Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban ascending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 18.9 (18.5, 19.4) N/A 1,515 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.4, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.8) N/A 77,545 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.6)
Andrew County 2 Urban 19.0 (12.3, 28.5) 58 (2, 87) 5
*
*
Bollinger County 2 Urban 27.8 (17.1, 43.5) 4 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Boone County 2 Urban 20.5 (17.6, 23.7) 41 (11, 74) 37 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.4)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 24.6 (20.5, 29.4) 11 (1, 59) 26 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.9, 16.7)
Callaway County 2 Urban 22.6 (17.3, 29.1) 24 (2, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 22.9 (18.9, 27.6) 20 (4, 70) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 5.1)
Cass County 2 Urban 16.3 (13.4, 19.6) 73 (33, 86) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.7)
Christian County 2 Urban 21.0 (17.2, 25.4) 37 (7, 77) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.4)
Clay County 2 Urban 21.3 (18.9, 23.9) 34 (12, 62) 62 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Clinton County 2 Urban 20.3 (13.5, 29.7) 43 (2, 87) 6
*
*
Cole County 2 Urban 19.7 (16.0, 24.1) 50 (11, 82) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Cooper County 2 Urban 15.6 (9.3, 25.1) 80 (6, 87) 4
*
*
Dallas County 2 Urban 20.2 (12.6, 31.0) 45 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 4.0)
DeKalb County 2 Urban 19.1 (10.8, 32.1) 57 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 20.1 (16.9, 23.9) 46 (12, 76) 29 stable stable trend -11.6 (-26.1, 2.0)
Greene County 2 Urban 19.3 (17.3, 21.4) 54 (24, 71) 72 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.5)
Jackson County 2 Urban 16.2 (15.0, 17.5) 75 (53, 81) 137 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Jasper County 2 Urban 25.1 (21.6, 29.1) 8 (2, 48) 37 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 13.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 21.9 (19.4, 24.6) 30 (10, 61) 60 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.7)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 20.8 (15.3, 27.9) 39 (3, 85) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.6)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 17.1 (12.8, 22.5) 69 (15, 87) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.2)
Moniteau County 2 Urban 22.8 (14.0, 35.3) 21 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban 14.6 (11.1, 19.0) 84 (35, 87) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.4)
Osage County 2 Urban 18.3 (10.6, 30.1) 61 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Platte County 2 Urban 17.5 (14.3, 21.1) 64 (23, 85) 22 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 22.7 (16.8, 30.3) 23 (1, 82) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 6.0)
Ray County 2 Urban 19.1 (13.2, 27.3) 55 (3, 87) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.3, 3.2)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 17.1 (15.5, 18.9) 70 (42, 80) 85 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.9, -3.4)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 14.0 (12.2, 16.0) 85 (62, 87) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 17.5 (16.5, 18.5) 65 (47, 75) 241 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Warren County 2 Urban 20.8 (15.1, 28.0) 40 (3, 85) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.4)
Webster County 2 Urban 24.8 (18.7, 32.3) 10 (1, 76) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.2)
Adair County 2 Rural 10.9 (6.2, 18.1) 87 (41, 87) 3 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.9, 1.5)
Audrain County 2 Rural 18.4 (12.4, 26.5) 59 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.8)
Barry County 2 Rural 22.8 (17.3, 29.6) 22 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.2)
Barton County 2 Rural 17.2 (9.8, 29.1) 67 (3, 87) 3
*
*
Benton County 2 Rural 21.1 (15.3, 29.6) 36 (2, 84) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.9)
Butler County 2 Rural 16.0 (11.7, 21.4) 78 (19, 87) 10 stable stable trend -16.6 (-44.2, 2.6)
Camden County 2 Rural 24.2 (19.5, 30.1) 16 (2, 66) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 3.0)
Cedar County 2 Rural 19.4 (12.5, 29.8) 53 (2, 87) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.2)
Chariton County 2 Rural 29.4 (16.7, 49.6) 3 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.2, 23.5) 79 (10, 87) 5 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.6, -2.5)
Daviess County 2 Rural 26.6 (15.4, 44.2) 5 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Dent County 2 Rural 17.7 (10.6, 28.4) 63 (3, 87) 4
