Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 18.9 (18.6, 19.2) N/A 2,439 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 10.7 (7.0, 15.7) 90 (64, 90) 6 falling falling trend -20.3 (-46.3, -6.5)
Wilson County 2 Rural 18.9 (15.4, 23.2) 57 (10, 88) 21 falling falling trend -14.0 (-25.0, -0.4)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 22.4 (18.7, 26.6) 25 (3, 77) 29 stable stable trend -11.1 (-26.2, 3.3)
Robeson County 2 Rural 23.8 (20.1, 27.9) 17 (1, 61) 32 falling falling trend -10.9 (-15.6, -4.8)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 20.4 (17.0, 24.5) 42 (7, 84) 27 stable stable trend -8.7 (-22.5, 0.6)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 18.3 (16.1, 20.7) 62 (26, 85) 55 stable stable trend -3.7 (-10.8, 1.7)
Wayne County 2 Urban 25.1 (21.4, 29.3) 7 (1, 52) 35 stable stable trend -2.9 (-9.7, 0.9)
Alexander County 2 Urban 16.1 (11.4, 22.3) 83 (13, 90) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 2.2)
Ashe County 2 Rural 13.8 (9.1, 20.5) 89 (23, 90) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.5)
Vance County 2 Rural 20.6 (15.4, 27.0) 40 (2, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.6)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 17.9 (15.6, 20.5) 67 (29, 86) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Person County 2 Urban 17.8 (13.1, 23.8) 69 (7, 90) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
Pitt County 2 Urban 17.0 (14.3, 20.0) 78 (30, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 17.7 (14.3, 21.7) 71 (18, 88) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.9)
Northampton County 2 Rural 17.4 (10.2, 28.3) 74 (1, 90) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.6, 4.1)
Carteret County 2 Rural 17.0 (13.5, 21.3) 77 (19, 89) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 3.8)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 19.9 (18.1, 21.8) 46 (20, 73) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.8)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 20.5 (15.9, 26.2) 41 (3, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.7)
Chatham County 2 Urban 15.6 (12.5, 19.4) 85 (31, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 3.1)
Granville County 2 Rural 26.2 (21.2, 32.1) 6 (1, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.7)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 16.3 (15.2, 17.4) 81 (60, 86) 178 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.3, 1.2)
Nash County 2 Urban 18.3 (14.9, 22.4) 61 (13, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-15.4, 6.0)
Henderson County 2 Urban 16.5 (13.8, 19.7) 80 (31, 89) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.9)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 21.4 (15.8, 28.5) 33 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Union County 2 Urban 19.5 (17.1, 22.1) 49 (18, 80) 52 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.6)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 18.6 (14.5, 23.5) 59 (8, 89) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.7)
Wake County 2 Urban 16.1 (15.1, 17.2) 82 (61, 87) 189 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.3)
Caswell County 2 Rural 17.7 (11.6, 26.3) 70 (3, 90) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 5.4)
Dare County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.0, 20.3) 87 (25, 90) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.5)
Durham County 2 Urban 18.0 (16.0, 20.2) 66 (29, 85) 62 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Craven County 2 Rural 18.1 (14.9, 21.8) 64 (18, 88) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.5)
Guilford County 2 Urban 18.4 (16.9, 20.0) 60 (36, 79) 115 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.0)
Stokes County 2 Urban 19.0 (14.4, 24.8) 56 (5, 89) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.4)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 22.3 (17.2, 28.6) 26 (1, 84) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.8)
Watauga County 2 Rural 19.2 (14.3, 25.4) 54 (3, 89) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.6)
Stanly County 2 Rural 23.8 (19.0, 29.6) 14 (1, 79) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.9)
Hertford County 2 Rural 17.4 (11.1, 26.3) 75 (2, 90) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.7, 4.6)
Rowan County 2 Urban 20.4 (17.6, 23.6) 43 (11, 79) 39 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Martin County 2 Rural 20.9 (14.3, 30.0) 36 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.6)
Bertie County 2 Rural 21.7 (13.3, 33.6) 30 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.9)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 15.9 (14.1, 18.0) 84 (53, 88) 60 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.3)
Surry County 2 Rural 22.8 (18.7, 27.7) 22 (2, 76) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.4)
Gaston County 2 Urban 21.9 (19.4, 24.6) 28 (7, 63) 61 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.2)
Iredell County 2 Urban 18.0 (15.6, 20.7) 65 (25, 86) 43 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 3.0)
Lee County 2 Rural 18.2 (14.1, 23.2) 63 (9, 89) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.6)
