Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 9.2 (8.8, 9.5) N/A 599 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 10.0 (10.0, 10.1) N/A 20,555 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.7, -0.1)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 8.3 (6.6, 10.5) 41 (10, 50) 16 falling falling trend -15.4 (-28.2, -4.6)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 9.2 (5.4, 14.8) 28 (1, 51) 4 falling falling trend -10.1 (-31.8, -4.5)
Franklin County 2 Urban 8.4 (4.9, 13.6) 40 (2, 51) 4 falling falling trend -6.6 (-12.8, -1.7)
Orange County 2 Urban 9.7 (6.8, 13.4) 24 (2, 50) 8 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.7)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 7.9 (5.8, 10.4) 45 (11, 51) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.3)
Durham County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.1, 9.9) 46 (14, 51) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.6)
Lee County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.3, 18.4) 8 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.8, 1.5)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 9.0 (7.4, 11.0) 33 (9, 48) 22 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.7)
Burke County 2 Urban 7.8 (4.9, 12.0) 47 (5, 51) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.1)
Harnett County 2 Rural 8.0 (5.3, 11.6) 44 (6, 51) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.7)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 9.8) 39 (16, 47) 52 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.8, 11.5) 48 (6, 51) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.2, 1.0)
Iredell County 2 Urban 9.4 (7.0, 12.4) 26 (4, 50) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.4)
Johnston County 2 Urban 9.1 (6.8, 12.0) 30 (5, 50) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Randolph County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.2, 12.0) 38 (5, 51) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.1, 1.0)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 12.1 (8.4, 16.9) 7 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 0.7)
Alamance County 2 Urban 11.8 (9.0, 15.2) 9 (1, 42) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.1)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 8.0 (6.1, 10.5) 43 (11, 51) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.6)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 10.0 (5.5, 16.7) 20 (1, 51) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.0, 1.0)
Pitt County 2 Urban 7.5 (5.2, 10.5) 49 (11, 51) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.3)
Guilford County 2 Urban 9.8 (8.3, 11.5) 22 (7, 44) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 8.8 (5.6, 13.4) 36 (3, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 2.9)
Henderson County 2 Urban 10.2 (7.4, 14.0) 16 (2, 50) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.1)
Craven County 2 Rural 9.1 (6.0, 13.2) 32 (2, 51) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 2.3)
Wake County 2 Urban 9.8 (8.8, 11.0) 21 (9, 39) 60 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Carteret County 2 Rural 9.8 (6.1, 15.3) 23 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.4)
Catawba County 2 Urban 10.5 (7.8, 13.9) 10 (2, 48) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 10.1 (7.2, 13.8) 19 (2, 50) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.4)
Robeson County 2 Rural 5.3 (3.1, 8.4) 51 (24, 51) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 2.8)
Rowan County 2 Urban 9.1 (6.5, 12.5) 31 (4, 51) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.6)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 8.9 (7.0, 11.2) 35 (8, 50) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.2)
Davidson County 2 Urban 12.9 (9.9, 16.6) 4 (1, 36) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.6)
Union County 2 Urban 9.0 (6.9, 11.6) 34 (7, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.8)
Onslow County 2 Urban 13.9 (10.4, 18.1) 3 (1, 34) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.0, 4.7)
Wilson County 2 Rural 10.3 (6.6, 15.5) 12 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.2)
Gaston County 2 Urban 9.5 (7.4, 12.1) 25 (5, 49) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 14.4)
Surry County 2 Rural 14.5 (10.0, 20.4) 2 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.3)
Haywood County 2 Rural 10.2 (6.1, 16.2) 18 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 3.7)
Moore County 2 Urban 7.4 (4.5, 11.5) 50 (5, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 3.8)
Chatham County 2 Urban 12.3 (8.2, 17.9) 6 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 5.1)
Wayne County 2 Urban 10.3 (7.2, 14.4) 11 (2, 50) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.0)
Pender County 2 Urban 8.2 (4.8, 13.5) 42 (3, 51) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.1, 8.6)
Sampson County 2 Rural 9.3 (5.2, 15.4) 27 (1, 51) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.3, 7.7)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 14.6 (10.2, 20.4) 1 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 7.6)
Columbus County 2 Rural 10.2 (5.8, 17.0) 15 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Duplin County 2 Rural 10.3 (5.8, 17.1) 13 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural 10.2 (5.7, 17.7) 17 (1, 51) 4
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.4, 20.0) 5 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Nash County 2 Urban 8.7 (5.5, 13.1) 37 (3, 51) 5
*
*
Stokes County 2 Urban 9.2 (5.0, 16.0) 29 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural 10.2 (6.4, 15.8) 14 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Alexander County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 1:02 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top