.9, 161.5) 34 (7, 48) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 4.1)
Etowah County 2 Urban 126.8 (96.0, 164.5) 33 (5, 48) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Limestone County 2 Urban 127.2 (93.8, 169.1) 32 (4, 48) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.4, 9.2)
Lee County 2 Urban 128.1 (107.0, 152.2) 31 (10, 46) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.7)
Mobile County 2 Urban 129.2 (118.4, 140.6) 30 (16, 41) 115 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 129.6 (83.8, 195.0) 29 (1, 48) 6
*
*
Bullock County 2 Rural 130.0 (86.4, 189.4) 28 (2, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.2, 7.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 131.1 (123.5, 139.1) 27 (17, 38) 238 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Barbour County 2 Rural 134.4 (96.6, 182.4) 26 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.7)
Colbert County 2 Urban 134.9 (94.8, 186.6) 25 (2, 48) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.1, 5.9)
Houston County 2 Urban 136.4 (111.5, 165.1) 24 (6, 45) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 138.8 (90.9, 204.4) 23 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.7)
Morgan County 2 Urban 139.8 (105.7, 181.5) 22 (2, 47) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.2)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 140.3 (128.3, 153.0) 21 (10, 36) 108 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.6)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 141.5 (124.7, 160.0) 20 (7, 39) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.4)
Perry County 2 Rural 142.0 (92.9, 209.1) 19 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 142.4 (127.9, 158.1) 18 (8, 36) 75 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.0)
Lowndes County 2 Urban 143.0 (97.6, 203.2) 17 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.5)
Macon County 2 Urban 145.4 (111.7, 186.6) 16 (2, 46) 15 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.8, 7.5)
Sumter County 2 Rural 148.7 (103.1, 208.0) 15 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.7, 7.0)
Autauga County 2 Urban 150.2 (112.0, 197.8) 14 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -4.5 (-21.5, 2.3)
Talladega County 2 Rural 150.3 (123.2, 181.6) 13 (3, 41) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 4.2)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 156.0 (108.8, 216.4) 12 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.5)
Dallas County 2 Rural 159.4 (133.2, 189.4) 11 (2, 37) 29 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.3)
Hale County 2 Urban 163.8 (118.9, 221.0) 10 (1, 46) 10
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Urban 164.5 (117.0, 226.1) 9 (1, 45) 8
*
*
Butler County 2 Rural 164.8 (119.5, 222.0) 8 (1, 45) 9
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 166.8 (123.8, 219.9) 7 (1, 44) 11 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 7.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 172.3 (100.1, 277.8) 6 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Crenshaw County 2 Rural 176.4 (103.4, 283.7) 5 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Pickens County 2 Urban 183.4 (134.2, 246.2) 4 (1, 40) 10 stable stable trend -16.1 (-40.8, 2.9)
Marengo County 2 Rural 189.9 (144.4, 245.9) 3 (1, 35) 13 rising rising trend 15.0 (5.3, 41.2)
Bibb County 2 Urban 193.8 (116.1, 304.6) 2 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Clarke County 2 Rural 195.5 (149.9, 251.1) 1 (1, 30) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.3)
Blount County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chilton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cullman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walker County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2026 12:21 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top