Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 20.5 (19.8, 21.2) N/A 708 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Covington County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.2, 20.3) 50 (19, 50) 4 stable stable trend -8.3 (-49.5, 5.3)
Colbert County 2 Urban 13.5 (9.0, 19.9) 49 (20, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.4, 2.3)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 15.6 (11.4, 21.0) 48 (17, 50) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3)
Walker County 2 Urban 16.0 (11.0, 22.7) 47 (11, 50) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.9)
Pike County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.2, 26.7) 46 (5, 50) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.4, 3.8)
Clarke County 2 Rural 16.3 (9.3, 27.8) 45 (4, 50) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.3, 6.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 16.6 (12.8, 21.3) 44 (15, 50) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Mobile County 2 Urban 16.7 (14.6, 19.0) 43 (25, 48) 48 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 16.7 (14.0, 19.8) 42 (22, 49) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Shelby County 2 Urban 16.8 (13.9, 20.3) 41 (20, 49) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.6)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 17.0 (11.8, 23.8) 40 (10, 50) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.5)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 17.5 (13.3, 22.9) 39 (12, 50) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.4)
Geneva County 2 Urban 17.8 (10.3, 29.2) 38 (3, 50) 4
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 17.8 (12.0, 25.7) 37 (6, 50) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.8)
Cullman County 2 Rural 18.4 (13.5, 24.6) 36 (7, 50) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.2, 27.9) 35 (4, 50) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.7)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 19.4 (16.1, 23.2) 34 (11, 47) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Limestone County 2 Urban 19.7 (15.2, 25.2) 33 (7, 49) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 3.1)
Dallas County 2 Rural 19.8 (13.5, 28.5) 32 (4, 50) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.7)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 19.8 (11.7, 31.5) 31 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural 20.0 (11.6, 33.0) 30 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural 20.1 (15.2, 26.1) 29 (6, 49) 12 stable stable trend 3.0 (0.0, 6.7)
Escambia County 2 Rural 20.1 (12.5, 31.0) 28 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.8, 3.9)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 20.2 (15.8, 25.4) 27 (6, 48) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 5.6)
Autauga County 2 Urban 20.3 (14.5, 27.8) 26 (4, 50) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 6.2)
Etowah County 2 Urban 20.5 (16.1, 25.9) 25 (6, 48) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Pickens County 2 Urban 20.7 (11.8, 35.4) 24 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural 20.8 (12.2, 33.4) 23 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.3)
Blount County 2 Urban 21.1 (15.0, 29.1) 22 (3, 49) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.0, 6.7)
Elmore County 2 Urban 21.4 (16.5, 27.6) 21 (4, 48) 13 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.8, 6.4)
Houston County 2 Urban 21.9 (17.2, 27.4) 20 (4, 45) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.4)
Talladega County 2 Rural 22.0 (16.7, 28.6) 19 (4, 47) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.6, 7.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 22.7 (20.7, 24.9) 18 (8, 30) 104 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.8)
Dale County 2 Rural 22.9 (16.0, 32.1) 17 (2, 49) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.5, 2.4)
Chilton County 2 Urban 23.0 (15.6, 33.0) 16 (1, 49) 7
*
*
Russell County 2 Urban 23.0 (16.7, 31.1) 15 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.8, 8.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 23.7 (13.5, 39.6) 14 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.8)
Lee County 2 Urban 23.9 (19.6, 28.9) 13 (3, 37) 23 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 6.6)
Marion County 2 Rural 24.0 (15.1, 36.7) 12 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.8, 6.6)
Madison County 2 Urban 24.3 (21.6, 27.3) 11 (4, 28) 62 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.1, 3.4)
Marengo County 2 Rural 24.9 (14.5, 40.7) 10 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.5, 9.1)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 25.2 (21.7, 29.0) 9 (3, 29) 40 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.9)
Hale County 2 Urban 27.7 (15.5, 46.8) 8 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Chambers County 2 Rural 28.0 (19.4, 39.5) 7 (1, 43) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.7, 8.2)
Randolph County 2 Rural 28.4 (17.0, 45.1) 6 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.9)
Coffee County 2 Rural 29.0 (21.0, 39.1) 5 (1, 38) 9 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.1, 10.2)
Macon County 2 Urban 30.1 (17.4, 49.1) 4 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.2)
Barbour County 2 Rural 30.5 (18.7, 47.3) 3 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Bibb County 2 Urban 31.8 (19.3, 49.8) 2 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Sumter County 2 Rural 39.1 (23.0, 64.2) 1 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Bullock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 10:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top