Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 11.1 (10.9, 11.4) | N/A | 1,231 | falling | -4.5 (-6.3, -2.8) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 13.3 (13.2, 13.3) | N/A | 44,551 | falling | -2.3 (-3.4, -1.5) |
Person County 6 | 17.2 (12.0, 23.9) | 1 (1, 50) | 8 |
|
|
New Hanover County 6 | 17.0 (14.7, 19.6) | 2 (1, 18) | 41 | falling | -7.8 (-13.4, -3.1) |
Moore County 6 | 16.7 (13.1, 20.9) | 3 (1, 32) | 17 | stable | -0.7 (-18.3, 4.1) |
Iredell County 6 | 16.5 (13.9, 19.4) | 4 (1, 24) | 31 | falling | -5.3 (-11.1, -1.5) |
Brunswick County 6 | 16.1 (12.9, 19.8) | 5 (1, 33) | 26 | falling | -4.8 (-12.7, -0.5) |
Onslow County 6 | 15.9 (13.1, 19.0) | 6 (1, 28) | 26 | falling | -5.7 (-8.6, -3.5) |
Sampson County 6 | 15.1 (11.2, 19.9) | 7 (1, 52) | 11 | stable | 3.1 (-0.6, 8.0) |
Durham County 6 | 14.4 (12.6, 16.3) | 8 (2, 30) | 48 | falling | -7.9 (-17.7, -1.1) |
Stanly County 6 | 14.3 (10.2, 19.3) | 9 (1, 58) | 9 | stable | 1.4 (-19.5, 11.3) |
Rowan County 6 | 14.2 (11.5, 17.3) | 10 (1, 43) | 22 | falling | -10.5 (-20.5, -5.2) |
Chatham County 6 | 13.8 (10.1, 18.3) | 11 (1, 57) | 12 | rising | 5.3 (1.2, 10.8) |
Bladen County 6 | 13.6 (8.3, 21.0) | 12 (1, 67) | 5 | stable | 5.5 (-0.2, 13.0) |
Davie County 6 | 13.6 (8.8, 20.1) | 13 (1, 66) | 6 | stable | 2.4 (-4.0, 10.4) |
Granville County 6 | 13.5 (9.6, 18.4) | 14 (1, 61) | 9 | rising | 5.1 (0.2, 11.9) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 13.4 (11.3, 15.8) | 15 (3, 42) | 30 | falling | -5.4 (-16.7, -1.2) |
Union County 6 | 13.4 (11.4, 15.7) | 16 (3, 41) | 33 | rising | 3.7 (1.9, 6.2) |
Duplin County 6 | 13.0 (9.2, 18.0) | 17 (1, 61) | 8 | falling | -6.8 (-17.9, -0.5) |
Pender County 6 | 12.7 (9.0, 17.5) | 18 (1, 63) | 8 | falling | -12.2 (-22.9, -6.2) |
Wake County 6 | 12.5 (11.6, 13.5) | 19 (10, 33) | 141 | stable | 0.5 (-1.1, 1.8) |
Lincoln County 6 | 12.5 (9.3, 16.4) | 20 (2, 60) | 11 | stable | -0.3 (-5.6, 2.0) |
Alamance County 6 | 12.3 (10.1, 14.8) | 21 (5, 54) | 23 | stable | 1.8 (-1.2, 5.4) |
Columbus County 6 | 12.2 (8.4, 17.1) | 22 (1, 65) | 7 | stable | 2.3 (-2.7, 8.6) |
Orange County 6 | 12.2 (9.7, 15.1) | 23 (5, 57) | 18 | stable | 1.7 (-4.6, 4.1) |
Cumberland County 6 | 11.7 (10.0, 13.5) | 24 (10, 52) | 36 | falling | -12.0 (-19.4, -1.5) |
Watauga County 6 | 11.5 (7.6, 16.8) | 25 (1, 67) | 6 | stable | -2.0 (-7.4, 3.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | 11.3 (7.8, 15.7) | 26 (2, 66) | 8 | stable | 0.8 (-4.9, 6.9) |
Alexander County 6 | 11.3 (6.9, 17.4) | 27 (1, 67) | 5 |
|
|
Wayne County 6 | 11.2 (8.7, 14.3) | 28 (6, 62) | 15 | stable | -3.2 (-18.8, 2.8) |
Cherokee County 6 | 11.0 (6.0, 18.5) | 29 (1, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Haywood County 6 | 10.9 (7.5, 15.4) | 30 (3, 67) | 8 | stable | 1.7 (-3.0, 6.9) |
Yadkin County 6 | 10.8 (6.5, 16.8) | 31 (1, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Anson County 6 | 10.8 (5.9, 18.1) | 32 (1, 67) | 3 |
|
|
Carteret County 6 | 10.7 (7.4, 15.0) | 33 (4, 66) | 8 | falling | -27.5 (-46.3, -2.5) |
Robeson County 6 | 10.6 (8.2, 13.6) | 34 (9, 64) | 14 | rising | 7.7 (5.2, 11.4) |
Burke County 6 | 10.6 (7.8, 14.2) | 35 (6, 66) | 10 | stable | 1.8 (-2.2, 6.0) |
Harnett County 6 | 10.6 (8.2, 13.3) | 36 (10, 65) | 15 | stable | 1.6 (-1.5, 5.5) |
Lenoir County 6 | 10.5 (7.0, 15.2) | 37 (3, 67) | 6 | stable | 2.6 (-4.2, 10.8) |
Gaston County 6 | 10.5 (8.7, 12.5) | 38 (14, 62) | 26 | stable | -2.7 (-13.0, 1.1) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 10.5 (9.6, 11.4) | 39 (24, 53) | 118 | stable | -0.1 (-12.2, 2.6) |
Buncombe County 6 | 10.4 (8.7, 12.2) | 40 (16, 60) | 31 | stable | -1.3 (-8.3, 1.4) |
Pitt County 6 | 10.3 (8.2, 12.8) | 41 (12, 64) | 17 | stable | -19.5 (-40.3, 0.0) |
Stokes County 6 | 10.2 (6.3, 15.6) | 42 (2, 67) | 5 | stable | 4.9 (-0.3, 12.2) |
Hoke County 6 | 10.1 (6.7, 14.7) | 43 (4, 67) | 6 |
|
|
Johnston County 6 | 10.0 (8.2, 12.2) | 44 (16, 63) | 21 | stable | -0.3 (-1.9, 1.6) |
Macon County 6 | 10.0 (5.7, 16.3) | 45 (1, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Davidson County 6 | 9.9 (7.8, 12.3) | 46 (14, 65) | 18 | stable | -0.7 (-22.3, 6.2) |
Rockingham County 6 | 9.7 (7.1, 13.1) | 47 (10, 67) | 10 | rising | 3.5 (0.5, 7.0) |
