Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County
Cervix (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersIncidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.
Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
Other Notes- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
South Dakota2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 5.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.4 to 6.5 and 25 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 1.2.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 7.4 to 7.6 and 13,019 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to -0.6.
Pennington County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 10.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.5 to 15.2 and 5 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is 3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.4 to 8.3.
Aurora County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Beadle County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Bennett County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Bon Homme County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Brookings County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Brown County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Brule County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Buffalo County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Butte County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Campbell County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Charles Mix County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clark County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clay County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Codington County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Corson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Custer County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Davison County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Day County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Deuel County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Dewey County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Douglas County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Edmunds County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Fall River County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Faulk County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Grant County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Gregory County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Haakon County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hamlin County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hand County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hanson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Harding County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hughes County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hutchinson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hyde County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jackson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jerauld County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jones County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Kingsbury County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lake County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lawrence County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lincoln County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lyman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Marshall County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McCook County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
McPherson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Meade County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mellette County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Miner County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Minnehaha County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Moody County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Oglala Lakota County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Perkins County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Potter County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Roberts County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sanborn County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Spink County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Stanley County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sully County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Todd County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Tripp County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Turner County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Union County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Walworth County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Yankton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ziebach County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Notes:Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 10:19 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the
2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using
SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The
US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by
Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may
differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see
malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from
National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the
CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the
2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
1 Source:
National Program of Cancer Registries and
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.
2 Source:
National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).
* Data has been
suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.