Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 2 N/A 21.6 (20.8, 22.5) N/A 578 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.8) N/A 77,545 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.6)
McDowell County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.4, 18.4) 46 (29, 46) 4 falling falling trend -17.2 (-43.5, -6.3)
Boone County 2 Urban 21.6 (14.8, 31.1) 26 (1, 45) 7 falling falling trend -6.3 (-25.1, -0.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 16.6 (9.6, 28.1) 39 (3, 46) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.3, 1.5)
Mineral County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.9, 17.9) 45 (31, 46) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 1.1)
Mercer County 2 Rural 22.2 (17.9, 27.3) 21 (3, 39) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-11.6, -0.2)
Putnam County 2 Urban 21.6 (17.2, 26.9) 27 (4, 41) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.8)
Lewis County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.8, 25.6) 42 (5, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.3)
Grant County 2 Rural 18.0 (10.6, 30.1) 36 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.1, 3.2)
Wood County 2 Urban 20.2 (16.8, 24.2) 30 (8, 42) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Nicholas County 2 Rural 16.4 (11.1, 23.9) 40 (9, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 1.8)
Roane County 2 Rural 25.6 (17.3, 37.7) 9 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Greenbrier County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.1, 24.0) 37 (9, 45) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.6)
Morgan County 2 Urban 18.3 (12.2, 27.5) 35 (3, 46) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 3.0)
Hampshire County 2 Urban 22.8 (16.4, 31.4) 18 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Hancock County 2 Urban 22.5 (16.9, 29.7) 20 (2, 43) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.8)
Cabell County 2 Urban 17.4 (14.3, 21.0) 38 (19, 44) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.1)
Marion County 2 Rural 21.7 (17.3, 27.0) 25 (3, 41) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Monongalia County 2 Urban 21.3 (17.3, 26.0) 28 (5, 41) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Upshur County 2 Rural 15.6 (10.4, 23.1) 43 (10, 46) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 20.0 (14.5, 27.2) 32 (3, 45) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.5)
Raleigh County 2 Urban 20.2 (16.6, 24.4) 31 (7, 42) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 23.0 (19.5, 27.0) 17 (3, 36) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Hardy County 2 Rural 18.5 (11.2, 29.6) 34 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.0, 4.9)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 25.1 (20.1, 31.1) 11 (1, 37) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 26.0 (19.7, 34.0) 7 (1, 38) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Tyler County 2 Rural 29.2 (16.7, 48.8) 2 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.3)
Mingo County 2 Rural 20.8 (14.1, 29.8) 29 (1, 45) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.1, 5.7)
Harrison County 2 Rural 25.6 (21.3, 30.7) 8 (1, 33) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Marshall County 2 Urban 25.5 (19.4, 33.2) 10 (1, 39) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.3)
Ohio County 2 Urban 24.7 (19.5, 31.1) 13 (1, 38) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Kanawha County 2 Urban 23.7 (21.1, 26.5) 16 (5, 31) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Wyoming County 2 Rural 26.5 (18.7, 36.8) 5 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.4)
Logan County 2 Rural 21.8 (16.2, 29.0) 24 (2, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Braxton County 2 Rural 22.6 (14.1, 35.3) 19 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.9)
Fayette County 2 Urban 23.8 (18.5, 30.3) 15 (1, 40) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.8)
Brooke County 2 Urban 21.9 (15.5, 30.6) 22 (1, 44) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 5.3)
Mason County 2 Rural 26.1 (19.3, 34.9) 6 (1, 40) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.9)
Preston County 2 Urban 21.8 (16.2, 29.0) 23 (2, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Wayne County 2 Urban 27.2 (21.7, 34.0) 4 (1, 32) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 25.0 (17.4, 35.1) 12 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 5.1)
Barbour County 2 Rural 28.2 (19.2, 40.5) 3 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 8.1 (-0.7, 29.3)
Pocahontas County 2 Rural 24.0 (12.9, 42.5) 14 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Summers County 2 Rural 16.2 (9.6, 27.4) 41 (4, 46) 4
*
*
Taylor County 2 Rural 19.7 (12.6, 30.2) 33 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Tucker County 2 Rural 30.0 (17.3, 51.3) 1 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Wetzel County 2 Rural 12.6 (7.2, 21.6) 44 (20, 46) 3
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 7:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top