Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 20.2 (19.7, 20.6) N/A 1,672 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.7, -2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.8) N/A 77,545 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.6)
Adams County 2 Rural 16.3 (11.2, 23.0) 75 (12, 87) 7 falling falling trend -12.9 (-20.7, -7.6)
Allen County 2 Urban 18.7 (16.9, 20.6) 60 (32, 76) 82 falling falling trend -1.6 (-8.6, -0.2)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 21.7 (17.8, 26.3) 35 (6, 77) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 26.8 (15.2, 44.7) 8 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural 21.3 (13.2, 33.7) 37 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.6)
Boone County 2 Urban 18.7 (14.5, 23.7) 59 (12, 85) 14 falling falling trend -13.2 (-20.2, -3.1)
Brown County 2 Urban 23.2 (15.6, 34.3) 25 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 11.7 (6.8, 19.1) 86 (35, 87) 4 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.2, 0.1)
Cass County 2 Rural 17.6 (12.9, 23.7) 70 (11, 87) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.4)
Clark County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.7, 13.7) 87 (77, 87) 17 falling falling trend -16.6 (-24.6, -11.9)
Clay County 2 Urban 23.3 (16.7, 31.9) 21 (1, 84) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.6)
Clinton County 2 Rural 18.2 (12.9, 25.2) 63 (6, 87) 8 falling falling trend -19.5 (-28.9, -10.8)
Daviess County 2 Rural 17.5 (12.0, 24.8) 71 (8, 87) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.4)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 18.2 (13.4, 24.2) 65 (8, 87) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -1.0)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 19.9 (15.4, 25.4) 48 (8, 84) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Decatur County 2 Rural 30.4 (22.6, 40.3) 2 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.3)
Delaware County 2 Urban 25.6 (22.0, 29.7) 12 (2, 51) 37 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Dubois County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.0, 22.3) 74 (16, 87) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 6.8)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 15.3 (13.1, 17.8) 80 (53, 86) 36 falling falling trend -10.6 (-20.9, -2.5)
Fayette County 2 Rural 25.9 (18.5, 35.5) 11 (1, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 6.3)
Floyd County 2 Urban 16.0 (12.6, 20.0) 78 (29, 86) 16 falling falling trend -34.5 (-50.2, -20.4)
Fountain County 2 Rural 27.7 (18.9, 39.7) 5 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.8)
Franklin County 2 Urban 17.8 (11.9, 26.1) 68 (4, 87) 6
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural 17.8 (11.6, 26.5) 69 (5, 87) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.7)
Gibson County 2 Rural 27.1 (20.4, 35.4) 7 (1, 72) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.9)
Grant County 2 Rural 21.7 (17.7, 26.5) 34 (5, 78) 21 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 25.3 (19.1, 33.1) 16 (1, 75) 12 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 13.4)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 19.0 (17.0, 21.2) 55 (27, 76) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Hancock County 2 Urban 20.3 (16.5, 24.7) 44 (9, 80) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.1)
Harrison County 2 Urban 14.6 (10.2, 20.4) 82 (25, 87) 7 falling falling trend -25.3 (-41.8, -6.5)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 20.2 (17.4, 23.3) 45 (15, 75) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Henry County 2 Rural 18.6 (14.3, 24.0) 61 (11, 85) 13 stable stable trend -27.5 (-47.8, 0.4)
Howard County 2 Urban 19.6 (16.2, 23.7) 50 (12, 80) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.2)
Huntington County 2 Rural 20.9 (15.6, 27.6) 40 (4, 84) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 18.5 (13.7, 24.4) 62 (8, 86) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.9)
Jasper County 2 Urban 23.7 (17.7, 31.4) 20 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.6)
Jay County 2 Rural 20.2 (13.3, 29.6) 46 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.6)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 19.0 (13.5, 26.2) 54 (6, 86) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 4.0)
Jennings County 2 Rural 23.1 (16.4, 31.8) 26 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 4.3)
Johnson County 2 Urban 23.2 (20.2, 26.6) 24 (6, 62) 44 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.4)
Knox County 2 Rural 18.2 (13.4, 24.5) 64 (9, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.3)
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 20.7 (16.8, 25.2) 42 (9, 79) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
