Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Allen County 7 Urban 22.7 (14.9, 33.4) 55 (2, 98) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 4.3)
Ballard County 7 Urban 33.1 (18.8, 55.0) 2 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Boone County 7 Urban 20.2 (17.1, 23.7) 76 (28, 92) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.9)
Bourbon County 7 Urban 21.9 (14.4, 32.2) 62 (4, 98) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 6.0)
Boyd County 7 Urban 21.5 (16.6, 27.6) 65 (11, 95) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.9)
Bracken County 7 Urban 32.3 (18.1, 53.6) 4 (1, 98) 3
*
*
Bullitt County 7 Urban 22.4 (18.5, 27.0) 59 (17, 89) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 3.4)
Butler County 7 Urban 21.7 (12.8, 35.0) 64 (3, 98) 4
*
*
Campbell County 7 Urban 25.5 (21.3, 30.3) 31 (7, 79) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.9)
Carter County 7 Urban 23.1 (16.1, 32.3) 50 (5, 97) 8
*
*
Christian County 7 Urban 18.4 (13.9, 23.9) 85 (24, 98) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 5.3)
Clark County 7 Urban 26.1 (19.6, 34.2) 26 (2, 92) 12 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.8)
Daviess County 7 Urban 29.7 (25.4, 34.6) 9 (3, 48) 36 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 5.1)
Edmonson County 7 Urban 25.8 (15.8, 40.6) 30 (2, 98) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.7, 2.3)
Fayette County 7 Urban 19.0 (16.9, 21.3) 83 (47, 92) 64 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Grant County 7 Urban 28.8 (20.4, 39.7) 12 (1, 92) 8
*
*
Greenup County 7 Urban 18.6 (13.4, 25.4) 84 (18, 98) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.3)
Hardin County 7 Urban 27.7 (23.6, 32.3) 20 (4, 63) 34 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.4)
Henry County 7 Urban 31.3 (20.4, 46.1) 6 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 7.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 21.9 (20.6, 23.4) 61 (36, 73) 209 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.2)
Jessamine County 7 Urban 20.9 (16.0, 26.9) 71 (12, 95) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.7)
Kenton County 7 Urban 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) 81 (40, 94) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.6)
Larue County 7 Urban 28.5 (18.0, 43.1) 16 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 6.3)
Lawrence County 7 Urban 21.3 (12.9, 33.3) 69 (3, 98) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 3.0)
Livingston County 7 Urban 22.2 (12.4, 38.3) 58 (2, 98) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.8)
McCracken County 7 Urban 21.1 (16.8, 26.1) 70 (19, 95) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
McLean County 7 Urban 54.0 (34.7, 80.2) 1 (1, 42) 6
*
*
Meade County 7 Urban 28.0 (20.6, 37.3) 22 (2, 88) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 6.2)
Nelson County 7 Urban 28.4 (22.2, 35.8) 17 (2, 78) 16 rising rising trend 17.0 (2.1, 29.8)
Oldham County 7 Urban 25.4 (20.6, 31.1) 33 (5, 85) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.8)
Pendleton County 7 Urban 27.2 (17.2, 41.3) 23 (1, 98) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 8.1)
Scott County 7 Urban 17.7 (13.2, 23.2) 90 (26, 98) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.8)
Shelby County 7 Urban 21.9 (16.7, 28.2) 63 (10, 95) 13 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.8, 7.9)
Spencer County 7 Urban 25.0 (17.0, 36.1) 36 (2, 96) 7
*
*
Trigg County 7 Urban 19.3 (11.3, 31.4) 80 (4, 98) 4
*
*
Warren County 7 Urban 17.8 (14.7, 21.3) 88 (44, 96) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.3, 0.9)
Woodford County 7 Urban 13.4 (8.7, 20.1) 96 (52, 98) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.7, 5.2)
Adair County 7 Rural 23.3 (15.7, 33.8) 48 (2, 97) 6
*
*
Anderson County 7 Rural 20.6 (14.1, 29.3) 73 (6, 98) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 15.3)
Barren County 7 Rural 25.5 (19.7, 32.5) 32 (4, 88) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.0)
Bath County 7 Rural 24.3 (14.0, 39.3) 40 (2, 98) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.1, 8.2)
Bell County 7 Rural 21.3 (14.8, 29.9) 68 (7, 98) 7
*
*
Boyle County 7 Rural 16.7 (11.2, 24.1) 93 (23, 98) 6
*
*
Breathitt County 7 Rural 24.0 (14.3, 38.2) 42 (1, 98) 4
*
*
Breckinridge County 7 Rural 26.7 (18.0, 38.3) 25 (2, 96) 7
*
*
Caldwell County 7 Rural 19.1 (11.3, 31.0) 82 (5, 98) 4
*
*
Calloway County 7 Rural 18.1 (13.1, 24.6) 86 (25, 98) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.9)
Casey County 7 Rural 23.6 (14.9, 35.8) 46 (2, 98) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.9)
Clay County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.0, 28.2) 87 (8, 98) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 7.8)
Clinton County 7 Rural 29.0 (16.9, 47.1) 10 (1, 98) 4