Guilford County 6 | 9.7 (8.6, 11.0) | 48 (25, 61) | 54 | falling | -4.0 (-5.9, -2.6) |
Randolph County 6 | 9.5 (7.4, 12.0) | 49 (16, 66) | 15 | falling | -11.8 (-26.1, -3.7) |
Rutherford County 6 | 9.3 (6.3, 13.3) | 50 (8, 67) | 7 | stable | -25.8 (-58.8, 6.4) |
Forsyth County 6 | 9.2 (7.8, 10.6) | 51 (28, 64) | 37 | stable | -2.6 (-24.4, 0.7) |
McDowell County 6 | 9.1 (5.8, 13.8) | 52 (7, 67) | 5 | stable | -3.4 (-7.2, 0.4) |
Beaufort County 6 | 9.1 (5.4, 14.3) | 53 (5, 67) | 4 | stable | 0.2 (-5.0, 5.4) |
Franklin County 6 | 9.1 (6.2, 12.9) | 54 (11, 67) | 7 | stable | 3.5 (-0.6, 8.5) |
Craven County 6 | 9.0 (6.5, 12.1) | 55 (14, 67) | 10 | stable | -2.7 (-24.9, 2.8) |
Cleveland County 6 | 8.9 (6.4, 11.9) | 56 (17, 67) | 10 | falling | -4.1 (-10.3, -0.7) |
Lee County 6 | 8.8 (5.8, 12.8) | 57 (9, 67) | 6 |
|
|
Richmond County 6 | 8.7 (5.3, 13.5) | 58 (8, 67) | 4 | stable | 3.1 (-4.1, 11.7) |
Catawba County 6 | 8.6 (6.7, 10.9) | 59 (24, 67) | 15 | falling | -14.6 (-32.2, -5.4) |
Surry County 6 | 8.6 (5.9, 12.1) | 60 (13, 67) | 7 | stable | -0.3 (-6.7, 6.4) |
Wilson County 6 | 8.5 (6.0, 11.8) | 61 (15, 67) | 8 | stable | 2.2 (-1.6, 6.7) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 8.4 (4.8, 13.5) | 62 (5, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Halifax County 6 | 8.0 (4.8, 12.5) | 63 (12, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Nash County 6 | 7.3 (5.1, 10.2) | 64 (27, 67) | 7 | stable | 2.6 (-1.3, 7.0) |
Henderson County 6 | 7.2 (5.3, 9.5) | 65 (34, 67) | 12 | stable | -0.4 (-5.7, 5.5) |
Caldwell County 6 | 6.9 (4.6, 10.0) | 66 (29, 67) | 7 |
|
|
Transylvania County 6 | 6.4 (3.6, 11.1) | 67 (19, 67) | 4 | falling | -5.9 (-10.9, -1.1) |
Alleghany County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ashe County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Avery County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bertie County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Camden County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Caswell County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chowan County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currituck County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dare County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Edgecombe County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gates County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Graham County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Greene County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hertford County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jones County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Martin County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Montgomery County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Northampton County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pamlico County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquimans County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Scotland County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Swain County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyrrell County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vance County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warren County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yancey County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/15/2024 5:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Bertie, Camden, Caswell, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Dare, Edgecombe, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hertford, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Perquimans, Polk, Scotland, Swain, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Yancey
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/15/2024 5:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Bertie, Camden, Caswell, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Dare, Edgecombe, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hertford, Hyde, Jackson, Jones, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Montgomery, Northampton, Pamlico, Perquimans, Polk, Scotland, Swain, Tyrrell, Vance, Warren, Washington, Yancey
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.