Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 21.2 (20.9, 21.4) N/A 6,433 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Comanche County 7 Rural 16.3 (8.8, 28.1) 160 (16, 166) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.5)
Ward County 7 Rural 27.6 (15.6, 45.2) 39 (1, 166) 3
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural 23.9 (13.6, 41.2) 94 (2, 166) 3 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.7, 10.9)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 26.0 (14.2, 44.6) 61 (1, 166) 3
*
*
Andrews County 7 Rural 23.2 (13.5, 36.9) 105 (2, 166) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.9)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 18.8 (11.0, 30.0) 144 (13, 166) 4
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural 31.1 (18.1, 50.1) 25 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Marion County 7 Rural 19.0 (11.0, 32.6) 143 (13, 166) 4
*
*
Rains County 7 Rural 18.5 (10.4, 31.4) 149 (10, 166) 4
*
*
Refugio County 7 Rural 32.6 (19.2, 53.9) 16 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Blanco County 7 Rural 18.0 (10.3, 30.7) 153 (10, 166) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 5.3)
Runnels County 7 Rural 28.4 (16.4, 46.1) 34 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Clay County 7 Urban 26.9 (15.3, 44.5) 49 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Morris County 7 Rural 23.0 (13.5, 37.1) 112 (4, 166) 4
*
*
Terry County 7 Rural 31.7 (19.1, 49.5) 21 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Goliad County 7 Urban 34.2 (20.7, 55.3) 10 (1, 165) 4
*
*
Karnes County 7 Rural 26.9 (16.5, 41.5) 51 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Moore County 7 Rural 21.7 (13.3, 33.4) 126 (7, 166) 4
*
*
Newton County 7 Rural 24.5 (14.5, 39.4) 82 (1, 166) 4
*
*
Reeves County 7 Rural 33.2 (20.5, 50.8) 13 (1, 165) 4 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.3, 7.3)
Shelby County 7 Rural 13.6 (8.3, 21.1) 166 (75, 166) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.5)
Hockley County 7 Urban 19.8 (12.2, 30.5) 136 (8, 166) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.0, 2.4)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 32.6 (19.9, 50.7) 15 (1, 165) 4
*
*
Gray County 7 Rural 18.3 (11.5, 27.9) 150 (21, 166) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.5)
Willacy County 7 Rural 23.0 (14.4, 34.7) 107 (5, 166) 5
*
*
Zavala County 7 Rural 47.7 (29.9, 72.0) 1 (1, 142) 5
*
*
Camp County 7 Rural 33.5 (20.8, 51.1) 11 (1, 164) 5 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.4, 10.5)
Franklin County 7 Rural 32.9 (20.3, 50.9) 14 (1, 165) 5
*
*
McCulloch County 7 Rural 41.2 (25.1, 64.6) 2 (1, 163) 5
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural 27.1 (17.0, 41.0) 47 (1, 166) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 5.0)
Sabine County 7 Rural 28.5 (16.8, 46.4) 33 (1, 166) 5
*
*
Dawson County 7 Rural 37.5 (24.3, 55.4) 6 (1, 160) 5
*
*
Eastland County 7 Rural 17.0 (11.1, 25.7) 157 (43, 166) 5
*
*
Red River County 7 Rural 26.1 (16.8, 39.9) 60 (1, 165) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.3)
Trinity County 7 Rural 22.3 (13.6, 35.2) 117 (4, 166) 5
*
*
Young County 7 Rural 22.2 (13.9, 33.8) 121 (5, 166) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.8, 7.5)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 23.1 (15.0, 34.2) 106 (7, 166) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.8, 4.4)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 38.3 (24.7, 56.6) 4 (1, 159) 5
*
*
Nolan County 7 Rural 31.4 (20.6, 46.0) 23 (1, 162) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.3, 10.1)
Frio County 7 Rural 35.9 (23.9, 51.8) 9 (1, 157) 6
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural 24.5 (16.1, 35.7) 85 (4, 166) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.7)
Callahan County 7 Urban 30.3 (19.9, 44.7) 27 (1, 164) 6
*
*
Burleson County 7 Urban 25.4 (16.7, 37.3) 68 (2, 166) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 4.1)
Falls County 7 Urban 26.6 (17.9, 38.4) 52 (2, 165) 6 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 7.7)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 19.5 (13.0, 28.5) 137 (16, 166) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 6.0)
Lee County 7 Rural 26.1 (17.5, 37.9) 59 (3, 165) 6
*
*
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 25.3 (17.1, 36.3) 71 (4, 166) 7 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 6.7)
Fayette County 7 Rural 16.0 (10.7, 23.5) 163 (47, 166) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.7)
Freestone County 7 Rural 25.9 (17.7, 36.9) 63 (3, 165) 7 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.6, 6.4)
