Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
South Dakota 2 N/A 132.1 (127.8, 136.5) N/A 775 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 8.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Dewey County 2 Rural 204.3 (125.7, 313.7) 1 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.3, 7.8)
Douglas County 2 Rural 187.3 (112.9, 301.0) 2 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Oglala Lakota County 2 Rural 184.6 (123.9, 262.6) 3 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.4)
Kingsbury County 2 Rural 177.3 (123.1, 251.0) 4 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.8, 2.2)
Clark County 2 Rural 166.2 (101.2, 260.8) 5 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.5)
Minnehaha County 2 Urban 162.5 (150.9, 174.6) 6 (3, 19) 170 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 10.4)
Union County 2 Urban 161.2 (128.7, 200.0) 7 (1, 33) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.3)
Faulk County 2 Rural 160.0 (90.5, 278.3) 8 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Miner County 2 Rural 159.7 (93.2, 271.3) 9 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 5.0)
Beadle County 2 Rural 156.6 (126.3, 192.6) 10 (1, 34) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.2)
Hutchinson County 2 Rural 152.2 (109.8, 208.3) 11 (1, 42) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-9.4, -1.0)
Gregory County 2 Rural 150.6 (96.7, 230.1) 12 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.6)
Brookings County 2 Rural 149.7 (124.2, 179.0) 13 (3, 34) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.5)
Hand County 2 Rural 148.7 (87.1, 245.0) 14 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.5, 2.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 148.3 (111.4, 195.0) 15 (1, 41) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.8)
Grant County 2 Rural 146.1 (105.3, 200.1) 16 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend 10.0 (-1.3, 33.6)
Yankton County 2 Rural 144.1 (119.3, 173.1) 17 (3, 36) 25 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.3, 27.6)
Codington County 2 Rural 143.7 (120.6, 170.4) 18 (4, 35) 29 stable stable trend 7.1 (-1.0, 22.7)
McCook County 2 Urban 142.9 (93.4, 211.8) 19 (1, 45) 6
*
*
Bon Homme County 2 Rural 142.9 (101.0, 198.4) 20 (1, 43) 8 stable stable trend 9.8 (-0.7, 40.8)
Day County 2 Rural 141.2 (97.5, 203.1) 21 (1, 44) 7 rising rising trend 14.9 (4.3, 34.2)
Brule County 2 Rural 137.2 (86.7, 209.2) 22 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.5, 23.8)
Charles Mix County 2 Rural 133.3 (94.9, 183.4) 23 (2, 45) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.7)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 131.6 (114.4, 150.6) 24 (9, 38) 45 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.7)
Spink County 2 Rural 130.8 (88.7, 189.4) 25 (2, 45) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.2)
Brown County 2 Rural 130.7 (111.2, 153.0) 26 (8, 40) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Deuel County 2 Rural 125.9 (78.2, 197.3) 27 (2, 45) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.6, -0.1)
Todd County 2 Rural 124.5 (67.6, 206.0) 28 (1, 45) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.7, 3.6)
Edmunds County 2 Rural 124.3 (77.3, 196.8) 29 (2, 45) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.4)
Meade County 2 Urban 123.6 (101.8, 149.0) 30 (10, 42) 25 stable stable trend 8.4 (-1.0, 24.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 121.8 (87.1, 166.4) 31 (4, 45) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.3)
Hughes County 2 Rural 121.5 (94.7, 154.4) 32 (8, 44) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Tripp County 2 Rural 120.9 (79.8, 180.0) 33 (3, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Davison County 2 Rural 119.0 (94.5, 148.6) 34 (10, 44) 17 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.0, -2.3)
Fall River County 2 Rural 116.6 (85.3, 162.4) 35 (6, 45) 10 stable stable trend 21.5 (-0.8, 46.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 113.4 (93.5, 137.2) 36 (15, 44) 26 rising rising trend 22.1 (6.7, 34.6)
Pennington County 2 Urban 106.1 (95.7, 117.4) 37 (26, 43) 85 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.8, 19.9)
Hamlin County 2 Rural 104.3 (63.7, 163.1) 38 (5, 45) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.4)
Roberts County 2 Rural 104.3 (73.6, 145.2) 39 (10, 45) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 1.6)
Custer County 2 Urban 102.7 (76.7, 141.3) 40 (15, 45) 11 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.6, 22.5)
Moody County 2 Rural 99.5 (62.7, 153.0) 41 (8, 45) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 4.0)
Butte County 2 Rural 94.5 (66.2, 132.8) 42 (16, 45) 8 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.6, 27.9)
Marshall County 2 Rural 90.5 (53.3, 150.0) 43 (10, 45) 4
*
*
Turner County 2 Urban 88.6 (57.3, 132.7) 44 (15, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.0, -0.1)
Walworth County 2 Rural 82.1 (47.7, 136.2) 45 (16, 45) 4 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -1.9)
Aurora County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bennett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Corson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haakon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hanson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jerauld County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mellette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanborn County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 1:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top