*
*
Estill County 7 Rural 31.6 (20.5, 47.1) 5 (1, 94) 6
*
*
Fleming County 7 Rural 28.6 (18.4, 42.7) 14 (1, 96) 5
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural 25.9 (19.6, 33.6) 29 (3, 88) 13 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.7)
Franklin County 7 Rural 23.8 (18.7, 30.0) 43 (8, 90) 16 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.3, 5.7)
Garrard County 7 Rural 25.9 (17.1, 38.0) 28 (2, 96) 6
*
*
Graves County 7 Rural 24.4 (18.2, 32.1) 39 (4, 93) 11
*
*
Grayson County 7 Rural 24.1 (16.9, 33.4) 41 (3, 96) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.4, 8.4)
Green County 7 Rural 28.5 (18.1, 43.6) 15 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.0, 3.4)
Hancock County 7 Rural 28.0 (15.4, 47.1) 19 (1, 98) 3
*
*
Harlan County 7 Rural 12.6 (7.9, 19.4) 98 (51, 98) 5 falling falling trend -11.3 (-27.7, -0.6)
Harrison County 7 Rural 26.0 (17.4, 37.6) 27 (2, 97) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.4)
Hart County 7 Rural 22.8 (14.9, 33.7) 52 (3, 98) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 5.0)
Henderson County 7 Rural 22.5 (17.2, 28.9) 57 (8, 95) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.9)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 22.7 (17.4, 29.3) 54 (8, 94) 13 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.7)
Johnson County 7 Rural 20.3 (13.7, 29.3) 75 (8, 98) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 5.5)
Knott County 7 Rural 16.4 (9.6, 27.1) 95 (13, 98) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.8)
Knox County 7 Rural 23.5 (17.1, 31.6) 47 (5, 95) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.6)
Laurel County 7 Rural 22.6 (17.9, 28.2) 56 (10, 92) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.6)
Letcher County 7 Rural 23.8 (16.4, 33.6) 44 (3, 97) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 6.3)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 23.4 (16.1, 33.0) 49 (3, 97) 7
*
*
Logan County 7 Rural 17.7 (12.1, 25.4) 89 (21, 98) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.2)
Madison County 7 Rural 19.5 (15.7, 23.9) 79 (27, 96) 20 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.9)
Magoffin County 7 Rural 28.9 (17.3, 45.7) 11 (1, 97) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.6, 7.4)
Marion County 7 Rural 17.0 (10.6, 26.3) 92 (14, 98) 5
*
*
Marshall County 7 Rural 19.7 (14.2, 26.9) 77 (13, 98) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7)
Mason County 7 Rural 25.0 (15.8, 37.7) 37 (2, 98) 5
*
*
McCreary County 7 Rural 23.5 (15.1, 35.4) 45 (2, 98) 5
*
*
Mercer County 7 Rural 25.2 (17.2, 35.7) 34 (2, 96) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.7)
Metcalfe County 7 Rural 32.8 (20.1, 51.1) 3 (1, 96) 4
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural 28.4 (16.1, 46.5) 18 (1, 98) 3
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural 27.0 (19.7, 36.3) 24 (2, 91) 9 rising rising trend 6.5 (3.9, 10.7)
Morgan County 7 Rural 23.0 (13.8, 36.5) 51 (2, 98) 4
*
*
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 21.9 (15.8, 29.8) 60 (7, 97) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.4, 8.5)
Ohio County 7 Rural 30.1 (21.6, 40.9) 8 (1, 91) 9 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.2, 8.5)
Owen County 7 Rural 30.7 (18.6, 48.0) 7 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Perry County 7 Rural 17.6 (11.7, 25.6) 91 (16, 98) 6
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural 28.7 (23.4, 34.8) 13 (3, 65) 23 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.4, 6.1)
Powell County 7 Rural 27.6 (16.9, 42.9) 21 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural 21.3 (17.0, 26.5) 67 (16, 93) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.8, 4.3)
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 22.8 (14.0, 35.3) 53 (2, 98) 5
*
*
Rowan County 7 Rural 13.1 (7.3, 21.7) 97 (31, 98) 3 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.6, 1.3)
Russell County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.6, 25.3) 94 (23, 98) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.6)
Simpson County 7 Rural 25.0 (16.8, 36.2) 35 (2, 97) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.0, 7.8)
Taylor County 7 Rural 19.5 (13.0, 28.2) 78 (8, 98) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.8)
Todd County 7 Rural 21.4 (11.9, 35.7) 66 (2, 98) 3
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 24.4 (14.3, 39.1) 38 (2, 98) 4
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural 20.2 (13.0, 30.2) 74 (5, 98) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 7.2)
Whitley County 7 Rural 20.8 (14.9, 28.2) 72 (8, 98) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 4.5)
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/31/2026 8:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top