Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Union County 2 Rural 10.5 (6.2, 16.9) 28 (10, 28) 4 falling falling trend -16.4 (-43.4, -2.1)
Jackson County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.2, 18.5) 18 (6, 25) 51 stable stable trend -2.7 (-18.2, 2.6)
Deschutes County 2 Urban 13.0 (11.0, 15.1) 27 (16, 28) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Yamhill County 2 Urban 17.5 (14.4, 21.0) 12 (2, 25) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 1.2)
Linn County 2 Urban 18.1 (15.2, 21.4) 10 (1, 24) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-12.5, 4.3)
Lane County 2 Urban 14.7 (13.2, 16.4) 22 (12, 27) 76 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Tillamook County 2 Rural 16.2 (10.3, 24.5) 19 (1, 28) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.3)
Multnomah County 2 Urban 14.9 (13.8, 16.1) 21 (13, 26) 134 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Washington County 2 Urban 14.5 (13.2, 15.9) 23 (14, 27) 97 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 2.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 18.5 (14.8, 22.9) 7 (1, 25) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.8)
Clackamas County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.8, 17.9) 17 (7, 24) 91 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.1)
Coos County 2 Rural 22.4 (18.0, 27.6) 1 (1, 16) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 16.1 (11.9, 21.4) 20 (1, 28) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.2)
Umatilla County 2 Rural 17.0 (13.3, 21.4) 13 (1, 27) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.1)
Klamath County 2 Rural 17.6 (13.7, 22.2) 11 (1, 27) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 14.5 (11.3, 18.4) 24 (6, 28) 16 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 5.0)
Curry County 2 Rural 19.0 (13.0, 27.6) 5 (1, 27) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.8)
Douglas County 2 Rural 16.9 (14.0, 20.3) 14 (3, 26) 29 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.3)
Columbia County 2 Urban 18.5 (14.2, 23.7) 9 (1, 26) 14 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Marion County 2 Urban 19.9 (18.0, 22.0) 3 (1, 14) 80 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.1, 3.3)
Hood River County 2 Rural 16.6 (10.4, 25.2) 15 (1, 28) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.5, 8.4)
Wasco County 2 Rural 19.7 (13.4, 28.2) 4 (1, 27) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.5, 6.2)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 18.6 (12.0, 27.8) 6 (1, 28) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.7, 8.9)
Josephine County 2 Urban 20.5 (17.1, 24.5) 2 (1, 18) 30 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.0, 7.3)
Clatsop County 2 Rural 18.5 (13.4, 25.0) 8 (1, 27) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.1)
Baker County 2 Rural 13.5 (7.5, 22.9) 25 (1, 28) 4
*
*
Crook County 2 Urban 16.5 (10.9, 24.3) 16 (1, 28) 7
*
*
Malheur County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.4, 20.1) 26 (3, 28) 5
*
*
Gilliam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harney County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 11:39 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top