Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 2 N/A 18.0 (17.5, 18.5) N/A 1,194 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Lee County 2 Rural 17.0 (9.6, 28.2) 31 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Abbeville County 2 Rural 10.7 (6.4, 17.2) 42 (19, 43) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.8, 5.0)
Jasper County 2 Urban 9.4 (5.5, 15.2) 43 (28, 43) 4
*
*
Saluda County 2 Urban 13.9 (8.3, 22.4) 37 (4, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.1, 3.2)
Hampton County 2 Rural 17.1 (10.4, 26.9) 29 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Barnwell County 2 Rural 17.1 (10.4, 26.6) 30 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 27.8)
Edgefield County 2 Urban 12.4 (7.5, 19.5) 41 (9, 43) 4 stable stable trend -10.4 (-27.9, 2.6)
Bamberg County 2 Rural 23.9 (14.3, 38.0) 3 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.4, 6.9)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 14.4 (9.1, 22.2) 35 (4, 43) 5
*
*
Marlboro County 2 Rural 17.8 (11.7, 26.0) 25 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.9, 8.2)
Marion County 2 Rural 17.7 (12.0, 25.4) 26 (1, 43) 7 stable stable trend -23.6 (-53.3, 8.7)
Chester County 2 Urban 15.9 (11.1, 22.4) 34 (4, 43) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.7, 6.1)
Union County 2 Urban 19.6 (13.5, 27.8) 11 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 4.6)
Chesterfield County 2 Rural 13.2 (9.2, 18.4) 39 (10, 43) 8 falling falling trend -8.2 (-22.6, -2.1)
Williamsburg County 2 Rural 18.3 (12.8, 25.7) 22 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.6, 4.6)
Dillon County 2 Rural 23.3 (16.5, 32.1) 4 (1, 38) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.1)
Clarendon County 2 Rural 19.4 (13.9, 26.7) 13 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend -27.1 (-51.0, 0.8)
Newberry County 2 Rural 18.4 (13.5, 24.5) 21 (2, 41) 10 stable stable trend -16.4 (-30.5, 0.0)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 18.8 (14.2, 24.5) 19 (2, 40) 12 rising rising trend 16.6 (1.1, 30.8)
Colleton County 2 Rural 27.0 (20.4, 35.0) 1 (1, 28) 13 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 6.5)
Darlington County 2 Urban 17.2 (13.2, 22.2) 28 (4, 41) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.5)
Laurens County 2 Urban 19.5 (15.2, 24.6) 12 (2, 38) 16 falling falling trend -17.0 (-27.7, -5.2)
Kershaw County 2 Urban 22.7 (18.1, 28.1) 6 (1, 32) 19 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 7.0)
Georgetown County 2 Rural 20.6 (16.2, 25.8) 8 (1, 36) 21 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.6, 5.7)
Lancaster County 2 Urban 16.2 (13.2, 19.9) 32 (8, 41) 21 stable stable trend -2.2 (-15.4, 0.9)
Sumter County 2 Urban 16.2 (13.2, 19.8) 33 (9, 41) 21 stable stable trend -2.9 (-14.2, 2.0)
Orangeburg County 2 Rural 19.3 (15.6, 23.7) 14 (2, 37) 22 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 5.5)
Greenwood County 2 Rural 24.8 (20.4, 30.0) 2 (1, 22) 23 rising rising trend 5.4 (3.3, 8.1)
Oconee County 2 Rural 23.1 (19.0, 27.9) 5 (1, 28) 27 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.4, 5.6)
Pickens County 2 Urban 21.9 (18.5, 25.6) 7 (1, 29) 33 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.0)
Aiken County 2 Urban 13.8 (11.7, 16.2) 38 (26, 42) 33 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.7)
Florence County 2 Urban 20.2 (17.2, 23.6) 10 (2, 32) 35 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.8)
Dorchester County 2 Urban 20.2 (17.4, 23.4) 9 (2, 32) 38 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 4.5)
Beaufort County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.6, 14.7) 40 (31, 43) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Anderson County 2 Urban 18.6 (16.1, 21.2) 20 (6, 35) 47 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
York County 2 Urban 14.3 (12.5, 16.4) 36 (25, 41) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 18.3 (16.0, 20.9) 23 (6, 35) 48 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.2)
Lexington County 2 Urban 19.1 (17.1, 21.3) 17 (6, 32) 70 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.0)
Spartanburg County 2 Urban 19.2 (17.3, 21.3) 16 (6, 31) 77 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.9)
Richland County 2 Urban 17.4 (15.7, 19.3) 27 (11, 35) 77 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 3.0)
Charleston County 2 Urban 17.9 (16.3, 19.7) 24 (10, 34) 94 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.6)
Horry County 2 Urban 19.2 (17.4, 21.1) 15 (6, 31) 107 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.7)
Greenville County 2 Urban 18.9 (17.4, 20.5) 18 (7, 31) 122 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.2, 2.7)
Allendale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCormick County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top