Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 145.1 (142.2, 148.1) N/A 1,987 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 130.5 (129.8, 131.2) N/A 31,484 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 0.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 178.3 (124.4, 250.5) 1 (1, 67) 8 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.9, 7.8)
Pitt County 2 Urban 178.3 (158.5, 199.8) 2 (1, 30) 63 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.1)
Martin County 2 Rural 177.2 (133.5, 232.1) 3 (1, 64) 13 rising rising trend 14.8 (2.8, 28.3)
Greene County 2 Rural 176.2 (121.4, 249.4) 4 (1, 68) 8 rising rising trend 14.2 (3.2, 46.3)
Jones County 2 Rural 172.5 (90.8, 301.9) 5 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.7)
Chowan County 2 Rural 171.0 (106.2, 261.3) 6 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Surry County 2 Rural 169.2 (93.5, 286.0) 7 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban 166.1 (97.5, 263.9) 8 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 25.7 (-1.7, 67.4)
Johnston County 2 Urban 165.9 (141.6, 193.2) 9 (1, 50) 35 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 6.1)
Wilson County 2 Rural 164.6 (140.6, 191.8) 10 (1, 51) 36 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 12.3)
Vance County 2 Rural 163.3 (132.4, 199.2) 11 (1, 62) 22 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.6)
Hoke County 2 Urban 162.0 (128.2, 202.2) 12 (1, 63) 17 stable stable trend 2.6 (0.0, 5.8)
Sampson County 2 Rural 161.3 (127.1, 202.5) 13 (1, 65) 18 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.4, 6.1)
Hertford County 2 Rural 160.8 (123.1, 207.4) 14 (1, 66) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.5)
Wayne County 2 Urban 160.3 (137.5, 185.9) 15 (2, 55) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Wake County 2 Urban 159.6 (149.6, 170.2) 16 (5, 36) 203 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Pender County 2 Urban 157.3 (113.2, 214.3) 17 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.8)
Guilford County 2 Urban 154.8 (144.0, 166.2) 18 (7, 43) 160 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.8)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 153.7 (131.0, 179.1) 19 (3, 59) 35 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.5)
Duplin County 2 Rural 153.4 (117.3, 198.0) 20 (1, 68) 15 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.3, 15.1)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 152.8 (123.3, 187.4) 21 (2, 65) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.5)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 152.7 (138.6, 167.9) 22 (6, 50) 92 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.9)
Person County 2 Urban 152.4 (114.7, 199.9) 23 (1, 68) 13 falling falling trend -15.2 (-26.0, -3.8)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 151.7 (79.1, 266.6) 24 (1, 69) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.2, 4.9)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 151.4 (121.4, 187.2) 25 (1, 65) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.3)
Union County 2 Urban 150.7 (124.3, 181.1) 26 (2, 65) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.9)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 147.8 (135.1, 161.2) 27 (10, 51) 106 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 1.7)
Bertie County 2 Rural 147.5 (106.6, 199.8) 28 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.7)
Granville County 2 Rural 147.4 (116.8, 183.9) 29 (2, 67) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.9)
Halifax County 2 Rural 147.2 (122.3, 176.1) 30 (3, 65) 29 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.5)
Richmond County 2 Rural 146.3 (110.4, 190.5) 31 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.4)
Randolph County 2 Urban 146.1 (103.4, 200.9) 32 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.6, 7.2)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 145.0 (120.8, 172.8) 33 (3, 65) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.5)
Durham County 2 Urban 143.0 (130.4, 156.6) 34 (13, 56) 100 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 142.6 (134.8, 150.6) 35 (19, 52) 274 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Iredell County 2 Urban 141.7 (114.0, 174.2) 36 (3, 67) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 3.0)
Onslow County 2 Urban 141.6 (114.1, 173.6) 37 (3, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Chatham County 2 Urban 141.4 (100.9, 194.0) 38 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.0)
Robeson County 2 Rural 139.9 (114.9, 168.9) 39 (4, 67) 24 stable stable trend -6.8 (-15.4, 4.1)
Lee County 2 Rural 137.8 (102.5, 181.9) 40 (2, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 4.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 137.0 (86.3, 210.2) 41 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.4, 6.4)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 136.3 (104.2, 176.2) 42 (2, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 4.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 136.0 (107.1, 170.7) 43 (4, 68) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.6)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 135.8 (99.9, 181.2) 44 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.6)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 135.6 (112.6, 162.2) 45 (7, 67) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Warren County 2 Rural 135.2 (96.9, 185.3) 46 (2, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 3.6)
Northampton County 2 Rural 134.0 (96.1, 183.6) 47 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 4.7)
Nash County 2 Urban 132.4 (112.3, 155.2) 48 (10, 67) 34 falling falling trend -11.5 (-19.0, -1.6)
Stanly County 2 Rural 132.3 (83.4, 199.3) 49 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.2, 4.4)
Rowan County 2 Urban 131.6 (105.4, 162.4) 50 (7, 69) 19 stable stable trend -3.1 (-20.4, 0.3)
Moore County 2 Urban 131.5 (96.7, 175.2) 51 (3, 69) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.6)
Gaston County 2 Urban 130.6 (110.2, 153.8) 52 (12, 68) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.3)
Caswell County 2 Rural 130.4 (88.6, 188.6) 53 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.2)
Burke County 2 Urban 129.9 (78.2, 205.1) 54 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.0, 6.4)
Davidson County 2 Urban 129.8 (99.7, 166.3) 55 (5, 69) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-10.9, 0.1)
Orange County 2 Urban 129.3 (98.9, 166.5) 56 (4, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.6)
Alamance County 2 Urban 128.9 (108.1, 152.5) 57 (13, 68) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-10.8, 1.8)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 127.1 (81.7, 189.9) 58 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 7.5)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 126.8 (96.5, 163.9) 59 (6, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.6)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 125.7 (102.1, 153.6) 60 (13, 69) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Columbus County 2 Rural 123.7 (94.6, 159.8) 61 (7, 69) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.9)
Scotland County 2 Rural 122.0 (89.7, 162.8) 62 (5, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.6)
Bladen County 2 Rural 121.7 (87.9, 165.7) 63 (5, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Anson County 2 Urban 119.1 (86.5, 161.5) 64 (6, 69) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.4)
Harnett County 2 Rural 117.6 (94.3, 144.9) 65 (19, 69) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 4.2)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 117.5 (66.5, 192.9) 66 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Craven County 2 Rural 110.6 (85.6, 140.8) 67 (21, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Catawba County 2 Urban 106.9 (77.1, 144.7) 68 (13, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 3.1)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 102.3 (74.1, 137.9) 69 (23, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
Alexander County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 6:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top