Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 25.7 (24.6, 26.7) N/A 501 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Columbia County 2 Rural 18.9 (10.8, 31.8) 39 (8, 39) 3
*
*
Hempstead County 2 Rural 24.9 (13.9, 41.5) 25 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural 20.7 (11.1, 36.4) 36 (4, 39) 3
*
*
Drew County 2 Rural 32.3 (18.0, 53.5) 10 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 37.6 (21.2, 61.6) 3 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Poinsett County 2 Urban 20.9 (11.8, 34.9) 35 (4, 39) 3
*
*
Stone County 2 Rural 33.4 (18.3, 58.2) 8 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural 23.9 (13.0, 42.4) 26 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Arkansas County 2 Rural 29.9 (17.2, 49.0) 13 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 38.7 (22.2, 63.4) 1 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 29.1 (16.7, 47.3) 15 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.5, 6.8)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 23.1 (13.8, 37.1) 28 (3, 39) 4
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural 20.7 (12.5, 32.8) 37 (6, 39) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 3.8)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 22.8 (13.3, 37.3) 30 (3, 39) 5 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.2, 12.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 36.7 (22.8, 56.5) 4 (1, 38) 5
*
*
Sharp County 2 Rural 38.0 (22.6, 60.5) 2 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 5.9)
Johnson County 2 Rural 31.3 (19.8, 47.2) 11 (1, 39) 5 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.7, 7.6)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 25.6 (16.7, 38.0) 23 (2, 39) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.9, 7.8)
Miller County 2 Urban 19.2 (12.8, 28.2) 38 (12, 39) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 7.4)
Boone County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.1, 34.3) 27 (4, 39) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.4)
Independence County 2 Rural 33.3 (23.2, 46.3) 9 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 7.0)
Union County 2 Rural 29.2 (20.8, 40.3) 14 (1, 38) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.7, 6.9)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 33.8 (24.2, 46.2) 6 (1, 34) 9
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 33.7 (24.3, 45.6) 7 (1, 34) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.6, 7.3)
Pope County 2 Rural 25.2 (18.7, 33.5) 24 (5, 39) 10 rising rising trend 20.0 (4.1, 35.2)
Baxter County 2 Rural 26.4 (19.1, 36.3) 21 (3, 38) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.5)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 36.6 (27.3, 48.1) 5 (1, 29) 11 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.4, 10.0)
Crawford County 2 Urban 27.1 (20.4, 35.6) 19 (3, 38) 11 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.4, 6.8)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 27.5 (21.0, 35.6) 18 (3, 37) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 4.2)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 28.1 (21.3, 36.4) 16 (3, 37) 13 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 7.2)
White County 2 Rural 30.4 (23.7, 38.5) 12 (2, 33) 15 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.8, 7.1)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 22.1 (17.4, 27.7) 33 (12, 39) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 5.1)
Craighead County 2 Urban 26.0 (20.6, 32.5) 22 (6, 37) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.6)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 22.7 (18.1, 28.2) 31 (12, 39) 18 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 5.9)
Saline County 2 Urban 22.0 (17.5, 27.2) 34 (14, 39) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 5.0)
Garland County 2 Urban 22.7 (18.1, 28.3) 32 (12, 39) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 22.9 (19.3, 27.1) 29 (14, 38) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 27.8 (24.2, 31.8) 17 (7, 31) 44 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.1, 5.0)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 27.0 (24.2, 30.2) 20 (9, 30) 70 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.3, 3.6)
Ashley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bradley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conway County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cross County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Desha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Izard County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Francis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top