LaGrange County 2 Rural 22.5 (16.6, 29.9) 29 (2, 84) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.5)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 24.0 (20.5, 27.9) 18 (4, 61) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Lake County 2 Urban 21.3 (19.7, 23.0) 38 (19, 59) 138 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 20.1 (15.5, 25.8) 47 (6, 83) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.3)
Madison County 2 Urban 23.9 (20.7, 27.4) 19 (4, 59) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Marion County 2 Urban 19.3 (18.0, 20.6) 52 (34, 70) 182 falling falling trend -9.0 (-13.3, -3.8)
Marshall County 2 Rural 20.4 (15.4, 26.5) 43 (4, 84) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-9.3, -0.2)
Miami County 2 Rural 26.6 (20.5, 34.1) 9 (1, 70) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Monroe County 2 Urban 16.0 (13.2, 19.3) 77 (38, 86) 23 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.7, 14.6)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.8, 25.0) 57 (9, 86) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 27.7 (23.0, 33.1) 6 (1, 45) 26 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.8)
Newton County 2 Urban 14.0 (7.9, 23.9) 83 (11, 87) 3 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.8)
Noble County 2 Rural 15.9 (11.6, 21.4) 79 (19, 87) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.4)
Ohio County 2 Urban 36.9 (21.2, 62.0) 1 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Orange County 2 Rural 21.8 (14.1, 32.4) 33 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.9, 8.2)
Owen County 2 Urban 25.3 (17.9, 35.2) 15 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.8)
Parke County 2 Rural 29.3 (20.5, 41.2) 4 (1, 76) 7 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.5, 10.1)
Perry County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.5, 22.3) 84 (15, 87) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.4, 2.4)
Pike County 2 Rural 20.9 (12.4, 33.8) 41 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Porter County 2 Urban 21.4 (18.7, 24.4) 36 (12, 69) 49 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.2)
Posey County 2 Urban 18.0 (12.2, 26.0) 66 (6, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.4)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 26.5 (16.9, 40.4) 10 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Putnam County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.5, 25.4) 58 (6, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 22.5 (16.1, 31.0) 28 (2, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 13.3)
Ripley County 2 Rural 19.2 (13.4, 26.8) 53 (4, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.6)
Rush County 2 Rural 16.2 (9.8, 25.8) 76 (7, 87) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 17.8 (11.8, 26.1) 67 (5, 87) 6 falling falling trend -16.5 (-29.7, -4.6)
Shelby County 2 Urban 22.1 (17.1, 28.2) 30 (3, 80) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.4)
Spencer County 2 Rural 12.6 (7.6, 20.2) 85 (29, 87) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.8, -0.1)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 18.8 (16.7, 21.1) 56 (28, 77) 63 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Starke County 2 Rural 23.0 (16.2, 32.1) 27 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.2)
Steuben County 2 Rural 19.9 (14.7, 26.6) 49 (5, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 16.8 (10.6, 25.8) 73 (6, 87) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.0, 1.7)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 21.3 (18.2, 24.7) 39 (10, 73) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.5)
Tipton County 2 Urban 30.1 (21.0, 42.6) 3 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.2)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 21.9 (19.3, 24.9) 32 (10, 65) 52 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.3, -1.0)
Vermillion County 2 Urban 25.5 (17.1, 37.3) 13 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.7)
Vigo County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.7, 27.4) 22 (4, 68) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Wabash County 2 Rural 25.4 (19.2, 33.3) 14 (1, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Warrick County 2 Urban 19.6 (15.6, 24.4) 51 (10, 82) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.4)
Washington County 2 Urban 15.0 (9.8, 22.1) 81 (16, 87) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.2)
Wayne County 2 Rural 24.2 (20.0, 29.1) 17 (3, 67) 24 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.7)
Wells County 2 Urban 16.9 (11.5, 24.1) 72 (9, 87) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.3, -0.2)
White County 2 Rural 23.2 (16.8, 31.8) 23 (1, 83) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.7)
Whitley County 2 Urban 22.1 (16.3, 29.4) 31 (2, 83) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.2)
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 6:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top