Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 19.9 (19.4, 20.3) N/A 1,688 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Chester County 2 Urban 18.2 (11.2, 28.5) 71 (3, 85) 4 falling falling trend -25.9 (-49.0, -4.3)
Campbell County 2 Urban 18.6 (13.8, 24.7) 69 (11, 85) 11 falling falling trend -5.5 (-14.4, -0.3)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 19.2 (17.0, 21.5) 62 (26, 77) 61 stable stable trend -5.4 (-13.4, 2.2)
Coffee County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.5, 21.4) 79 (20, 85) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-13.2, -0.1)
Henry County 2 Rural 13.5 (9.4, 19.2) 84 (36, 85) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Franklin County 2 Rural 11.9 (8.2, 16.9) 85 (53, 85) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.8)
Hardin County 2 Rural 19.1 (13.4, 26.8) 63 (4, 85) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.2, 3.8)
Bradley County 2 Urban 19.3 (16.0, 23.1) 60 (17, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-12.7, 3.3)
Carroll County 2 Rural 26.5 (19.1, 36.0) 10 (1, 79) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.4)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 21.1 (14.0, 31.1) 36 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 4.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 17.2 (10.9, 26.1) 75 (6, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.7)
Davidson County 2 Urban 15.7 (14.4, 17.1) 80 (62, 83) 116 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Dyer County 2 Rural 23.0 (17.2, 30.2) 27 (2, 83) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-16.2, 5.3)
Sumner County 2 Urban 20.8 (18.3, 23.7) 40 (15, 73) 50 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.5)
Grainger County 2 Urban 21.0 (14.3, 30.2) 37 (2, 85) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.9)
Knox County 2 Urban 18.2 (16.6, 19.9) 72 (39, 78) 102 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.4, 27.6) 24 (5, 69) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Sevier County 2 Rural 20.8 (17.3, 24.9) 41 (9, 79) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.8)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 18.8 (11.5, 30.1) 66 (3, 85) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.8, 7.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 19.1 (16.4, 22.3) 64 (20, 80) 38 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.1)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 14.1 (9.5, 20.5) 83 (24, 85) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.8, 5.6)
Giles County 2 Rural 18.4 (12.4, 26.4) 70 (5, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.4)
Anderson County 2 Urban 20.4 (16.5, 25.0) 48 (9, 81) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 19.3 (14.0, 26.0) 61 (5, 85) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.9)
Overton County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.9, 23.5) 81 (12, 85) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.5)
Loudon County 2 Urban 16.7 (13.1, 21.4) 77 (23, 85) 16 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 5.4)
Williamson County 2 Urban 17.2 (15.1, 19.6) 74 (40, 83) 49 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.6)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 31.5 (23.2, 41.9) 1 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 5.0)
Haywood County 2 Rural 25.7 (17.0, 37.6) 14 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.2)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 19.8 (11.8, 31.3) 56 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.6, 5.9)
Fayette County 2 Urban 23.3 (18.1, 29.8) 23 (2, 79) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.4)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 20.7 (16.4, 25.8) 44 (8, 81) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 5.0)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 25.8 (20.0, 33.0) 13 (1, 71) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.2)
Wilson County 2 Urban 19.7 (16.9, 23.0) 58 (18, 79) 36 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.4)
Henderson County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.1, 28.3) 51 (4, 85) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.7)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 20.6 (17.7, 23.7) 46 (14, 77) 40 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.6)
Robertson County 2 Urban 20.1 (16.0, 25.1) 52 (9, 83) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.7)
Shelby County 2 Urban 20.6 (19.4, 22.0) 45 (26, 63) 210 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.3)
Union County 2 Urban 20.7 (13.2, 31.3) 43 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.1, 6.5)
