Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 19.3 (18.9, 19.8) N/A 1,558 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Floyd County 2 Urban 19.4 (15.6, 24.0) 51 (9, 81) 19 falling falling trend -26.2 (-48.3, -1.8)
Owen County 2 Urban 14.5 (9.2, 22.3) 79 (16, 87) 5 falling falling trend -17.0 (-50.1, -2.6)
Daviess County 2 Rural 17.4 (11.7, 24.8) 62 (6, 87) 7 stable stable trend -16.4 (-37.5, 1.1)
Posey County 2 Urban 20.6 (13.9, 29.6) 40 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend -12.1 (-29.4, 0.4)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.8, 19.5) 85 (28, 87) 6 falling falling trend -11.4 (-36.1, -1.7)
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 14.5 (11.2, 18.4) 80 (36, 87) 14 falling falling trend -6.5 (-20.3, -1.0)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.3, 19.1) 69 (38, 83) 39 falling falling trend -3.2 (-11.8, -0.3)
Lake County 2 Urban 17.3 (15.8, 18.9) 63 (41, 78) 108 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.2, -1.3)
Miami County 2 Rural 12.6 (8.5, 18.3) 86 (39, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Wayne County 2 Rural 18.1 (14.1, 23.0) 57 (14, 85) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.9, 22.3) 71 (13, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.9, 0.8)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 16.8 (14.3, 19.6) 66 (31, 84) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Perry County 2 Rural 24.2 (15.5, 36.0) 16 (1, 86) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 3.4)
Shelby County 2 Urban 22.6 (17.2, 29.2) 24 (2, 80) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.0)
Steuben County 2 Rural 14.7 (10.3, 20.7) 78 (19, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.4, 4.2)
Jennings County 2 Rural 19.2 (13.3, 27.0) 52 (3, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 3.0)
Monroe County 2 Urban 16.7 (13.7, 20.2) 67 (27, 85) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.6)
Henry County 2 Rural 16.8 (12.7, 22.1) 65 (17, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Clinton County 2 Rural 20.7 (14.3, 28.9) 39 (2, 86) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-10.5, 2.8)
Noble County 2 Rural 16.5 (12.1, 22.0) 72 (16, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.5)
Scott County 2 Rural 22.4 (15.4, 31.7) 28 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 5.4)
Adams County 2 Rural 14.4 (9.4, 21.3) 81 (18, 87) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.9, 4.2)
Grant County 2 Rural 20.0 (15.6, 25.2) 47 (7, 83) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 16.3 (14.5, 18.3) 73 (44, 83) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.6)
Starke County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.9, 21.4) 83 (16, 87) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.4, 7.1)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 18.6 (13.7, 24.9) 54 (7, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.7)
LaGrange County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.2, 20.1) 84 (25, 87) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.2)
Whitley County 2 Urban 15.8 (10.8, 22.3) 75 (13, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 4.4)
Allen County 2 Urban 15.5 (13.9, 17.3) 76 (51, 84) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Harrison County 2 Urban 16.6 (11.9, 22.7) 68 (12, 87) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.5)
Washington County 2 Urban 20.4 (13.9, 28.9) 44 (2, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.8)
Brown County 2 Urban 18.9 (11.5, 30.2) 53 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.5, 5.6)
Marion County 2 Urban 20.6 (19.3, 21.9) 41 (23, 54) 205 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 17.9 (12.5, 24.8) 59 (8, 87) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.5, 5.5)
Cass County 2 Rural 17.4 (12.5, 23.8) 61 (10, 87) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.3)
Ripley County 2 Rural 21.8 (15.6, 29.8) 31 (2, 85) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 4.0)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 20.1 (17.5, 23.1) 46 (15, 71) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.8, 1.9)
Hancock County 2 Urban 21.0 (17.1, 25.6) 35 (7, 77) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.8)
Jasper County 2 Urban 19.5 (13.5, 27.1) 50 (3, 87) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.7)
Decatur County 2 Rural 14.3 (9.1, 21.6) 82 (15, 87) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.5)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 17.1 (15.0, 19.3) 64 (35, 81) 54 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Wabash County 2 Rural 18.1 (13.0, 25.0) 56 (6, 87) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.6)