Jones County 7 Urban 29.4 (20.3, 41.5) 29 (2, 162) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 3.9)
Robertson County 7 Urban 27.5 (18.8, 39.2) 40 (2, 164) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 7.6)
Titus County 7 Rural 19.9 (13.6, 28.1) 134 (20, 166) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 4.1)
Bandera County 7 Urban 19.2 (12.7, 28.5) 139 (19, 166) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.8)
Leon County 7 Rural 32.5 (21.8, 47.0) 17 (1, 159) 7 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.6, 11.4)
Montague County 7 Rural 23.4 (16.0, 33.3) 99 (4, 166) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.7, 7.4)
Tyler County 7 Rural 25.4 (17.2, 36.4) 69 (4, 166) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 7.1)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 24.8 (17.2, 34.9) 78 (6, 165) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.1)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 25.1 (17.1, 35.7) 76 (4, 166) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.9)
Scurry County 7 Rural 38.4 (26.7, 53.4) 5 (1, 141) 7
*
*
Bosque County 7 Urban 23.3 (16.1, 33.2) 103 (8, 165) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.6)
Limestone County 7 Rural 27.7 (19.0, 39.1) 38 (2, 164) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 8.5)
Austin County 7 Urban 18.0 (12.6, 25.3) 152 (29, 166) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 5.0)
Bee County 7 Rural 25.4 (18.0, 34.7) 70 (4, 163) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.7)
Panola County 7 Rural 26.9 (19.0, 37.2) 50 (3, 163) 8 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 5.0)
Colorado County 7 Rural 30.5 (21.4, 42.4) 26 (1, 154) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.9, 7.8)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 22.6 (16.0, 31.3) 114 (11, 165) 9 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.2, 11.1)
Houston County 7 Rural 26.9 (19.3, 36.9) 48 (3, 161) 9 falling falling trend -16.4 (-25.3, -6.7)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 23.3 (16.4, 32.4) 100 (9, 166) 9 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 10.0)
Aransas County 7 Urban 21.2 (14.8, 30.0) 128 (15, 166) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.8)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 32.0 (23.2, 43.0) 19 (1, 152) 9 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.8, 6.2)
Waller County 7 Urban 16.2 (11.7, 21.9) 161 (75, 166) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 6.9)
Grimes County 7 Rural 26.2 (19.0, 35.2) 62 (5, 163) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 7.6)
Hale County 7 Rural 29.5 (21.7, 39.2) 28 (2, 152) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.1, 6.2)
Howard County 7 Rural 26.2 (19.2, 34.9) 57 (5, 161) 10 stable stable trend 3.2 (0.0, 7.6)
Rusk County 7 Urban 16.1 (11.9, 21.5) 162 (82, 166) 10 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 6.5)
Erath County 7 Rural 21.7 (16.1, 28.8) 124 (21, 165) 10 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.3, 6.5)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 23.1 (16.2, 32.2) 109 (5, 165) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 5.2)
Llano County 7 Rural 27.3 (18.9, 38.7) 46 (2, 163) 11 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 24.6 (18.2, 32.9) 81 (8, 163) 11 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 6.1)
Milam County 7 Rural 31.8 (23.6, 42.2) 20 (1, 144) 11 rising rising trend 8.3 (3.5, 26.4)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 40.1 (29.9, 52.7) 3 (1, 99) 11 rising rising trend 24.6 (4.2, 43.3)
Hill County 7 Rural 23.3 (17.3, 30.8) 102 (14, 163) 11 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.1, 6.6)
Navarro County 7 Rural 18.5 (13.9, 24.2) 148 (41, 166) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 4.3)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 24.5 (18.4, 32.1) 83 (10, 163) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 7.4)
Kendall County 7 Urban 19.0 (14.3, 25.0) 142 (39, 166) 12
*
*
Anderson County 7 Rural 18.8 (14.3, 24.3) 147 (46, 166) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 3.0)
Fannin County 7 Rural 25.7 (19.5, 33.3) 65 (8, 159) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.2, 7.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 22.7 (17.2, 29.7) 113 (17, 163) 12 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.8, 5.7)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 18.8 (14.3, 24.3) 145 (46, 166) 12 rising rising trend 8.2 (1.3, 27.2)
