Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 22.0 (21.4, 22.6) N/A 1,009 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Johnston County 2 Rural 26.4 (14.6, 44.2) 17 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural 22.5 (12.4, 38.4) 35 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Haskell County 2 Rural 22.6 (12.7, 37.6) 34 (1, 56) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 7.4)
Noble County 2 Rural 23.4 (13.1, 39.1) 28 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural 17.7 (10.2, 28.5) 54 (6, 56) 3
*
*
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 23.9 (13.6, 39.5) 24 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Atoka County 2 Rural 21.7 (13.0, 34.4) 43 (2, 56) 4
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural 19.9 (11.9, 31.8) 51 (3, 56) 4
*
*
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 24.2 (14.8, 37.6) 22 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.3, 6.6)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 22.2 (13.8, 34.4) 38 (2, 56) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.6, 6.6)
Hughes County 2 Rural 28.4 (18.0, 43.0) 10 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 5.1)
Beckham County 2 Rural 22.1 (14.5, 32.2) 39 (2, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 2.9)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 40.2 (26.3, 59.1) 1 (1, 48) 6
*
*
Woodward County 2 Rural 22.8 (15.0, 33.4) 32 (2, 56) 6
*
*
Craig County 2 Rural 33.7 (22.4, 49.0) 3 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.0, 6.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 21.8 (14.7, 31.3) 41 (3, 56) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 5.0)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 28.6 (19.3, 41.4) 9 (1, 55) 6 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.6, 8.3)
Adair County 2 Rural 31.0 (21.0, 44.2) 6 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-3.0, 9.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 22.3 (15.2, 31.5) 36 (4, 56) 7 stable stable trend 6.2 (-1.5, 34.3)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 24.9 (16.2, 36.7) 21 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 6.4)
Marshall County 2 Rural 33.9 (23.1, 48.4) 2 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.2, 11.8)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 20.8 (14.5, 28.9) 46 (6, 56) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.6, 8.3)
Garvin County 2 Rural 27.8 (19.6, 38.2) 13 (1, 55) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.7, 6.0)
Caddo County 2 Rural 28.0 (20.2, 38.0) 11 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.9, 6.9)
Seminole County 2 Rural 32.1 (23.1, 43.6) 5 (1, 48) 9 rising rising trend 13.9 (0.4, 47.5)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 27.3 (20.1, 36.2) 14 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.8)
Garfield County 2 Urban 15.2 (11.3, 20.0) 56 (35, 56) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.5)
Logan County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.2, 21.4) 55 (28, 56) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 3.6)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 26.6 (19.9, 34.9) 15 (2, 53) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.7)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 21.1 (15.7, 27.8) 45 (8, 56) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.8)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 20.3 (15.2, 26.7) 50 (11, 56) 12 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 5.9)
McClain County 2 Urban 23.5 (17.8, 30.5) 27 (4, 55) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.4, 6.6)
Osage County 2 Urban 18.0 (13.6, 23.6) 53 (18, 56) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.2)
Bryan County 2 Rural 23.6 (18.0, 30.6) 25 (4, 55) 12 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 5.2)
Delaware County 2 Rural 22.7 (17.0, 29.9) 33 (5, 56) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.7, 7.8)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 22.2 (16.9, 28.7) 37 (7, 55) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 6.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 29.3 (22.2, 38.0) 8 (1, 48) 13 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.7, 7.1)
Kay County 2 Rural 24.0 (18.2, 30.9) 23 (4, 55) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.9, 3.1)
Carter County 2 Rural 24.9 (19.2, 31.8) 20 (3, 53) 14 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 5.2)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 28.0 (21.7, 35.8) 12 (1, 50) 14 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 5.0)
Washington County 2 Rural 23.0 (17.8, 29.2) 30 (5, 54) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 6.1)
Stephens County 2 Rural 24.9 (19.4, 31.7) 19 (4, 53) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.7)
Grady County 2 Urban 21.8 (17.1, 27.5) 42 (10, 55) 16 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.2, 17.5)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 30.0 (23.5, 37.8) 7 (1, 45) 16 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 5.3)
Mayes County 2 Rural 33.1 (26.0, 41.6) 4 (1, 36) 16 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.6, 9.5)
Payne County 2 Rural 23.3 (18.5, 29.0) 29 (7, 54) 17 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.3, 14.2)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 22.9 (18.4, 28.3) 31 (8, 54) 19 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 5.8)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 20.4 (16.5, 25.0) 48 (16, 55) 20 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 6.1)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 26.4 (21.5, 32.0) 18 (4, 48) 22 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.7)
Creek County 2 Urban 26.6 (21.8, 32.1) 16 (3, 47) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 6.2)
Comanche County 2 Urban 21.7 (18.1, 25.8) 44 (14, 54) 27 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.8)
Rogers County 2 Urban 23.6 (19.8, 28.0) 26 (9, 51) 28 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.3)
Canadian County 2 Urban 20.7 (17.6, 24.1) 47 (18, 54) 34 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.9, 2.9)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 20.4 (18.1, 22.8) 49 (24, 53) 65 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.3)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 18.5 (17.2, 19.9) 52 (38, 55) 158 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.6, 2.3)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 21.9 (20.4, 23.5) 40 (23, 48) 162 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 0.5)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 9:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top