Clark County 2 Urban 20.7 (17.5, 24.5) 38 (10, 72) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.1)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 17.8 (14.1, 22.1) 60 (17, 85) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.0)
Johnson County 2 Urban 22.4 (19.4, 25.7) 27 (8, 59) 42 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.3)
Spencer County 2 Rural 22.9 (14.7, 34.3) 20 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.6)
Delaware County 2 Urban 22.8 (19.2, 27.0) 22 (5, 64) 30 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.7)
Warrick County 2 Urban 20.8 (16.4, 25.9) 37 (4, 80) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.8)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 20.9 (16.2, 26.7) 36 (4, 83) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 24.7 (20.3, 29.8) 14 (1, 59) 24 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.3)
Howard County 2 Urban 24.6 (20.4, 29.5) 15 (2, 56) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.7)
Wells County 2 Urban 15.1 (9.6, 22.7) 77 (12, 87) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.7)
Porter County 2 Urban 19.8 (17.2, 22.7) 49 (16, 72) 44 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.7)
Vermillion County 2 Urban 21.1 (13.2, 32.5) 34 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.1, 8.2)
Boone County 2 Urban 16.0 (12.4, 20.4) 74 (26, 87) 14 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 6.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 21.5 (18.4, 25.1) 32 (8, 68) 36 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.9)
White County 2 Rural 23.5 (16.5, 32.7) 17 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 6.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 27.8 (21.8, 35.1) 4 (1, 56) 16 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 4.9)
Dubois County 2 Rural 25.7 (19.7, 33.0) 12 (1, 67) 14 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 5.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 23.4 (17.3, 31.0) 18 (1, 82) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 7.1)
Gibson County 2 Rural 26.1 (19.4, 34.5) 10 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.1, 8.5)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 20.5 (17.1, 24.3) 42 (10, 74) 29 stable stable trend 2.6 (0.0, 5.8)
Fayette County 2 Rural 20.4 (13.9, 29.3) 43 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.8, 8.0)
Fountain County 2 Rural 22.9 (14.7, 34.3) 21 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.8)
Tipton County 2 Urban 22.4 (14.2, 34.2) 26 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.3, 9.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 18.5 (13.7, 24.4) 55 (8, 86) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.1, 6.7)
Franklin County 2 Urban 20.3 (13.5, 29.6) 45 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 7.3)
Knox County 2 Rural 25.9 (19.5, 33.9) 11 (1, 70) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 7.4)
Orange County 2 Rural 28.3 (20.1, 39.0) 3 (1, 72) 8 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 8.9)
Clay County 2 Urban 30.2 (22.1, 40.4) 2 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 4.0 (0.0, 9.1)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 22.6 (19.4, 26.2) 23 (6, 60) 38 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.2, 13.9)
Greene County 2 Rural 26.3 (19.6, 34.8) 8 (1, 76) 11 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.5, 10.9)
Pike County 2 Rural 27.4 (17.1, 42.3) 6 (1, 85) 5 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.1, 11.2)
Vigo County 2 Urban 26.5 (22.4, 31.1) 7 (1, 43) 33 rising rising trend 6.1 (3.5, 15.4)
Huntington County 2 Rural 22.0 (16.0, 29.6) 30 (2, 83) 10 rising rising trend 6.7 (3.0, 15.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 32.3 (18.8, 52.3) 1 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 11.7 (6.6, 19.4) 87 (26, 87) 3
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural 22.3 (13.2, 36.6) 29 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural 19.9 (12.8, 29.7) 48 (2, 87) 5
*
*
Jay County 2 Rural 22.6 (14.7, 33.3) 25 (1, 87) 6
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural 27.5 (15.7, 45.4) 5 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban 26.3 (16.4, 40.3) 9 (1, 86) 5
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural 25.1 (16.3, 37.4) 13 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural 23.1 (13.8, 36.9) 19 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural 16.5 (10.3, 25.2) 70 (5, 87) 5
*
*
Rush County 2 Rural 21.1 (13.3, 32.3) 33 (1, 87) 5
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Urban 17.9 (11.2, 27.4) 58 (3, 87) 5
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 9:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top