Washington County 2 Urban 17.5 (14.7, 20.8) 73 (28, 83) 29 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.9)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 21.3 (19.4, 23.4) 34 (16, 63) 99 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 21.0 (16.0, 27.2) 38 (4, 82) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.1, 6.1)
Putnam County 2 Rural 19.0 (15.2, 23.6) 65 (14, 83) 18 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.7, 5.6)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 23.3 (18.7, 28.7) 25 (3, 76) 19 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.8)
White County 2 Rural 19.8 (13.9, 27.5) 57 (4, 85) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.1, 7.8)
Fentress County 2 Rural 20.7 (13.5, 30.9) 42 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 7.1)
Marshall County 2 Rural 21.3 (15.4, 29.0) 33 (3, 84) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 7.3)
Tipton County 2 Urban 24.7 (19.7, 30.5) 17 (2, 73) 18 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 6.9)
Bedford County 2 Rural 20.3 (15.5, 26.3) 50 (5, 83) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.3)
Gibson County 2 Urban 20.0 (15.3, 25.8) 55 (7, 83) 13 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 5.0)
Cocke County 2 Rural 22.7 (17.2, 29.7) 28 (2, 81) 13 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 6.8)
Maury County 2 Urban 23.4 (19.6, 27.7) 22 (5, 68) 29 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.0, 4.9)
Rhea County 2 Rural 28.2 (21.3, 36.9) 6 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 7.1)
Warren County 2 Rural 23.7 (17.9, 30.8) 19 (2, 79) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 8.2)
Dickson County 2 Urban 25.0 (19.8, 31.3) 15 (1, 72) 17 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.1, 7.2)
Weakley County 2 Rural 18.6 (12.8, 26.3) 67 (7, 85) 8 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.2)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 22.4 (19.6, 25.6) 29 (9, 65) 51 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.6, 5.6)
Carter County 2 Urban 16.7 (12.8, 21.6) 78 (21, 85) 14 stable stable trend 3.6 (0.0, 8.1)
Obion County 2 Rural 21.2 (15.4, 28.6) 35 (2, 84) 10 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 8.1)
Crockett County 2 Urban 26.3 (16.2, 40.5) 11 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.4, 9.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 20.0 (16.2, 24.7) 54 (10, 82) 21 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.7, 7.5)
Marion County 2 Urban 20.4 (14.1, 28.7) 47 (3, 85) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.3, 9.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 22.1 (16.2, 29.6) 30 (2, 84) 10 stable stable trend 4.6 (0.0, 10.7)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 20.3 (15.8, 25.9) 49 (7, 83) 16 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.9, 6.9)
McNairy County 2 Rural 26.0 (18.4, 35.8) 12 (1, 82) 9 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.5, 8.7)
Smith County 2 Urban 29.9 (20.9, 41.7) 4 (1, 80) 8 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.8, 9.9)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 23.4 (16.1, 33.0) 21 (1, 84) 7 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.4, 10.6)
Decatur County 2 Rural 28.9 (18.4, 44.3) 5 (1, 84) 5 rising rising trend 7.0 (2.4, 14.1)
Roane County 2 Urban 19.3 (15.1, 24.6) 59 (9, 84) 16 rising rising trend 9.1 (1.0, 25.1)
McMinn County 2 Rural 27.3 (21.8, 33.8) 8 (1, 57) 19 rising rising trend 11.3 (2.2, 33.1)
Benton County 2 Rural 16.8 (10.1, 27.0) 76 (5, 85) 4
*
*
Cannon County 2 Urban 25.0 (16.0, 37.7) 16 (1, 84) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural 14.2 (8.8, 22.3) 82 (18, 85) 4
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural 21.5 (13.1, 34.0) 32 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Hickman County 2 Urban 27.9 (19.8, 38.3) 7 (1, 78) 8
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Urban 18.6 (14.2, 24.0) 68 (12, 85) 14
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural 24.0 (14.0, 38.7) 18 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban 30.2 (21.7, 41.0) 3 (1, 68) 9
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 20.9 (11.3, 35.6) 39 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban 20.1 (12.6, 30.7) 53 (2, 85) 5
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 22.0 (14.3, 32.4) 31 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 23.6 (15.1, 35.6) 20 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Stewart County 2 Urban 26.6 (16.2, 41.5) 9 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban 31.3 (17.8, 51.0) 2 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.0, 35.0) 26 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top