Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 N/A 21.2 (20.5, 21.8) N/A 839 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.9, 2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Allamakee County 7 Rural 18.5 (11.4, 29.3) 58 (7, 75) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 3.0)
Appanoose County 7 Rural 38.3 (26.3, 54.6) 1 (1, 46) 7
*
*
Benton County 7 Urban 26.6 (19.2, 36.1) 16 (1, 69) 9 rising rising trend 21.0 (2.2, 34.8)
Black Hawk County 7 Urban 20.3 (17.1, 23.9) 48 (20, 68) 31 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.9, 3.9)
Boone County 7 Urban 27.1 (19.8, 36.4) 13 (1, 66) 10
*
*
Bremer County 7 Urban 20.6 (14.0, 29.5) 46 (5, 75) 7
*
*
Buchanan County 7 Rural 21.5 (14.1, 31.5) 38 (4, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.5)
Butler County 7 Rural 25.7 (16.2, 39.1) 20 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.2)
Carroll County 7 Rural 17.2 (10.9, 26.2) 65 (10, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.5)
Cass County 7 Rural 27.5 (17.0, 42.3) 12 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Cedar County 7 Rural 19.2 (12.1, 29.4) 56 (6, 75) 5
*
*
Cerro Gordo County 7 Rural 17.2 (12.7, 23.0) 66 (22, 75) 11 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.3)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 23.8 (13.5, 39.2) 27 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Chickasaw County 7 Rural 23.6 (14.2, 37.7) 28 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Clarke County 7 Rural 34.9 (21.0, 54.9) 3 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 16.5 (9.9, 26.4) 70 (11, 75) 4
*
*
Clayton County 7 Rural 21.1 (13.3, 32.3) 40 (4, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.7)
Clinton County 7 Rural 29.0 (23.0, 36.1) 8 (1, 48) 18 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.9, 5.5)
Crawford County 7 Rural 26.9 (17.6, 39.6) 15 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.8)
Dallas County 7 Urban 16.1 (12.8, 20.0) 71 (36, 75) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.9)
Decatur County 7 Rural 32.8 (18.2, 55.2) 5 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Delaware County 7 Rural 17.7 (10.6, 28.1) 64 (6, 75) 4
*
*
Des Moines County 7 Rural 17.1 (12.3, 23.2) 68 (21, 75) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.5)
Dickinson County 7 Rural 21.0 (13.2, 32.1) 43 (4, 75) 6
*
*
Dubuque County 7 Urban 20.2 (16.7, 24.2) 49 (20, 69) 26 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 3.1)
Fayette County 7 Rural 22.8 (15.1, 33.3) 32 (3, 75) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.5)
Floyd County 7 Rural 28.0 (18.4, 41.0) 11 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural 28.7 (16.8, 46.3) 9 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural 35.1 (20.8, 56.0) 2 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 Urban 18.0 (10.5, 29.6) 63 (7, 75) 4
*
*
Guthrie County 7 Urban 24.8 (14.1, 41.1) 23 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural 25.7 (16.1, 39.0) 21 (1, 75) 5 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.8, 6.2)
Hardin County 7 Rural 18.5 (11.4, 28.9) 57 (6, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 4.2)
Harrison County 7 Urban 22.4 (13.7, 34.9) 35 (2, 75) 5
*
*
Henry County 7 Rural 15.3 (9.2, 24.1) 73 (16, 75) 4
*
*
Humboldt County 7 Rural 24.7 (13.7, 41.8) 24 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Iowa County 7 Rural 19.8 (12.3, 30.5) 52 (4, 75) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.8)
Jackson County 7 Rural 23.1 (15.6, 33.4) 31 (2, 74) 7
*
*
Jasper County 7 Urban 20.0 (14.8, 26.6) 51 (11, 74) 10
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural 23.6 (14.8, 36.3) 29 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Johnson County 7 Urban 17.0 (14.1, 20.3) 69 (35, 74) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.6)
Jones County 7 Urban 18.0 (11.8, 26.8) 62 (10, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.8)
Keokuk County 7 Rural 28.3 (16.6, 45.7) 10 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Kossuth County 7 Rural 25.1 (16.2, 37.7) 22 (1, 75) 6 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.1, 5.0)
Lee County 7 Rural 28.9 (22.0, 37.5) 7 (1, 57) 13 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 5.2)
Linn County 7 Urban 21.5 (19.1, 24.2) 37 (19, 60) 58 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.9, 3.5)
Louisa County 7 Rural 20.9 (11.5, 35.5) 42 (2, 75) 3
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural 20.8 (11.9, 34.4) 45 (2, 75) 3
*
*
Madison County 7 Urban 19.7 (12.2, 30.7) 53 (4, 75) 4
*
*
Mahaska County 7 Rural 14.2 (8.5, 22.6) 75 (21, 75) 4
*
*
Marion County 7 Rural 25.9 (19.2, 34.3) 19 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3)
Marshall County 7 Rural 24.5 (18.4, 32.0) 25 (3, 68) 12 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.4, 4.5)
Mills County 7 Urban 19.3 (11.6, 30.8) 55 (4, 75) 4
*
*
Monona County 7 Rural 31.4 (18.3, 51.2) 6 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural 33.3 (19.6, 53.0) 4 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Muscatine County 7 Rural 25.9 (20.0, 33.2) 18 (3, 61) 14 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 4.2)
O'Brien County 7 Rural 21.0 (12.4, 33.5) 44 (3, 75) 4
*
*
Page County 7 Rural 18.2 (11.0, 29.1) 59 (6, 75) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.6)
Plymouth County 7 Rural 27.1 (19.6, 36.6) 14 (1, 71) 9
*
*
Polk County 7 Urban 21.5 (19.7, 23.4) 39 (23, 55) 113 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.5, 2.7)
Pottawattamie County 7 Urban 24.3 (20.4, 28.8) 26 (7, 57) 30 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.0, 4.5)
Poweshiek County 7 Rural 18.2 (11.0, 28.7) 61 (7, 75) 4
*
*
Scott County 7 Urban 21.1 (18.4, 24.2) 41 (19, 62) 45 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.9)
Shelby County 7 Rural 22.8 (12.9, 37.7) 34 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Sioux County 7 Rural 15.1 (10.3, 21.4) 74 (27, 75) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.5)
Story County 7 Urban 15.4 (11.9, 19.6) 72 (37, 75) 14 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.6)
Tama County 7 Rural 19.4 (11.7, 30.6) 54 (5, 75) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 4.5)
Union County 7 Rural 26.7 (16.0, 42.1) 17 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Wapello County 7 Rural 20.0 (14.4, 27.3) 50 (10, 75) 9 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.2, 5.0)
Warren County 7 Urban 18.3 (13.7, 24.0) 60 (18, 75) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 4.1)
Washington County 7 Urban 20.6 (13.5, 30.1) 47 (5, 75) 6
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural 17.1 (12.0, 23.8) 67 (18, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 4.0)
Winneshiek County 7 Rural 22.7 (15.0, 33.2) 33 (3, 75) 7
*
*
Woodbury County 7 Urban 23.4 (19.5, 27.7) 30 (9, 61) 27 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.1, 3.6)
Wright County 7 Rural 21.8 (12.6, 35.6) 36 (2, 75) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Alto County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sac County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winnebago County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 3:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top