Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 134.1 (130.4, 137.8) N/A 1,071 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.5, 4.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 130.5 (129.8, 131.2) N/A 31,484 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 0.6)
Clarke County 2 Rural 195.5 (149.9, 251.1) 1 (1, 30) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.3)
Bibb County 2 Urban 193.8 (116.1, 304.6) 2 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Marengo County 2 Rural 189.9 (144.4, 245.9) 3 (1, 35) 13 rising rising trend 15.0 (5.3, 41.2)
Pickens County 2 Urban 183.4 (134.2, 246.2) 4 (1, 40) 10 stable stable trend -16.1 (-40.8, 2.9)
Crenshaw County 2 Rural 176.4 (103.4, 283.7) 5 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 172.3 (100.1, 277.8) 6 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 166.8 (123.8, 219.9) 7 (1, 44) 11 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 7.5)
Butler County 2 Rural 164.8 (119.5, 222.0) 8 (1, 45) 9
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Urban 164.5 (117.0, 226.1) 9 (1, 45) 8
*
*
Hale County 2 Urban 163.8 (118.9, 221.0) 10 (1, 46) 10
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural 159.4 (133.2, 189.4) 11 (2, 37) 29 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.3)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 156.0 (108.8, 216.4) 12 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.5)
Talladega County 2 Rural 150.3 (123.2, 181.6) 13 (3, 41) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 4.2)
Autauga County 2 Urban 150.2 (112.0, 197.8) 14 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -4.5 (-21.5, 2.3)
Sumter County 2 Rural 148.7 (103.1, 208.0) 15 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.7, 7.0)
Macon County 2 Urban 145.4 (111.7, 186.6) 16 (2, 46) 15 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.8, 7.5)
Lowndes County 2 Urban 143.0 (97.6, 203.2) 17 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 142.4 (127.9, 158.1) 18 (8, 36) 75 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.0)
Perry County 2 Rural 142.0 (92.9, 209.1) 19 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.2)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 141.5 (124.7, 160.0) 20 (7, 39) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.4)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 140.3 (128.3, 153.0) 21 (10, 36) 108 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.6)
Morgan County 2 Urban 139.8 (105.7, 181.5) 22 (2, 47) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.2)
Greene County 2 Urban 138.8 (90.9, 204.4) 23 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.7)
Houston County 2 Urban 136.4 (111.5, 165.1) 24 (6, 45) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.4)
Colbert County 2 Urban 134.9 (94.8, 186.6) 25 (2, 48) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.1, 5.9)
Barbour County 2 Rural 134.4 (96.6, 182.4) 26 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.7)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 131.1 (123.5, 139.1) 27 (17, 38) 238 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Bullock County 2 Rural 130.0 (86.4, 189.4) 28 (2, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.2, 7.1)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 129.6 (83.8, 195.0) 29 (1, 48) 6
*
*
Mobile County 2 Urban 129.2 (118.4, 140.6) 30 (16, 41) 115 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Lee County 2 Urban 128.1 (107.0, 152.2) 31 (10, 46) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.7)
Limestone County 2 Urban 127.2 (93.8, 169.1) 32 (4, 48) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.4, 9.2)
Etowah County 2 Urban 126.8 (96.0, 164.5) 33 (5, 48) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 126.2 (96.9, 161.5) 34 (7, 48) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 4.1)
Shelby County 2 Urban 125.4 (100.8, 154.4) 35 (8, 47) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 2.5)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 124.8 (99.1, 155.2) 36 (7, 47) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Dale County 2 Rural 124.2 (87.2, 172.0) 37 (4, 48) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 3.8)
Escambia County 2 Rural 123.4 (86.7, 170.5) 38 (4, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.4)
Wilcox County 2 Rural 121.9 (81.1, 176.9) 39 (3, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.1)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 119.6 (67.4, 202.0) 40 (1, 48) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 114.8 (77.0, 165.5) 41 (5, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 5.2)
Chambers County 2 Rural 110.8 (80.9, 148.4) 42 (10, 48) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 6.9)
Henry County 2 Urban 108.6 (65.0, 175.1) 43 (4, 48) 4
*
*
Covington County 2 Rural 107.7 (60.0, 178.6) 44 (3, 48) 3
*
*
Coffee County 2 Rural 107.3 (72.0, 154.7) 45 (8, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 5.0)
Elmore County 2 Urban 105.7 (78.1, 140.0) 46 (12, 48) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.2)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 100.3 (69.7, 140.4) 47 (14, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.5, 6.4)
Russell County 2 Urban 95.5 (75.3, 119.7) 48 (29, 48) 16 stable stable trend -3.8 (-15.5, 0.1)
Blount County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chilton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cullman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walker County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 4:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top