Moore County 2 Urban 17.6 (14.5, 21.2) 72 (22, 88) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 19.4 (12.5, 28.9) 53 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.8)
Onslow County 2 Urban 24.5 (21.1, 28.3) 10 (1, 52) 39 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.8)
Catawba County 2 Urban 19.5 (16.8, 22.5) 50 (14, 82) 41 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.9)
Johnston County 2 Urban 20.0 (17.5, 22.7) 45 (14, 80) 50 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.9)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 24.3 (20.2, 28.9) 12 (1, 64) 28 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.3)
Harnett County 2 Rural 17.5 (14.5, 20.9) 73 (22, 88) 25 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.2)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 20.6 (17.6, 24.0) 39 (7, 80) 52 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.6)
Davidson County 2 Urban 23.0 (20.1, 26.1) 21 (3, 61) 52 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.6)
Halifax County 2 Rural 19.1 (14.7, 24.7) 55 (4, 89) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.4)
Orange County 2 Urban 21.5 (18.4, 25.1) 32 (4, 75) 36 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 5.5)
Richmond County 2 Rural 20.3 (15.2, 26.7) 44 (2, 89) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.3)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 21.5 (16.4, 27.9) 31 (1, 86) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.4)
Alamance County 2 Urban 21.3 (18.6, 24.3) 34 (9, 71) 46 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.6)
Davie County 2 Urban 26.3 (20.7, 33.1) 5 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.2)
Burke County 2 Urban 23.7 (19.8, 28.3) 19 (1, 68) 29 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.6)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 19.6 (17.5, 21.9) 47 (19, 76) 66 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.4)
Scotland County 2 Rural 26.8 (20.0, 35.2) 3 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 7.7)
Duplin County 2 Rural 24.2 (18.9, 30.6) 13 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.4)
Pender County 2 Urban 23.8 (19.1, 29.4) 16 (1, 75) 19 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 5.1)
Chowan County 2 Rural 27.6 (17.2, 42.3) 2 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.5, 7.6)
Sampson County 2 Rural 21.7 (17.1, 27.2) 29 (2, 86) 16 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.3)
Haywood County 2 Rural 20.9 (16.6, 26.0) 37 (3, 86) 20 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.5, 5.7)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 22.1 (17.9, 27.0) 27 (2, 79) 22 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.7, 4.7)
Columbus County 2 Rural 23.3 (18.2, 29.6) 20 (1, 84) 16 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.1, 7.2)
McDowell County 2 Rural 26.7 (20.9, 33.8) 4 (1, 66) 16 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.6, 6.4)
Randolph County 2 Urban 24.8 (21.6, 28.3) 8 (1, 49) 47 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.8, 4.9)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 22.4 (15.9, 31.0) 24 (1, 89) 9 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 7.4)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 14.1 (9.4, 20.6) 88 (16, 90) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 8.3)
Franklin County 2 Urban 22.5 (18.1, 27.7) 23 (1, 82) 19 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.7, 7.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 17.8 (12.7, 24.4) 68 (4, 90) 9 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.6, 7.6)
Macon County 2 Rural 20.7 (15.2, 27.8) 38 (1, 88) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.0)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 16.9 (9.4, 28.5) 79 (1, 90) 4 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.4, 10.2)
Yancey County 2 Rural 17.3 (10.5, 27.3) 76 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.0, 11.1)
Bladen County 2 Rural 24.5 (17.8, 32.9) 11 (1, 85) 11 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.9, 9.0)
Hoke County 2 Urban 23.8 (17.9, 31.0) 15 (1, 84) 12 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.5, 16.6)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 18.7 (12.6, 27.0) 58 (1, 90) 8 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.8, 9.5)
Anson County 2 Urban 23.7 (16.1, 34.0) 18 (1, 89) 7
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural 21.2 (13.5, 32.2) 35 (1, 90) 5
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 24.5 (14.0, 41.0) 9 (1, 90) 4
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural 29.4 (16.6, 48.9) 1 (1, 90) 4
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban 19.5 (12.6, 29.0) 51 (1, 90) 6
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural 19.6 (11.6, 32.6) 48 (1, 90) 4
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural 19.4 (11.8, 30.4) 52 (1, 90) 6
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural 14.9 (8.8, 24.2) 86 (4, 90) 4
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 2:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top