Chambers County 7 Urban 26.3 (20.1, 33.8) 55 (7, 159) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.5)
Cooke County 7 Rural 23.6 (17.9, 30.6) 98 (12, 162) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 7.4)
Kerr County 7 Rural 14.3 (10.7, 19.0) 165 (113, 166) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 3.0)
Starr County 7 Rural 22.4 (17.2, 28.6) 118 (21, 163) 13 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.6, 9.1)
Jasper County 7 Rural 26.3 (20.2, 34.0) 53 (6, 159) 13 stable stable trend -10.9 (-24.4, 2.0)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 24.9 (19.2, 31.9) 75 (11, 159) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.7)
Maverick County 7 Urban 24.3 (18.8, 30.9) 89 (10, 161) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 6.6)
Brown County 7 Rural 27.6 (21.2, 35.5) 43 (5, 153) 14 rising rising trend 28.3 (4.9, 50.1)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 31.3 (24.1, 40.0) 24 (1, 139) 14 rising rising trend 6.5 (4.5, 9.5)
Wharton County 7 Rural 27.7 (21.6, 35.2) 37 (5, 152) 15 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.0, 5.3)
Upshur County 7 Urban 28.5 (22.2, 36.2) 32 (4, 145) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.3)
Lamar County 7 Rural 24.4 (19.0, 30.9) 86 (11, 161) 15 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.4)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 32.3 (25.5, 40.4) 18 (2, 123) 16 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 7.0)
Coryell County 7 Urban 21.8 (17.2, 27.2) 123 (24, 163) 16 stable stable trend -16.8 (-31.1, 0.2)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 36.2 (28.5, 45.4) 8 (1, 88) 16 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.0, 7.4)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 24.7 (19.4, 31.1) 80 (12, 158) 16 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 4.1)
Walker County 7 Rural 19.2 (15.2, 24.0) 141 (50, 166) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.9)
Medina County 7 Urban 26.3 (20.8, 32.9) 54 (10, 151) 17 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 6.4)
Wilson County 7 Urban 27.6 (21.9, 34.5) 41 (6, 144) 17 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 4.0)
Wise County 7 Urban 20.3 (16.1, 25.3) 130 (38, 165) 17 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 8.2)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 31.4 (25.1, 39.0) 22 (2, 124) 18 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.5)
Wood County 7 Rural 25.5 (19.8, 32.6) 66 (9, 156) 18 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 5.1)
Burnet County 7 Rural 27.5 (21.8, 34.4) 44 (5, 147) 19 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 5.1)
Hardin County 7 Urban 27.6 (22.2, 34.0) 42 (8, 139) 19 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.8)
Harrison County 7 Urban 23.9 (19.3, 29.4) 93 (20, 155) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.7)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 24.3 (19.6, 29.9) 88 (18, 155) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.4, 5.1)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 28.9 (23.5, 35.1) 30 (6, 127) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 5.3)
Polk County 7 Rural 33.4 (26.8, 41.3) 12 (1, 100) 22 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.5)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 20.0 (16.4, 24.2) 132 (51, 164) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 4.5)
Hood County 7 Rural 26.2 (21.3, 31.9) 58 (10, 145) 24 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.6)
Bowie County 7 Urban 22.4 (18.5, 26.9) 116 (34, 158) 25 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Orange County 7 Urban 24.0 (19.8, 28.7) 92 (20, 152) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.9, 1.7)
Hunt County 7 Urban 23.1 (19.2, 27.6) 108 (27, 154) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.5)
Liberty County 7 Urban 28.2 (23.4, 33.6) 35 (7, 128) 26 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 6.4)
Midland County 7 Urban 17.6 (14.7, 20.9) 155 (98, 165) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.8)
Angelina County 7 Rural 27.4 (22.9, 32.5) 45 (11, 133) 28 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.6)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 24.2 (20.2, 28.7) 90 (24, 150) 28 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 4.2)
Potter County 7 Urban 23.7 (19.9, 27.9) 97 (28, 151) 29 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.9, 6.2)
Henderson County 7 Rural 23.9 (20.0, 28.4) 95 (22, 151) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.5)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 21.7 (18.3, 25.5) 125 (36, 158) 31 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 3.2)
