Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 2 N/A 102.2 (100.6, 103.8) N/A 3,434 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Phillips County 2 Rural 97.6 (56.1, 163.0) 21 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.6)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 82.1 (48.1, 133.8) 38 (3, 50) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.0, -2.0)
Conejos County 2 Rural 72.1 (44.1, 114.0) 46 (6, 50) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -0.7)
Yuma County 2 Rural 65.4 (40.0, 101.8) 48 (9, 50) 4 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.0, -2.5)
Rio Blanco County 2 Rural 87.6 (53.7, 137.9) 34 (3, 50) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.4, -2.3)
Kit Carson County 2 Rural 81.9 (51.4, 127.0) 39 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.5, 0.0)
Custer County 2 Rural 88.0 (50.4, 154.4) 33 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.8, 0.4)
Ouray County 2 Rural 83.3 (51.9, 139.8) 36 (3, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.6, 1.5)
Saguache County 2 Rural 78.7 (48.5, 126.5) 42 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 1.0)
Lake County 2 Rural 100.6 (64.1, 152.4) 15 (2, 50) 5
*
*
San Miguel County 2 Rural 78.4 (50.9, 120.3) 43 (5, 50) 5
*
*
Alamosa County 2 Rural 60.9 (40.0, 89.4) 50 (20, 50) 6 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.1, -2.3)
Clear Creek County 2 Urban 72.9 (49.0, 108.4) 44 (8, 50) 7 stable stable trend 16.1 (-10.7, 40.3)
Prowers County 2 Rural 90.1 (61.8, 127.7) 29 (3, 50) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.7)
Huerfano County 2 Rural 98.8 (66.6, 147.3) 17 (2, 50) 8 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.2, -1.6)
Moffat County 2 Rural 78.9 (55.2, 110.6) 41 (7, 50) 8 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -2.4)
Rio Grande County 2 Rural 102.9 (73.6, 141.5) 12 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.7, 3.1)
Las Animas County 2 Rural 68.2 (49.4, 93.7) 47 (18, 50) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.9)
Gunnison County 2 Rural 98.3 (72.8, 130.6) 19 (3, 48) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.0, 18.3)
Logan County 2 Rural 79.5 (59.9, 103.8) 40 (10, 50) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -2.7)
Otero County 2 Rural 94.3 (71.5, 122.7) 27 (5, 49) 12 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.9, 0.3)
Grand County 2 Rural 94.8 (70.3, 126.4) 25 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.7, 0.9)
Morgan County 2 Rural 72.9 (55.9, 93.6) 45 (19, 50) 13 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.2, 2.9)
Archuleta County 2 Rural 97.4 (75.2, 127.1) 22 (4, 47) 15 rising rising trend 21.0 (9.6, 42.4)
Pitkin County 2 Rural 98.3 (77.2, 125.0) 18 (5, 46) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.5)
Park County 2 Urban 89.7 (69.1, 116.5) 31 (6, 49) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -0.9)
Elbert County 2 Urban 91.2 (72.9, 113.6) 28 (6, 47) 20 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.5)
Teller County 2 Urban 84.5 (67.2, 106.1) 35 (9, 49) 21 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.9, -3.6)
Montezuma County 2 Rural 99.6 (81.0, 121.9) 16 (5, 43) 22 rising rising trend 8.6 (2.4, 23.7)
Fremont County 2 Rural 63.5 (52.9, 76.0) 49 (36, 50) 26 falling falling trend -7.2 (-17.4, -5.0)
Delta County 2 Rural 95.0 (80.0, 112.8) 23 (7, 44) 30 stable stable trend 6.8 (-3.0, 27.6)
Chaffee County 2 Rural 158.6 (133.3, 188.7) 2 (1, 8) 30 stable stable trend 5.2 (-1.5, 19.0)
Summit County 2 Rural 136.7 (114.8, 162.2) 4 (1, 16) 30 rising rising trend 11.7 (0.5, 38.2)
Montrose County 2 Rural 82.8 (69.9, 98.0) 37 (15, 48) 31 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 13.4)
Routt County 2 Rural 180.1 (152.9, 211.5) 1 (1, 4) 35 rising rising trend 11.7 (0.7, 34.6)
Eagle County 2 Rural 117.0 (100.2, 135.9) 7 (3, 29) 40 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.6)
Broomfield County 2 Urban 97.7 (84.4, 112.6) 20 (7, 40) 41 stable stable trend -6.2 (-12.9, 0.1)
Garfield County 2 Rural 126.0 (108.8, 145.2) 6 (2, 21) 45 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.9, 17.0)
La Plata County 2 Rural 129.8 (113.9, 147.6) 5 (2, 14) 54 rising rising trend 9.0 (4.7, 17.4)
Mesa County 2 Urban 94.4 (86.4, 103.1) 26 (12, 38) 108 stable stable trend 6.5 (-4.1, 18.3)
Pueblo County 2 Urban 101.3 (93.0, 110.2) 14 (8, 33) 117 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.3)
Weld County 2 Urban 105.7 (98.6, 113.3) 10 (7, 27) 178 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.8, 16.3)
Adams County 2 Urban 88.1 (82.4, 94.0) 32 (21, 41) 206 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 11.9)
Boulder County 2 Urban 109.4 (102.6, 116.5) 8 (6, 23) 210 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.2, 14.7)
Douglas County 2 Urban 106.9 (100.3, 113.9) 9 (7, 25) 211 stable stable trend 3.1 (-5.5, 16.5)
Larimer County 2 Urban 138.5 (131.4, 145.9) 3 (2, 7) 307 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 1.2)
Arapahoe County 2 Urban 94.8 (90.1, 99.7) 24 (16, 35) 332 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 8.1)
El Paso County 2 Urban 90.1 (85.7, 94.6) 30 (20, 39) 343 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.1, -4.6)
Denver County 2 Urban 105.2 (100.1, 110.4) 11 (8, 25) 351 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.7, -1.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 102.8 (98.2, 107.7) 13 (9, 26) 396 falling falling trend -7.6 (-13.4, -2.3)
Baca County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 11:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top