Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 25.4 (24.7, 26.1) N/A 1,167 stable stable trend -1.7 (-2.9, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.9 (27.8, 28.0) N/A 60,686 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Bedford County 2 Rural 24.8 (17.3, 34.6) 44 (5, 74) 8 stable stable trend -17.4 (-34.3, 2.9)
Cocke County 2 Rural 33.2 (23.2, 46.4) 11 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend -14.4 (-29.7, 2.9)
Sevier County 2 Rural 27.3 (21.9, 33.9) 28 (7, 66) 20 stable stable trend -3.8 (-20.3, 1.6)
Williamson County 2 Urban 22.3 (19.0, 26.1) 57 (26, 71) 34 stable stable trend -2.7 (-13.7, 1.2)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 19.3 (14.2, 26.2) 70 (23, 74) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Coffee County 2 Rural 25.9 (18.9, 34.8) 38 (5, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-16.7, 3.7)
McMinn County 2 Rural 21.6 (15.3, 30.0) 60 (11, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.6)
Haywood County 2 Rural 21.4 (12.6, 35.6) 63 (5, 74) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.6, 5.3)
Loudon County 2 Urban 20.0 (14.3, 27.8) 68 (14, 74) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.7)
Fayette County 2 Urban 19.6 (13.2, 28.6) 69 (14, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.2)
Henry County 2 Rural 18.3 (11.4, 28.6) 72 (14, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 25.5 (17.5, 36.0) 40 (3, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 20.3 (14.8, 27.5) 67 (18, 74) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.3)
McNairy County 2 Rural 33.5 (21.2, 50.6) 9 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.6)
Hardin County 2 Rural 26.9 (16.5, 41.9) 31 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 5.7)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 25.8 (18.9, 34.6) 39 (5, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Weakley County 2 Rural 25.1 (15.3, 38.7) 42 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 14.1 (8.1, 23.2) 74 (35, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 5.4)
Carter County 2 Urban 22.8 (16.7, 30.7) 56 (10, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.0)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 24.0 (21.2, 27.0) 48 (23, 65) 60 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Robertson County 2 Urban 23.1 (17.2, 30.5) 54 (11, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.7)
Gibson County 2 Urban 27.3 (20.0, 36.6) 29 (3, 72) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 26.7 (16.8, 41.2) 32 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 21.5 (16.1, 28.3) 62 (16, 74) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.5)
Rhea County 2 Rural 31.5 (21.7, 44.7) 15 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.8)
Bradley County 2 Urban 23.5 (18.6, 29.4) 52 (13, 72) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.9)
Knox County 2 Urban 21.0 (18.7, 23.4) 64 (39, 71) 66 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.8)
Madison County 2 Urban 28.8 (23.1, 35.6) 24 (5, 65) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.8)
Wilson County 2 Urban 22.8 (18.7, 27.6) 55 (20, 71) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 4.0)
Union County 2 Urban 25.4 (14.3, 42.4) 41 (1, 74) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.9, 7.8)
Campbell County 2 Urban 26.2 (18.3, 36.6) 35 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 5.0)
Davidson County 2 Urban 27.1 (24.8, 29.6) 30 (15, 50) 110 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.2, 2.9)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 29.3 (17.4, 47.7) 20 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.8, 8.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 26.4 (21.8, 31.6) 33 (10, 66) 27 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.2, 4.5)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 24.6 (21.4, 28.2) 46 (19, 66) 43 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.5)
Sumner County 2 Urban 23.9 (20.3, 28.2) 49 (18, 69) 32 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.7)
Dyer County 2 Rural 24.8 (16.7, 35.7) 45 (4, 74) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.0)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 23.8 (19.7, 28.4) 51 (16, 70) 25 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 5.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 26.3 (21.6, 31.8) 34 (10, 66) 24 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.7)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 28.8 (24.5, 33.6) 25 (7, 56) 36 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.4, 5.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 29.1 (20.7, 40.1) 23 (2, 72) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (0.0, 5.8)
Marshall County 2 Rural 33.8 (23.0, 48.0) 8 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 6.0)
Putnam County 2 Rural 28.6 (22.2, 36.5) 26 (4, 68) 15 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.5, 8.2)
Tipton County 2 Urban 29.2 (21.8, 38.6) 21 (2, 70) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 6.6)
Anderson County 2 Urban 25.0 (19.4, 32.0) 43 (9, 72) 15 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.4, 8.3)
Roane County 2 Urban 31.4 (24.1, 40.6) 16 (1, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 6.0)
Shelby County 2 Urban 28.5 (26.6, 30.6) 27 (12, 41) 168 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.1, 4.1)
Carroll County 2 Rural 32.7 (21.3, 48.2) 12 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.3, 6.8)
Giles County 2 Rural 18.9 (11.4, 30.0) 71 (12, 74) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 8.2)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 29.2 (16.6, 48.2) 22 (1, 74) 4 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 6.9)
Marion County 2 Urban 26.1 (16.6, 39.6) 36 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.1, 9.3)
Obion County 2 Rural 25.9 (16.4, 39.0) 37 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.0, 9.4)
Smith County 2 Urban 35.1 (21.8, 54.2) 6 (1, 73) 5 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.1, 9.4)
Franklin County 2 Rural 23.9 (16.3, 34.1) 50 (7, 74) 7 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.3, 9.8)
Dickson County 2 Urban 29.7 (22.1, 39.3) 19 (2, 68) 11 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.8)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 36.7 (24.6, 53.4) 5 (1, 70) 6 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.3, 10.2)
Maury County 2 Urban 31.9 (25.9, 38.8) 14 (2, 55) 22 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.4, 7.3)
Morgan County 2 Urban 30.4 (17.5, 49.7) 18 (1, 74) 4 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.4, 8.9)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 43.2 (31.1, 58.8) 1 (1, 42) 10 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.8, 9.7)
Warren County 2 Rural 21.5 (13.9, 32.0) 61 (7, 74) 5 rising rising trend 24.5 (0.7, 46.1)
White County 2 Rural 23.3 (13.8, 37.1) 53 (3, 74) 4 stable stable trend 27.7 (-1.3, 58.4)
Benton County 2 Rural 32.6 (17.9, 55.3) 13 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Cheatham County 2 Urban 17.8 (11.0, 27.5) 73 (15, 74) 5
*
*
Chester County 2 Urban 41.8 (27.1, 62.6) 2 (1, 66) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural 30.6 (17.8, 49.3) 17 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Fentress County 2 Rural 33.4 (19.8, 53.4) 10 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Henderson County 2 Rural 22.1 (13.4, 34.9) 59 (5, 74) 4
*
*
Hickman County 2 Urban 22.2 (12.7, 36.5) 58 (4, 74) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Urban 20.6 (14.9, 28.3) 66 (14, 74) 9
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural 37.4 (21.5, 62.0) 4 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban 35.0 (22.8, 51.7) 7 (1, 70) 6
*
*
Overton County 2 Rural 20.8 (12.1, 34.4) 65 (5, 74) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 24.6 (14.6, 39.6) 47 (2, 74) 4
*
*
Stewart County 2 Urban 38.8 (21.8, 64.6) 3 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Bledsoe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 2:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top