Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County
Cervix (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersIncidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.
Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
Other Notes- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Iowa7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.6 to 7.9 and 111 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 5.7.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 7.4 to 7.6 and 13,019 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to -0.6.
Linn County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 6.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.6 to 9.2 and 7 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 8 (2, 8)
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 0.4.
Polk County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.4 to 9.7 and 20 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 2 (1, 7)
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 0.9.
Woodbury County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.4 to 11.8 and 4 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 3 (1, 8)
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 2.0.
Scott County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.8 to 10.1 and 6 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 5 (1, 8)
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 1.8.
Black Hawk County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 9.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.1 to 13.7 and 6 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 1 (1, 7)
- Recent Trend :
Dallas County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 6.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.1 to 11.0 and 4 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 6 (1, 8)
- Recent Trend :
Johnson County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 7.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.7 to 11.1 and 5 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 4 (1, 8)
- Recent Trend :
Pottawattamie County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate : The incidence rate is 6.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 3.8 to 11.3 and 3 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : 7 (1, 8)
- Recent Trend :
Adair County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Adams County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Allamakee County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Appanoose County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Audubon County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Benton County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Boone County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Bremer County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Buchanan County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Buena Vista County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Butler County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Calhoun County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Carroll County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Cass County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Cedar County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Cerro Gordo County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Cherokee County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Chickasaw County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clarke County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clay County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clayton County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Clinton County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Crawford County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Davis County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Decatur County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Delaware County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Des Moines County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Dickinson County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Dubuque County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Emmet County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Fayette County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Floyd County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Franklin County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Fremont County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Greene County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Grundy County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Guthrie County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hamilton County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hancock County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Hardin County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Harrison County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Henry County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Howard County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Humboldt County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ida County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Iowa County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jackson County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jasper County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jefferson County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Jones County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Keokuk County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Kossuth County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lee County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Louisa County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lucas County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Lyon County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Madison County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mahaska County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Marion County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Marshall County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mills County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Mitchell County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Monona County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Monroe County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Montgomery County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Muscatine County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
O'Brien County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Osceola County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Page County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Palo Alto County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Plymouth County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Pocahontas County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Poweshiek County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Ringgold County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sac County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Shelby County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Sioux County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Story County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Tama County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Taylor County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Union County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Van Buren County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Wapello County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Warren County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Washington County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Wayne County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Webster County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Winnebago County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Winneshiek County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Worth County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Wright County7
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : *
Notes:Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 7:46 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the
2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using
SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The
US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by
Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may
differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see
malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from
National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the
CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the
2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
1 Source:
National Program of Cancer Registries and
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.
7 Source:
SEER November 2024 submission.
* Data has been
suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.