Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 16.8 (16.5, 17.2) N/A 2,162 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 14.8 (12.9, 17.0) 55 (25, 67) 43 falling falling trend -9.5 (-16.6, -1.3)
Roscommon County 2 Rural 21.3 (14.2, 31.2) 11 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend -5.1 (-18.0, 1.5)
Otsego County 2 Rural 12.0 (7.3, 18.9) 68 (11, 71) 5 stable stable trend -4.4 (-23.8, 0.6)
Osceola County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.2, 20.2) 63 (8, 71) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.3, 0.2)
Leelanau County 2 Urban 11.0 (6.4, 18.4) 70 (16, 71) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.0, 2.5)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 16.1 (13.1, 19.8) 48 (11, 67) 21 stable stable trend -2.6 (-21.1, 2.1)
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 14.6 (9.5, 21.9) 57 (5, 71) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-26.0, 6.2)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 17.4 (12.8, 23.2) 35 (3, 69) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 0.5)
Macomb County 2 Urban 17.2 (16.0, 18.3) 39 (19, 51) 194 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.3, 0.0)
Wayne County 2 Urban 17.3 (16.5, 18.2) 37 (20, 48) 369 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.6)
Benzie County 2 Urban 14.8 (9.1, 23.5) 56 (3, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.6, 4.6)
Oakland County 2 Urban 16.9 (16.0, 17.8) 42 (23, 51) 281 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.3, -0.3)
Cass County 2 Urban 13.0 (9.3, 17.8) 64 (16, 71) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.6, 15.4) 67 (36, 71) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Eaton County 2 Urban 14.9 (12.1, 18.1) 54 (18, 69) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.9)
Barry County 2 Urban 18.2 (14.3, 22.9) 27 (4, 65) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-23.3, 11.1)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 15.2 (13.5, 17.0) 53 (26, 65) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Ionia County 2 Urban 14.3 (10.8, 18.6) 58 (15, 71) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.6)
Alcona County 2 Rural 16.3 (8.8, 30.7) 46 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.3, 6.1)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 15.3 (11.6, 20.0) 51 (8, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.3)
Arenac County 2 Rural 22.4 (13.7, 35.3) 8 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.2, 5.6)
Branch County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.2, 14.1) 71 (47, 71) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.2)
Montmorency County 2 Rural 17.4 (9.4, 32.3) 34 (1, 71) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.7)
Alpena County 2 Rural 22.5 (15.8, 31.4) 6 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 5.1)
Jackson County 2 Urban 17.3 (14.8, 20.2) 36 (10, 61) 36 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.8)
Monroe County 2 Urban 13.8 (11.5, 16.3) 60 (32, 70) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Kent County 2 Urban 16.4 (15.1, 17.8) 45 (23, 58) 118 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Genesee County 2 Urban 17.0 (15.4, 18.7) 40 (17, 57) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Berrien County 2 Urban 17.3 (14.7, 20.2) 38 (10, 63) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Ingham County 2 Urban 18.9 (16.7, 21.4) 19 (6, 51) 55 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.6)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 18.7 (16.0, 21.6) 23 (6, 55) 41 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.7)
Iosco County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.8, 20.5) 61 (8, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.4, 5.5)
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 13.1 (7.9, 20.8) 62 (7, 71) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.2)
Clinton County 2 Urban 16.9 (13.4, 21.0) 41 (6, 67) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1)
Mason County 2 Rural 18.0 (12.3, 25.5) 30 (2, 70) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.9)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 19.4 (16.9, 22.1) 16 (5, 52) 49 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.6)
Manistee County 2 Rural 19.0 (13.4, 26.7) 18 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.6)
Ogemaw County 2 Rural 18.8 (11.8, 28.9) 21 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.2, 6.4)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 20.8 (15.1, 28.1) 14 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.9)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 15.4 (13.5, 17.5) 50 (24, 65) 52 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.2)
Clare County 2 Rural 20.9 (15.1, 28.6) 13 (1, 65) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.7)
Emmet County 2 Rural 13.9 (9.5, 19.9) 59 (9, 71) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 7.3)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 21.2 (17.0, 26.2) 12 (1, 55) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.1)
Antrim County 2 Rural 12.6 (7.8, 20.0) 66 (9, 71) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.0, 8.5)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 16.2 (13.6, 19.3) 47 (12, 66) 28 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 4.8)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.7, 24.1) 25 (3, 67) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.6)
Allegan County 2 Rural 18.1 (15.0, 21.7) 29 (6, 61) 27 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.6)
Midland County 2 Urban 17.7 (14.1, 21.9) 32 (6, 65) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.3)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 15.2 (12.9, 17.8) 52 (21, 67) 34 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.3)
Wexford County 2 Rural 18.1 (12.8, 25.1) 28 (2, 69) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 5.8)
Gladwin County 2 Rural 17.9 (12.4, 25.5) 31 (2, 70) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 6.6)
Isabella County 2 Rural 18.5 (14.0, 24.1) 24 (2, 67) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.7)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 18.3 (15.0, 22.2) 26 (5, 62) 24 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 5.2)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 19.2 (14.9, 24.6) 17 (2, 64) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.1, 6.1)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 16.8 (13.3, 21.1) 43 (7, 67) 18 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.4)
Lake County 2 Rural 29.2 (17.9, 45.8) 1 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-5.7, 10.9)
Bay County 2 Urban 23.1 (19.5, 27.1) 5 (1, 32) 33 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 5.0)
Oceana County 2 Rural 25.5 (17.8, 35.3) 3 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 8.0)
Huron County 2 Rural 17.4 (12.1, 24.6) 33 (2, 70) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.6)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 19.9 (14.7, 26.4) 15 (1, 65) 12 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.1, 6.8)
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 23.6 (15.0, 35.5) 4 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.0, 9.9)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 21.9 (17.6, 27.0) 10 (1, 50) 19 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 6.4)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 22.5 (16.4, 30.2) 7 (1, 62) 10 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 8.9)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.8, 25.0) 22 (2, 67) 10 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.2, 9.3)
Marquette County 2 Rural 11.1 (8.2, 14.9) 69 (36, 71) 10 stable stable trend 5.3 (-2.0, 24.7)
Delta County 2 Rural 22.1 (16.1, 29.7) 9 (1, 63) 11 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.9, 10.8)
Livingston County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.4, 19.1) 44 (14, 62) 44 stable stable trend 11.1 (-0.1, 19.7)
Crawford County 2 Rural 25.8 (15.1, 41.6) 2 (1, 70) 5
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.3, 19.7) 65 (10, 71) 5
*
*
Gogebic County 2 Rural 16.1 (8.6, 28.1) 49 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural 18.9 (12.4, 28.0) 20 (1, 70) 7
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 7:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top