Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 18.2 (17.9, 18.5) N/A 2,812 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Coles County 7 Rural 24.0 (18.2, 31.1) 28 (3, 83) 13 stable stable trend -22.9 (-46.0, 4.4)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 17.5 (14.8, 20.5) 75 (42, 85) 34 falling falling trend -17.5 (-25.4, -11.3)
Livingston County 7 Rural 21.8 (16.2, 28.9) 47 (6, 84) 11 stable stable trend -16.0 (-30.5, 3.5)
Cass County 7 Rural 23.7 (14.1, 37.5) 32 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -11.5 (-34.8, 1.4)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 26.0 (23.2, 29.1) 15 (7, 49) 68 stable stable trend -6.7 (-13.2, 1.7)
Saline County 7 Rural 18.6 (12.5, 26.9) 71 (8, 85) 6 stable stable trend -3.9 (-15.3, 0.1)
Cook County 7 Urban 15.4 (15.0, 15.9) 84 (70, 85) 938 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Edgar County 7 Rural 19.0 (11.4, 30.0) 68 (5, 85) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.6, 2.5)
Kendall County 7 Urban 16.1 (13.0, 19.7) 81 (45, 85) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.7, 2.8)
Bond County 7 Urban 23.4 (14.7, 35.6) 33 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 2.8)
McLean County 7 Urban 16.8 (14.1, 19.8) 77 (43, 85) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-13.0, 3.1)
Carroll County 7 Rural 18.0 (10.2, 29.7) 74 (4, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.5)
Will County 7 Urban 16.8 (15.5, 18.2) 76 (58, 83) 134 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Douglas County 7 Rural 21.7 (14.4, 31.9) 46 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.9)
La Salle County 7 Rural 21.5 (18.2, 25.3) 50 (15, 77) 33 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
McHenry County 7 Urban 18.8 (16.9, 20.9) 69 (40, 78) 73 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.8)
DuPage County 7 Urban 15.8 (14.8, 16.9) 83 (65, 85) 180 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Lake County 7 Urban 15.9 (14.7, 17.2) 82 (63, 85) 134 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Champaign County 7 Urban 16.7 (14.2, 19.5) 78 (49, 85) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.1)
Kane County 7 Urban 16.7 (15.2, 18.3) 79 (56, 84) 97 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Randolph County 7 Rural 18.1 (12.6, 25.4) 73 (12, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.1)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 24.2 (21.7, 26.8) 26 (12, 57) 77 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.2)
Grundy County 7 Urban 22.9 (17.7, 29.3) 39 (5, 83) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.1)
Bureau County 7 Rural 21.7 (16.0, 28.9) 48 (6, 84) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.5)
Henry County 7 Urban 20.9 (15.9, 27.0) 56 (10, 84) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.9)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 19.4 (14.0, 26.3) 64 (9, 85) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.7)
Macon County 7 Urban 29.3 (25.2, 34.0) 11 (2, 41) 40 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.1)
Menard County 7 Urban 21.7 (13.5, 34.2) 45 (2, 85) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 6.4)
Monroe County 7 Urban 23.8 (17.7, 31.5) 29 (3, 83) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 5.5)
Peoria County 7 Urban 25.6 (22.6, 28.8) 18 (7, 52) 57 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.6)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 25.0 (21.7, 28.6) 23 (7, 56) 45 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.1)
Effingham County 7 Rural 19.7 (14.1, 26.7) 60 (10, 85) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.3)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 18.8 (11.8, 28.7) 70 (5, 85) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 6.0)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 23.4 (19.7, 27.6) 34 (10, 69) 31 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.2)
Adams County 7 Rural 21.1 (16.8, 26.3) 53 (11, 83) 18 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.7)
Madison County 7 Urban 25.6 (23.2, 28.3) 17 (9, 48) 86 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.3)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 18.1 (13.8, 23.6) 72 (20, 85) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.5)
Boone County 7 Urban 16.2 (12.1, 21.3) 80 (32, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.6)
Ogle County 7 Rural 21.1 (16.5, 26.8) 54 (11, 84) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.3)
