Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 29.0 (28.3, 29.8) N/A 1,273 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Adams County 2 Rural 23.8 (15.4, 35.4) 67 (7, 80) 5 falling falling trend -13.0 (-27.4, -4.6)
Howard County 2 Urban 31.5 (25.0, 39.3) 27 (4, 71) 18 stable stable trend -10.5 (-19.8, 1.9)
Starke County 2 Rural 26.6 (16.6, 41.2) 60 (2, 80) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 0.6)
Owen County 2 Urban 24.3 (14.3, 39.5) 64 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.1, 2.4)
Wells County 2 Urban 24.0 (14.9, 36.9) 65 (5, 80) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.6, 1.4)
Clark County 2 Urban 29.2 (24.1, 35.2) 39 (9, 72) 24 stable stable trend -2.8 (-17.3, 1.4)
Marion County 2 Urban 28.3 (26.3, 30.4) 48 (26, 63) 158 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.3, 1.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 22.1 (14.8, 32.2) 75 (14, 80) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.3, 2.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 19.2 (10.7, 32.7) 78 (11, 80) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.9, 2.1)
Monroe County 2 Urban 22.3 (17.7, 27.7) 74 (31, 80) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 1.4)
Fountain County 2 Rural 33.0 (19.1, 53.7) 21 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.2, 3.6)
Fulton County 2 Rural 23.0 (13.2, 38.2) 71 (4, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.8, 4.0)
Daviess County 2 Rural 27.8 (17.7, 41.6) 54 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 3.0)
Marshall County 2 Rural 27.2 (19.4, 37.4) 57 (4, 79) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Cass County 2 Rural 18.1 (11.4, 27.8) 79 (30, 80) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.5)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 17.6 (12.0, 25.3) 80 (44, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.3)
Knox County 2 Rural 28.0 (18.9, 40.3) 52 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.9)
Harrison County 2 Urban 30.2 (21.4, 41.9) 33 (2, 79) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.9)
Jay County 2 Rural 41.7 (26.0, 63.4) 2 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 5.0)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 29.1 (25.6, 33.1) 40 (16, 67) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Whitley County 2 Urban 31.8 (22.5, 44.3) 25 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 4.2)
Vigo County 2 Urban 28.8 (22.9, 35.8) 44 (8, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 26.2 (19.8, 34.2) 62 (10, 79) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.6)
Noble County 2 Rural 28.3 (20.0, 39.0) 47 (4, 79) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.2)
Porter County 2 Urban 31.3 (26.8, 36.4) 28 (7, 65) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.8)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 28.7 (24.5, 33.3) 45 (14, 70) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 28.3 (20.8, 37.9) 49 (4, 79) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.1)
Clinton County 2 Rural 31.8 (21.3, 45.8) 26 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.4, 5.8)
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 29.6 (23.3, 37.3) 38 (6, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Shelby County 2 Urban 23.7 (16.7, 33.0) 68 (12, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 29.8 (23.4, 37.4) 36 (5, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Boone County 2 Urban 25.8 (19.4, 33.8) 63 (11, 79) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 4.2)
Henry County 2 Rural 23.5 (16.4, 32.9) 70 (12, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.9)
Ripley County 2 Rural 28.2 (18.4, 41.7) 50 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.3, 5.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 21.3 (17.2, 26.2) 76 (42, 80) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.1)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 35.0 (25.8, 46.6) 15 (1, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.4)
Steuben County 2 Rural 31.9 (22.9, 44.0) 24 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.6)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 31.0 (26.0, 36.7) 29 (7, 68) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.7)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 22.6 (19.8, 25.8) 72 (46, 78) 47 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.5)
Johnson County 2 Urban 27.7 (23.2, 32.8) 55 (14, 74) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.2)
Scott County 2 Rural 29.6 (18.3, 45.7) 37 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.3)
Decatur County 2 Rural 34.1 (22.4, 50.0) 18 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 27.3 (19.2, 37.9) 56 (4, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 29.0 (19.9, 41.3) 42 (3, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 22.6 (14.1, 34.8) 73 (8, 80) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.9, 5.7)
LaGrange County 2 Rural 36.3 (25.4, 50.5) 14 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.4)
Orange County 2 Rural 39.9 (25.9, 59.6) 5 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.8)
Rush County 2 Rural 32.1 (19.8, 50.7) 23 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 5.7)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 23.5 (19.5, 28.1) 69 (31, 79) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Wayne County 2 Rural 32.5 (25.5, 41.0) 22 (3, 70) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9)
Hancock County 2 Urban 30.3 (24.0, 37.9) 32 (5, 73) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 29.1 (18.3, 44.6) 41 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.3)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 28.1 (23.8, 33.0) 51 (14, 72) 31 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.7)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 30.2 (24.8, 36.6) 34 (7, 71) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.4)
Lake County 2 Urban 33.6 (30.8, 36.6) 20 (7, 41) 114 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.7)
Allen County 2 Urban 36.4 (33.0, 40.2) 12 (3, 34) 86 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 34.4 (27.4, 42.9) 17 (1, 66) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 5.1)
Delaware County 2 Urban 30.9 (25.1, 37.7) 30 (5, 70) 22 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.2)
Jasper County 2 Urban 30.9 (20.6, 44.7) 31 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.9, 7.8)
Floyd County 2 Urban 26.7 (20.6, 34.0) 58 (11, 78) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.4)
Huntington County 2 Rural 42.0 (30.9, 56.0) 1 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.8, 5.7)
Warrick County 2 Urban 26.6 (19.9, 35.0) 59 (7, 79) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.5, 7.2)
Miami County 2 Rural 28.6 (19.7, 40.8) 46 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.7, 13.1)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 29.8 (20.2, 42.7) 35 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.8)
Spencer County 2 Rural 23.9 (13.4, 40.4) 66 (2, 80) 3 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.0, 9.8)
Carroll County 2 Urban 37.9 (24.0, 57.6) 7 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 7.6)
Dubois County 2 Rural 28.0 (20.0, 38.4) 53 (5, 80) 9 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.3, 7.0)
Wabash County 2 Rural 36.6 (25.5, 51.1) 10 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 6.0)
Tipton County 2 Urban 38.7 (22.2, 63.4) 6 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.2, 11.2)
Gibson County 2 Rural 37.3 (26.0, 52.0) 9 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 9.0 (4.0, 30.0)
Brown County 2 Urban 29.0 (17.6, 47.7) 43 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban 34.4 (23.1, 49.8) 16 (1, 78) 6
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural 40.0 (26.8, 57.8) 4 (1, 74) 7
*
*
Jennings County 2 Rural 36.5 (24.9, 52.1) 11 (1, 77) 7
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban 37.8 (21.2, 63.3) 8 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural 33.7 (19.7, 54.5) 19 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Posey County 2 Urban 19.8 (10.8, 33.7) 77 (9, 80) 3
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Urban 40.3 (26.3, 60.1) 3 (1, 78) 6
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban 26.3 (16.9, 39.7) 61 (4, 80) 5
*
*
White County 2 Rural 36.4 (24.7, 52.3) 13 (1, 76) 7
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 10:22 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top