Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 20.5 (20.0, 20.9) N/A 1,568 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Adair County 2 Rural 22.7 (15.8, 32.0) 35 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.9, 9.4)
Audrain County 2 Rural 21.1 (14.7, 29.8) 46 (4, 84) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-21.2, 4.6)
Barry County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.8, 24.7) 65 (11, 84) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.8, 10.6)
Benton County 2 Rural 15.9 (9.7, 25.2) 79 (11, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.2)
Butler County 2 Rural 22.9 (17.1, 30.0) 33 (4, 81) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.6)
Camden County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.5, 23.4) 67 (20, 84) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.1)
Cedar County 2 Rural 22.3 (14.1, 34.2) 40 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Chariton County 2 Rural 33.8 (19.2, 56.4) 2 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural 22.6 (15.6, 32.1) 37 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.5)
Dent County 2 Rural 19.6 (11.2, 32.1) 57 (2, 84) 4 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 8.0)
Douglas County 2 Rural 23.6 (13.2, 39.4) 28 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Dunklin County 2 Rural 32.2 (23.9, 42.6) 4 (1, 60) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 7.8)
Gasconade County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.0, 29.0) 60 (5, 84) 5
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural 25.1 (14.0, 42.0) 18 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural 26.7 (18.8, 37.2) 12 (1, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.3, 7.0)
Hickory County 2 Rural 24.2 (12.8, 43.4) 25 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Howell County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.7, 25.2) 61 (11, 84) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.5, 4.4)
Johnson County 2 Rural 20.1 (14.9, 26.4) 52 (9, 83) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.6)
Laclede County 2 Rural 25.4 (19.0, 33.3) 13 (1, 75) 11 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.2, 8.0)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.3, 22.6) 78 (19, 84) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 8.3)
Lewis County 2 Rural 29.5 (16.6, 48.8) 6 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Linn County 2 Rural 18.3 (10.0, 31.3) 63 (3, 84) 3 stable stable trend -3.7 (-29.2, 1.9)
Livingston County 2 Rural 25.2 (15.2, 39.4) 16 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural 24.0 (15.4, 36.1) 26 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.7, 5.5)
Madison County 2 Rural 22.3 (12.9, 36.4) 39 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -6.8 (-43.8, 7.9)
Marion County 2 Rural 25.2 (18.0, 34.4) 17 (2, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.6, 7.9)
McDonald County 2 Rural 22.3 (14.9, 32.2) 41 (2, 84) 6
*
*
Miller County 2 Rural 20.3 (13.5, 29.4) 51 (4, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.9, 4.7)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 24.8 (14.9, 39.2) 20 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -5.4 (-28.3, 1.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 34.1 (18.9, 56.9) 1 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 28.4 (16.7, 45.5) 9 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.7, 7.7)
Morgan County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.7, 23.9) 83 (12, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.5)
New Madrid County 2 Rural 22.2 (14.2, 33.5) 42 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 6.4)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 22.1 (14.2, 33.2) 43 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 7.0)
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 25.4 (16.0, 38.6) 14 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural 24.2 (16.4, 34.9) 24 (1, 83) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 5.7)
Pettis County 2 Rural 22.7 (17.1, 29.6) 36 (5, 80) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.6)
Phelps County 2 Rural 17.3 (12.5, 23.5) 72 (16, 84) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.3)
Pike County 2 Rural 24.7 (15.9, 36.7) 21 (1, 84) 5 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.6, 9.4)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 16.7 (11.7, 23.2) 74 (15, 84) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.7)
Ralls County 2 Rural 20.5 (11.1, 35.5) 50 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural 30.8 (22.4, 41.3) 5 (1, 65) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.6, 7.4)
Ripley County 2 Rural 20.8 (11.7, 35.1) 47 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Saline County 2 Rural 22.9 (15.9, 32.3) 31 (2, 83) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 7.0)
Scott County 2 Rural 33.8 (26.6, 42.3) 3 (1, 38) 17 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.9, 11.0)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 22.5 (18.1, 27.8) 38 (6, 76) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.7)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 24.5 (16.4, 35.6) 23 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Stoddard County 2 Rural 27.6 (20.2, 36.9) 10 (1, 74) 10 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.2, 6.9)
Stone County 2 Rural 23.8 (17.1, 32.4) 27 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.2)
Taney County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.5, 21.5) 75 (25, 84) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.9)
Texas County 2 Rural 17.9 (12.3, 25.7) 66 (11, 84) 7
*
*
Vernon County 2 Rural 15.6 (9.3, 24.6) 81 (10, 84) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-30.7, 2.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 27.4 (19.3, 37.9) 11 (1, 80) 8
*
*
Wright County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.2, 28.0) 70 (5, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.6)
Andrew County 2 Urban 29.2 (19.6, 41.9) 8 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Bates County 2 Urban 16.5 (9.5, 27.1) 76 (7, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.4)
Boone County 2 Urban 20.6 (17.7, 23.9) 49 (17, 73) 37 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 3.8)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 20.8 (16.9, 25.3) 48 (11, 79) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.0)
Callaway County 2 Urban 25.0 (19.3, 31.9) 19 (2, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.9)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 17.6 (13.9, 22.0) 69 (24, 84) 17 stable stable trend -3.6 (-15.5, 0.0)
Cass County 2 Urban 21.2 (17.8, 25.0) 45 (14, 75) 29 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.8)
Christian County 2 Urban 15.1 (11.8, 19.0) 82 (42, 84) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.5)
Clay County 2 Urban 23.4 (21.0, 26.1) 29 (12, 54) 69 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Clinton County 2 Urban 14.2 (8.9, 21.9) 84 (23, 84) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.1, 3.1)
Cole County 2 Urban 17.7 (14.1, 22.1) 68 (25, 84) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.5)
Cooper County 2 Urban 29.5 (19.8, 42.6) 7 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.3, 8.5)
Dallas County 2 Urban 16.2 (9.7, 25.9) 77 (9, 84) 4
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 22.9 (19.5, 26.9) 32 (9, 67) 33 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 17.4 (15.4, 19.5) 71 (42, 80) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Jackson County 2 Urban 18.5 (17.2, 19.9) 62 (41, 74) 152 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Jasper County 2 Urban 23.3 (19.7, 27.4) 30 (8, 66) 32 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 5.0)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 25.3 (22.7, 28.3) 15 (7, 45) 70 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.1, 4.7)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 18.9 (13.6, 25.8) 59 (11, 84) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 6.4)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 22.7 (17.7, 28.8) 34 (5, 77) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.7)
Moniteau County 2 Urban 19.3 (11.1, 31.3) 58 (2, 84) 3
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban 15.8 (12.0, 20.5) 80 (32, 84) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 7.6)
Platte County 2 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 21.9) 64 (26, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 22.0 (15.7, 30.1) 44 (3, 83) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.7)
Ray County 2 Urban 17.3 (11.2, 25.7) 73 (10, 84) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.3)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 19.7 (17.9, 21.6) 54 (32, 72) 97 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 19.7 (17.5, 22.0) 56 (29, 73) 67 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 20.0 (18.9, 21.2) 53 (34, 64) 265 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
Warren County 2 Urban 24.5 (18.2, 32.4) 22 (2, 78) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 7.0)
Webster County 2 Urban 19.7 (14.4, 26.4) 55 (9, 84) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.2)
Atchison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 12:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top