Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 25.7 (24.8, 26.7) N/A 632 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.3, 2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Logan County 2 Urban 15.6 (10.2, 23.1) 42 (23, 42) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.6)
Carter County 2 Rural 18.4 (12.0, 27.2) 40 (10, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.3, 3.9)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 16.4 (10.3, 25.2) 41 (14, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 2.5)
Bryan County 2 Rural 19.6 (13.1, 28.3) 39 (9, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 2.0)
McClain County 2 Urban 22.7 (15.1, 32.9) 36 (4, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 3.4)
Garfield County 2 Urban 26.2 (19.7, 34.3) 23 (3, 40) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.6)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 31.3 (22.3, 42.6) 5 (1, 39) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.5)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 24.5 (13.7, 41.5) 30 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.3, 6.6)
Kay County 2 Rural 29.7 (21.0, 41.0) 9 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.3)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 23.1 (19.9, 26.7) 35 (13, 39) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Grady County 2 Urban 26.6 (19.4, 35.8) 18 (2, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 4.8)
Mayes County 2 Rural 26.3 (17.5, 38.1) 22 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.4)
Canadian County 2 Urban 23.8 (19.4, 28.8) 33 (9, 40) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.6)
Creek County 2 Urban 21.2 (15.9, 27.8) 37 (10, 42) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.1)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 30.0 (19.9, 43.7) 7 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.3)
Rogers County 2 Urban 23.9 (18.5, 30.5) 32 (5, 41) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 25.1 (16.7, 36.6) 28 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.2, 5.8)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 25.3 (16.4, 37.4) 26 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.7)
Stephens County 2 Rural 27.0 (19.3, 37.1) 16 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 5.0)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 29.4 (20.5, 40.9) 11 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.8, 6.1)
Delaware County 2 Rural 26.6 (18.9, 36.9) 19 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 6.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 29.0 (17.2, 45.7) 13 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.7, 8.5)
Osage County 2 Urban 29.3 (21.0, 40.0) 12 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 4.9)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 25.4 (19.5, 32.6) 25 (4, 41) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.4)
Comanche County 2 Urban 26.0 (20.7, 32.4) 24 (4, 39) 17 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.5)
Caddo County 2 Rural 33.4 (20.9, 50.9) 4 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.6, 6.3)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 26.9 (20.1, 35.3) 17 (2, 40) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.9)
Payne County 2 Rural 29.8 (22.4, 38.9) 8 (1, 38) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.8)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 26.5 (24.3, 28.9) 20 (9, 32) 107 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.5)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 29.4 (20.0, 41.8) 10 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 28.8 (21.6, 37.9) 14 (1, 39) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 6.2)
Garvin County 2 Rural 23.3 (13.9, 37.1) 34 (2, 42) 4 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 6.3)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 27.2 (19.2, 37.5) 15 (2, 41) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.5, 7.2)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 26.4 (24.3, 28.6) 21 (10, 31) 121 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.2, 4.4)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 37.5 (29.7, 46.7) 2 (1, 24) 17 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.2, 9.2)
Adair County 2 Rural 34.2 (20.3, 54.1) 3 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Custer County 2 Rural 20.9 (11.6, 34.7) 38 (2, 42) 3
*
*
Haskell County 2 Rural 45.1 (25.1, 75.3) 1 (1, 40) 3
*
*
McCurtain County 2 Rural 24.5 (15.2, 37.6) 29 (2, 42) 5
*
*
Pawnee County 2 Urban 30.1 (17.5, 49.5) 6 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Seminole County 2 Rural 24.1 (14.7, 37.9) 31 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Woodward County 2 Rural 25.1 (14.1, 42.0) 27 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 7:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top