*
*
Dunklin County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.4, 22.3) 81 (16, 87) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.5, 1.3)
Gasconade County 2 Rural 20.1 (13.2, 30.3) 47 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.7, 0.9)
Harrison County 2 Rural 25.7 (14.7, 43.2) 7 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural 19.8 (13.7, 28.1) 49 (3, 86) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.3, 5.3)
Howell County 2 Rural 17.2 (12.7, 22.8) 68 (13, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.3)
Iron County 2 Rural 30.5 (18.6, 48.2) 1 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural 17.4 (12.7, 23.4) 66 (11, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Laclede County 2 Rural 16.1 (11.4, 22.3) 76 (15, 87) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.2, -0.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 20.8 (15.6, 27.5) 38 (3, 83) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.6)
Linn County 2 Rural 22.3 (13.1, 36.2) 28 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.0, 7.8)
Livingston County 2 Rural 19.6 (12.2, 30.5) 52 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural 15.1 (9.0, 24.6) 83 (8, 87) 4
*
*
Madison County 2 Rural 22.5 (13.8, 35.4) 25 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.7, 4.0)
Marion County 2 Rural 21.2 (15.1, 29.2) 35 (2, 85) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 7.0)
McDonald County 2 Rural 22.5 (15.2, 32.3) 26 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Miller County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.0, 28.6) 44 (2, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.9)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 24.3 (14.9, 38.0) 15 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.5, 5.5)
Monroe County 2 Rural 29.7 (18.1, 47.4) 2 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 17.9 (10.1, 30.5) 62 (2, 87) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.2, 2.3)
Morgan County 2 Rural 17.0 (11.7, 24.7) 72 (9, 87) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.6)
New Madrid County 2 Rural 24.3 (16.2, 35.6) 14 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 21.5 (14.1, 31.9) 31 (1, 87) 6
*
*
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 16.1 (9.3, 26.5) 77 (4, 87) 3
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural 22.0 (14.6, 32.3) 29 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.1)
Pettis County 2 Rural 25.1 (19.3, 32.1) 9 (1, 73) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.5, 4.1)
Phelps County 2 Rural 19.7 (14.7, 25.9) 51 (5, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 12.2)
Pike County 2 Rural 23.3 (15.5, 34.2) 19 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural 18.3 (12.8, 25.4) 60 (5, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.1)
Randolph County 2 Rural 19.8 (13.5, 28.3) 48 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.8)
Ripley County 2 Rural 19.1 (11.1, 31.9) 56 (1, 87) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.0)
Saline County 2 Rural 24.3 (17.2, 33.8) 13 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 6.0)
Scott County 2 Rural 26.2 (20.4, 33.4) 6 (1, 68) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 14.8)
St. Clair County 2 Rural 24.0 (14.5, 39.3) 17 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.8)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 21.5 (17.2, 26.6) 32 (5, 76) 18 falling falling trend -10.2 (-27.0, -1.5)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 22.4 (15.2, 32.4) 27 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 2.1)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 24.4 (18.2, 32.4) 12 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.1)
Stone County 2 Rural 21.4 (16.6, 27.9) 33 (3, 79) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 2.1)
Taney County 2 Rural 24.0 (19.3, 29.5) 18 (2, 68) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Texas County 2 Rural 13.6 (8.9, 20.5) 86 (24, 87) 5 falling falling trend -8.0 (-33.7, -1.1)
Vernon County 2 Rural 15.2 (9.4, 23.8) 82 (7, 87) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.1)
Washington County 2 Rural 20.4 (13.9, 29.2) 42 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 4.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 16.3 (9.2, 28.3) 74 (3, 87) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 4.0)
Wright County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.6, 26.4) 71 (4, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.8, 3.7)
Atchison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/31/2026 9:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top