Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 20.5 (20.0, 20.9) N/A 1,568 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Linn County 2 Rural 18.3 (10.0, 31.3) 63 (3, 84) 3 stable stable trend -3.7 (-29.2, 1.9)
Ralls County 2 Rural 20.5 (11.1, 35.5) 50 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Ripley County 2 Rural 20.8 (11.7, 35.1) 47 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural 25.1 (14.0, 42.0) 18 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Moniteau County 2 Urban 19.3 (11.1, 31.3) 58 (2, 84) 3
*
*
Bates County 2 Urban 16.5 (9.5, 27.1) 76 (7, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.4)
Douglas County 2 Rural 23.6 (13.2, 39.4) 28 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Hickory County 2 Rural 24.2 (12.8, 43.4) 25 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural 29.5 (16.6, 48.8) 6 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural 34.1 (18.9, 56.9) 1 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Chariton County 2 Rural 33.8 (19.2, 56.4) 2 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Dent County 2 Rural 19.6 (11.2, 32.1) 57 (2, 84) 4 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 8.0)
Madison County 2 Rural 22.3 (12.9, 36.4) 39 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -6.8 (-43.8, 7.9)
Wright County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.2, 28.0) 70 (5, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.6)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 24.8 (14.9, 39.2) 20 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -5.4 (-28.3, 1.2)
Dallas County 2 Urban 16.2 (9.7, 25.9) 77 (9, 84) 4
*
*
Livingston County 2 Rural 25.2 (15.2, 39.4) 16 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 28.4 (16.7, 45.5) 9 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.7, 7.7)
Morgan County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.7, 23.9) 83 (12, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.5)
Vernon County 2 Rural 15.6 (9.3, 24.6) 81 (10, 84) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-30.7, 2.5)
Clinton County 2 Urban 14.2 (8.9, 21.9) 84 (23, 84) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.1, 3.1)
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 25.4 (16.0, 38.6) 14 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Cedar County 2 Rural 22.3 (14.1, 34.2) 40 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Gasconade County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.0, 29.0) 60 (5, 84) 5
*
*
New Madrid County 2 Rural 22.2 (14.2, 33.5) 42 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 6.4)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 22.1 (14.2, 33.2) 43 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 7.0)
Macon County 2 Rural 24.0 (15.4, 36.1) 26 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.7, 5.5)
Pike County 2 Rural 24.7 (15.9, 36.7) 21 (1, 84) 5 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.6, 9.4)
Benton County 2 Rural 15.9 (9.7, 25.2) 79 (11, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.2)
Ray County 2 Urban 17.3 (11.2, 25.7) 73 (10, 84) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.3)
McDonald County 2 Rural 22.3 (14.9, 32.2) 41 (2, 84) 6
*
*
Cooper County 2 Urban 29.5 (19.8, 42.6) 7 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.3, 8.5)
Miller County 2 Rural 20.3 (13.5, 29.4) 51 (4, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.9, 4.7)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 24.5 (16.4, 35.6) 23 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Andrew County 2 Urban 29.2 (19.6, 41.9) 8 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Perry County 2 Rural 24.2 (16.4, 34.9) 24 (1, 83) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 5.7)
Texas County 2 Rural 17.9 (12.3, 25.7) 66 (11, 84) 7
*
*
Adair County 2 Rural 22.7 (15.8, 32.0) 35 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 9.4)
Saline County 2 Rural 22.9 (15.9, 32.3) 31 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 7.0)
Audrain County 2 Rural 21.1 (14.7, 29.8) 46 (4, 84) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-21.2, 4.6)
Crawford County 2 Rural 22.6 (15.6, 32.1) 37 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.5)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 16.7 (11.7, 23.2) 74 (15, 84) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.7)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.3, 22.6) 78 (19, 84) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 8.3)
Washington County 2 Rural 27.4 (19.3, 37.9) 11 (1, 80) 8
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural 26.7 (18.8, 37.2) 12 (1, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.3, 7.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 22.0 (15.7, 30.1) 44 (3, 83) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.7)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 18.9 (13.6, 25.8) 59 (11, 84) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 6.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 25.2 (18.0, 34.4) 17 (2, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.6, 7.9)
Barry County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.8, 24.7) 65 (11, 84) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.8, 10.6)
Phelps County 2 Rural 17.3 (12.5, 23.5) 72 (16, 84) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 30.8 (22.4, 41.3) 5 (1, 65) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.6, 7.4)
Webster County 2 Urban 19.7 (14.4, 26.4) 55 (9, 84) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.2)
Howell County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.7, 25.2) 61 (11, 84) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 4.4)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 27.6 (20.2, 36.9) 10 (1, 74) 10 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.2, 6.9)
Dunklin County 2 Rural 32.2 (23.9, 42.6) 4 (1, 60) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 7.8)
Johnson County 2 Rural 20.1 (14.9, 26.4) 52 (9, 83) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.6)
Warren County 2 Urban 24.5 (18.2, 32.4) 22 (2, 78) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 7.0)
Laclede County 2 Rural 25.4 (19.0, 33.3) 13 (1, 75) 11 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.2, 8.0)
Butler County 2 Rural 22.9 (17.1, 30.0) 33 (4, 81) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.6)
Pettis County 2 Rural 22.7 (17.1, 29.6) 36 (5, 80) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.6)
Stone County 2 Rural 23.8 (17.1, 32.4) 27 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.2)
Newton County 2 Urban 15.8 (12.0, 20.5) 80 (32, 84) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 7.6)
Taney County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.5, 21.5) 75 (25, 84) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.9)
Camden County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.5, 23.4) 67 (20, 84) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.1)
Callaway County 2 Urban 25.0 (19.3, 31.9) 19 (2, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.9)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 22.7 (17.7, 28.8) 34 (5, 77) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.7)
Christian County 2 Urban 15.1 (11.8, 19.0) 82 (42, 84) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.5)
Scott County 2 Rural 33.8 (26.6, 42.3) 3 (1, 38) 17 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.9, 11.0)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 17.6 (13.9, 22.0) 69 (24, 84) 17 stable stable trend -3.6 (-15.5, 0.0)
Cole County 2 Urban 17.7 (14.1, 22.1) 68 (25, 84) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.5)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 22.5 (18.1, 27.8) 38 (6, 76) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.7)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 20.8 (16.9, 25.3) 48 (11, 79) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.0)
Platte County 2 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 21.9) 64 (26, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.5)
Cass County 2 Urban 21.2 (17.8, 25.0) 45 (14, 75) 29 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.8)
Jasper County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.7, 27.4) 30 (8, 66) 32 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 5.0)
Franklin County 2 Urban 22.9 (19.5, 26.9) 32 (9, 67) 33 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
Boone County 2 Urban 20.6 (17.7, 23.9) 49 (17, 73) 37 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 3.8)
Greene County 2 Urban 17.4 (15.4, 19.5) 71 (42, 80) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 19.7 (17.5, 22.0) 56 (29, 73) 67 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Clay County 2 Urban 23.4 (21.0, 26.1) 29 (12, 54) 69 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 25.3 (22.7, 28.3) 15 (7, 45) 70 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.1, 4.7)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 19.7 (17.9, 21.6) 54 (32, 72) 97 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Jackson County 2 Urban 18.5 (17.2, 19.9) 62 (41, 74) 152 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 20.0 (18.9, 21.2) 53 (34, 64) 265 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
Atchison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 6:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top