Shelby County 7 Rural 30.5 (22.2, 41.3) 6 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.4)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 22.4 (18.3, 27.2) 41 (10, 77) 23 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.5)
Woodford County 7 Urban 25.2 (19.2, 32.6) 22 (3, 82) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.9)
Fulton County 7 Rural 23.0 (17.2, 30.5) 38 (4, 84) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 5.2)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 30.1 (19.3, 44.9) 8 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.8)
Franklin County 7 Rural 24.4 (18.5, 31.8) 25 (4, 80) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.3)
Knox County 7 Rural 22.2 (17.1, 28.4) 42 (6, 83) 15 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.6)
Lee County 7 Rural 23.7 (17.6, 31.4) 31 (3, 84) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 6.6)
Williamson County 7 Rural 23.1 (18.7, 28.4) 37 (7, 75) 20 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.7, 4.7)
Clay County 7 Rural 37.2 (24.9, 53.8) 2 (1, 70) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.5)
Wayne County 7 Rural 15.4 (9.2, 24.8) 85 (18, 85) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 8.1)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 21.8 (19.6, 24.2) 44 (22, 66) 79 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 4.2)
Perry County 7 Rural 34.0 (24.4, 46.4) 3 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 6.6)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 26.3 (20.8, 32.9) 14 (3, 69) 17 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 5.9)
Piatt County 7 Urban 21.5 (13.7, 32.6) 51 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.5, 8.9)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 19.1 (15.4, 23.4) 67 (21, 85) 20 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.9)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 32.5 (24.7, 42.2) 4 (1, 56) 13 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 6.7)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 19.5 (15.0, 25.0) 65 (16, 85) 14 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 6.0)
Christian County 7 Rural 29.0 (22.3, 37.1) 12 (1, 66) 14 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.6, 6.4)
Hancock County 7 Rural 22.7 (14.4, 34.4) 40 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.5, 7.7)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 21.2 (15.2, 29.1) 52 (6, 85) 9 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 6.1)
Jackson County 7 Rural 25.3 (19.4, 32.5) 19 (3, 75) 14 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.5, 6.9)
Marion County 7 Rural 23.2 (17.3, 30.5) 36 (4, 84) 12 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.6, 5.8)
Morgan County 7 Rural 29.4 (22.4, 38.0) 10 (1, 64) 13 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 8.2)
Clinton County 7 Urban 25.6 (19.5, 33.2) 16 (3, 76) 13 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.2, 7.1)
Union County 7 Rural 29.4 (20.0, 42.0) 9 (1, 83) 7 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.4, 8.7)
Mason County 7 Rural 20.4 (12.1, 33.0) 58 (3, 85) 4 stable stable trend 5.0 (-11.2, 35.9)
Greene County 7 Rural 44.4 (29.6, 64.2) 1 (1, 57) 6 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.5, 11.4)
Clark County 7 Rural 19.8 (12.1, 31.2) 61 (4, 85) 4
*
*
Crawford County 7 Rural 25.2 (17.1, 36.2) 20 (1, 84) 7
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural 31.5 (19.4, 49.0) 5 (1, 84) 5
*
*
De Witt County 7 Rural 21.0 (12.8, 32.9) 55 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Fayette County 7 Rural 19.6 (12.5, 29.5) 62 (5, 85) 5
*
*
Jasper County 7 Rural 30.4 (17.4, 49.7) 7 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Jersey County 7 Urban 19.5 (12.5, 29.2) 63 (5, 85) 5
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural 23.8 (14.7, 37.2) 30 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Rural 19.7 (11.7, 31.5) 59 (3, 85) 4
*
*
Logan County 7 Rural 25.1 (18.4, 33.8) 21 (2, 83) 10
*
*
Marshall County 7 Urban 24.7 (14.3, 40.1) 24 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Massac County 7 Urban 20.3 (11.9, 32.9) 57 (2, 85) 4
*
*
McDonough County 7 Rural 21.9 (14.7, 31.3) 43 (3, 85) 7
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural 24.2 (15.7, 36.3) 27 (2, 85) 5
*
*
Richland County 7 Rural 19.3 (11.6, 30.6) 66 (4, 85) 4
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural 21.7 (12.1, 36.3) 49 (2, 85) 3
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural 27.3 (18.0, 40.0) 13 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 23.3 (14.5, 36.2) 35 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 11:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top