Victoria County 7 Urban 28.7 (24.3, 33.8) 31 (9, 121) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.9, 2.7)
Randall County 7 Urban 20.4 (17.3, 23.9) 131 (60, 160) 33 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.3)
Ector County 7 Urban 23.3 (19.8, 27.2) 101 (29, 150) 34 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.9)
Wichita County 7 Urban 24.1 (20.6, 28.1) 91 (27, 145) 35 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Brazos County 7 Urban 19.8 (17.0, 23.1) 135 (71, 160) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.5)
Taylor County 7 Urban 24.4 (20.8, 28.4) 87 (26, 142) 35 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 4.2)
Gregg County 7 Urban 25.6 (21.9, 29.7) 67 (20, 134) 36 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.6)
Comal County 7 Urban 16.5 (14.1, 19.2) 159 (119, 166) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 1.0)
Grayson County 7 Urban 23.0 (19.8, 26.6) 111 (33, 150) 39 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 3.0)
Parker County 7 Urban 24.7 (21.5, 28.3) 79 (28, 133) 46 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.3, 3.6)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 23.3 (20.3, 26.6) 104 (35, 145) 46 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.2)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 36.8 (32.2, 41.9) 7 (1, 36) 49 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.5, 6.1)
Johnson County 7 Urban 25.4 (22.3, 28.9) 73 (23, 129) 50 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.6, 15.2)
Hays County 7 Urban 22.2 (19.5, 25.2) 120 (48, 147) 52 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.9)
Ellis County 7 Urban 26.2 (23.0, 29.7) 56 (21, 123) 53 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 3.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 19.9 (17.6, 22.4) 133 (85, 158) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Webb County 7 Urban 25.8 (22.8, 28.9) 64 (24, 120) 58 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.6, 4.7)
Smith County 7 Urban 23.0 (20.5, 25.8) 110 (46, 142) 65 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.3)
McLennan County 7 Urban 24.9 (22.3, 27.7) 77 (32, 126) 71 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.9, 2.3)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 25.2 (22.7, 28.0) 72 (30, 120) 76 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.9)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 22.0 (19.9, 24.3) 122 (59, 140) 86 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.7)
Galveston County 7 Urban 22.3 (20.2, 24.5) 119 (62, 139) 91 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.8)
Bell County 7 Urban 27.8 (25.3, 30.5) 36 (18, 94) 96 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.3, 4.4)
Cameron County 7 Urban 22.7 (20.7, 24.8) 115 (55, 138) 96 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.0, 3.7)
Nueces County 7 Urban 24.5 (22.3, 26.9) 84 (37, 124) 96 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.9)
Williamson County 7 Urban 18.8 (17.3, 20.4) 146 (111, 157) 121 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 2.1)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 19.2 (17.7, 20.7) 140 (109, 156) 130 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 2.0)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 15.3 (14.1, 16.6) 164 (145, 166) 131 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 1.1)
Denton County 7 Urban 17.6 (16.4, 18.9) 154 (129, 161) 159 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.3)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 21.6 (20.2, 23.1) 127 (80, 139) 168 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.7, 3.3)
Collin County 7 Urban 16.7 (15.6, 17.9) 158 (135, 163) 178 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Travis County 7 Urban 17.0 (15.9, 18.1) 156 (135, 162) 204 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.2)
El Paso County 7 Urban 23.9 (22.4, 25.4) 96 (53, 117) 205 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.1, 2.7)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 20.5 (19.6, 21.4) 129 (105, 140) 433 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.3)
Dallas County 7 Urban 19.4 (18.6, 20.2) 138 (117, 148) 484 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.2)
Bexar County 7 Urban 25.0 (24.0, 26.0) 74 (50, 99) 505 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.3)
Harris County 7 Urban 18.3 (17.7, 18.9) 151 (128, 154) 824 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.2)
Archer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top