Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 30.4 (29.6, 31.3) N/A 1,120 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 30.1 (16.2, 53.1) 33 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Becker County 2 Rural 27.2 (18.1, 39.6) 49 (6, 59) 7
*
*
Beltrami County 2 Rural 28.5 (19.9, 39.8) 38 (6, 59) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-24.7, 11.4)
Brown County 2 Rural 43.6 (30.8, 60.5) 4 (1, 50) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.5, 1.8)
Cass County 2 Rural 27.4 (18.5, 40.1) 47 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.0)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 26.9 (20.6, 34.7) 51 (11, 59) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.2)
Douglas County 2 Rural 34.3 (24.8, 46.6) 18 (2, 57) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.2)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 28.7 (19.0, 42.1) 37 (4, 59) 7
*
*
Goodhue County 2 Rural 31.2 (23.1, 41.7) 24 (4, 58) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 4.1)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 23.2 (14.1, 37.5) 58 (9, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.3, 4.2)
Itasca County 2 Rural 31.0 (22.5, 42.1) 25 (4, 59) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.4)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 42.7 (26.2, 66.4) 5 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.1, 5.9)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 37.8 (27.9, 50.2) 11 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.3)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 36.5 (19.0, 64.9) 14 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural 30.9 (16.5, 56.3) 26 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Lyon County 2 Rural 42.6 (29.5, 59.9) 6 (1, 53) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 4.9)
Martin County 2 Rural 28.5 (17.8, 44.6) 39 (3, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.0, 2.5)
McLeod County 2 Rural 27.5 (19.1, 38.7) 46 (7, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.0)
Meeker County 2 Rural 26.1 (15.9, 41.1) 53 (4, 59) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.7)
Morrison County 2 Rural 37.3 (26.6, 51.1) 13 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.1)
Mower County 2 Rural 45.3 (33.8, 59.6) 2 (1, 42) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.5)
Nobles County 2 Rural 37.6 (23.2, 57.6) 12 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 5.3)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 27.3 (20.9, 35.3) 48 (10, 59) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.8)
Pine County 2 Rural 28.5 (18.3, 43.0) 40 (3, 59) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.7, 3.5)
Redwood County 2 Rural 44.6 (26.6, 70.6) 3 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.0)
Renville County 2 Rural 34.5 (19.5, 57.5) 16 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Rice County 2 Rural 29.1 (22.2, 37.7) 36 (8, 59) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 4.2)
Sibley County 2 Rural 33.4 (19.5, 54.7) 20 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Steele County 2 Rural 34.4 (24.7, 46.9) 17 (2, 58) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.1, 8.6)
Todd County 2 Rural 28.4 (17.8, 43.6) 42 (3, 59) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.3)
Waseca County 2 Rural 25.7 (15.0, 42.1) 55 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural 40.8 (22.8, 68.9) 8 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Winona County 2 Rural 31.7 (23.2, 42.7) 23 (4, 58) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.1)
Anoka County 2 Urban 30.2 (27.0, 33.7) 31 (14, 50) 69 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 24.4 (16.2, 35.3) 56 (12, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.2)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 30.6 (22.9, 40.0) 28 (6, 58) 12 falling falling trend -20.3 (-34.6, -2.7)
Carlton County 2 Urban 27.6 (18.7, 39.6) 45 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 4.0)
Carver County 2 Urban 26.5 (21.0, 33.0) 52 (15, 59) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.9)
Chisago County 2 Urban 27.9 (20.5, 37.2) 44 (8, 59) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 6.1)
Clay County 2 Urban 42.0 (32.9, 53.0) 7 (1, 40) 15 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.0, 7.5)
Dakota County 2 Urban 30.0 (27.1, 33.1) 34 (16, 50) 84 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 2.0)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 30.6 (18.9, 47.8) 27 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.3, 4.5)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 30.2 (28.5, 32.1) 32 (19, 44) 235 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Houston County 2 Urban 37.8 (24.1, 57.7) 10 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.8)
Isanti County 2 Urban 24.1 (16.2, 34.7) 57 (11, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.6)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 40.3 (28.3, 56.2) 9 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 7.7)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 34.8 (23.4, 50.3) 15 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.1, 5.5)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 34.2 (23.4, 48.6) 19 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.4)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 32.1 (27.1, 37.6) 22 (8, 51) 32 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 29.1 (19.3, 42.5) 35 (4, 59) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.8)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 33.0 (30.2, 35.9) 21 (11, 40) 111 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 0.8)
Rock County 2 Urban 56.3 (32.3, 92.4) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Urban 21.8 (17.4, 26.9) 59 (34, 59) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 3.5)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 25.9 (20.1, 33.0) 54 (14, 59) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.9)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 27.9 (24.0, 32.4) 43 (17, 56) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Stearns County 2 Urban 27.1 (22.4, 32.5) 50 (16, 58) 25 stable stable trend -5.0 (-16.0, 0.7)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 28.5 (18.0, 44.0) 41 (3, 59) 5
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban 30.4 (26.8, 34.5) 30 (12, 50) 53 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Wright County 2 Urban 30.5 (25.3, 36.5) 29 (10, 55) 25 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 4.1)
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 7:39 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top