Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Marion County 2 Urban 10.4 (9.5, 11.3) 50 (30, 53) 101 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 1.9)
Lake County 2 Urban 11.8 (10.4, 13.2) 38 (17, 49) 61 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.0)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 13.3 (11.7, 15.2) 19 (9, 43) 47 falling falling trend -2.7 (-8.1, -0.2)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 16.1 (13.7, 18.9) 9 (1, 29) 33 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.0)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 11.4 (9.6, 13.3) 41 (15, 52) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.3)
Allen County 2 Urban 7.4 (6.2, 8.8) 60 (47, 60) 28 falling falling trend -8.6 (-26.0, -1.9)
Porter County 2 Urban 13.4 (11.1, 16.1) 18 (6, 47) 25 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 4.9)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 11.9 (9.7, 14.5) 34 (9, 53) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-13.5, 5.3)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 11.3 (9.2, 13.7) 43 (14, 55) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.7)
Johnson County 2 Urban 12.3 (10.0, 15.0) 30 (7, 52) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-13.7, 2.6)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 10.9 (8.7, 13.5) 47 (14, 57) 18 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.0, -0.4)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 12.8 (10.0, 16.1) 26 (5, 53) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 5.7)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 17.8 (13.9, 22.4) 3 (1, 32) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 5.1)
Howard County 2 Urban 17.3 (13.5, 22.0) 4 (1, 37) 15 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.7, 5.9)
Vigo County 2 Urban 12.7 (9.7, 16.3) 28 (4, 54) 13 falling falling trend -9.4 (-21.8, -2.3)
Madison County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.1, 10.6) 57 (34, 60) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 0.9)
Morgan County 2 Urban 16.4 (12.4, 21.4) 8 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 6.0)
Delaware County 2 Urban 10.4 (7.8, 13.6) 49 (13, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.4, -0.3)
Clark County 2 Urban 8.4 (6.3, 11.0) 54 (31, 60) 11 falling falling trend -17.8 (-38.2, -2.4)
Hancock County 2 Urban 13.1 (9.8, 17.1) 23 (3, 55) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.7)
Monroe County 2 Urban 8.3 (6.1, 10.9) 55 (31, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-19.0, -0.6)
Wayne County 2 Rural 13.0 (9.4, 17.6) 24 (2, 56) 9 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 8.5)
Warrick County 2 Urban 12.2 (8.7, 16.6) 33 (3, 58) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-24.3, 5.5)
Boone County 2 Urban 11.3 (8.0, 15.4) 44 (8, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 4.6)
Floyd County 2 Urban 7.6 (5.3, 10.6) 59 (31, 60) 7 falling falling trend -7.4 (-21.4, -2.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.2, 20.7) 13 (1, 57) 7
*
*
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 8.8 (6.1, 12.4) 52 (18, 60) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.9, 7.6)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 18.2 (12.4, 25.6) 1 (1, 49) 7
*
*
Dearborn County 2 Urban 12.3 (8.3, 17.5) 32 (2, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.8)
Dubois County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.0, 18.9) 20 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.4)
Henry County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.3, 17.5) 31 (2, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 6.5)
Marshall County 2 Rural 13.2 (8.8, 19.0) 22 (1, 59) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 12.9 (8.5, 18.8) 25 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 8.8)
Clinton County 2 Rural 17.0 (11.2, 24.7) 5 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural 7.8 (5.1, 11.4) 58 (24, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 2.9)
Shelby County 2 Urban 11.8 (7.7, 17.4) 36 (3, 60) 6 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.1, 12.8)
Jasper County 2 Urban 15.1 (9.6, 22.6) 10 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.5, 17.8) 37 (2, 60) 5 stable stable trend -5.8 (-32.1, 1.9)
Gibson County 2 Rural 12.3 (7.7, 18.7) 29 (2, 60) 5
*
*
Jennings County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.3, 22.6) 12 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.9, 11.0)
Knox County 2 Rural 12.7 (7.9, 19.4) 27 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Cass County 2 Rural 11.3 (7.0, 17.4) 42 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Miami County 2 Rural 11.1 (6.9, 16.9) 45 (3, 60) 5 falling falling trend -6.7 (-21.4, -1.5)
Noble County 2 Rural 9.8 (6.1, 14.9) 51 (8, 60) 5
*
*
Harrison County 2 Urban 11.4 (7.0, 17.5) 40 (2, 60) 4
*
*
White County 2 Rural 16.5 (10.0, 25.6) 7 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Decatur County 2 Rural 14.4 (8.6, 22.5) 14 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.4, 4.2)
Daviess County 2 Rural 13.2 (7.9, 20.6) 21 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Ripley County 2 Rural 10.7 (6.3, 17.2) 48 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.8)
Owen County 2 Urban 14.9 (8.3, 24.5) 11 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.0, 22.7) 16 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban 11.1 (6.3, 18.2) 46 (2, 60) 3 falling falling trend -7.8 (-21.7, -1.7)
Fountain County 2 Rural 18.1 (10.1, 29.9) 2 (1, 60) 3 rising rising trend 5.7 (0.9, 11.7)
Franklin County 2 Urban 13.7 (7.7, 22.5) 17 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 11.7 (6.6, 18.9) 39 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural 11.9 (6.6, 19.7) 35 (1, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.7, 8.4)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 14.1 (8.0, 23.2) 15 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 16.6 (9.3, 27.3) 6 (1, 60) 3
*
*
LaGrange County 2 Rural 8.1 (4.5, 13.4) 56 (12, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 6.4)
Whitley County 2 Urban 8.6 (4.8, 14.3) 53 (8, 60) 3
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huntington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steuben County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 5:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top