Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 8.6 (8.2, 8.9) N/A 463 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.4, -2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 45,453 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Autauga County 2 Urban 9.6 (6.3, 13.9) 15 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 5.1)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.8, 8.9) 27 (13, 34) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.6)
Blount County 2 Urban 12.1 (8.5, 16.6) 5 (1, 29) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 8.8)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.3, 16.4) 2 (1, 19) 16 falling falling trend -23.1 (-38.4, -7.4)
Chilton County 2 Urban 8.6 (5.3, 13.2) 21 (2, 35) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.5, 4.9)
Coffee County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.6, 13.2) 19 (2, 35) 5
*
*
Colbert County 2 Urban 6.7 (4.1, 10.4) 32 (7, 35) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.4, 8.0)
Covington County 2 Rural 8.2 (4.5, 13.7) 22 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Cullman County 2 Rural 7.3 (5.0, 10.2) 25 (7, 35) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Dale County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.7, 17.6) 6 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural 6.8 (3.8, 11.4) 31 (5, 35) 3
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural 5.8 (3.5, 9.0) 34 (12, 35) 4
*
*
Elmore County 2 Urban 8.1 (5.7, 11.1) 24 (5, 35) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.3)
Etowah County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.3, 11.6) 20 (4, 34) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-15.9, 2.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 9.5 (5.3, 15.6) 16 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Houston County 2 Urban 9.9 (7.4, 13.1) 12 (2, 31) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 5.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 6.9 (4.1, 10.8) 30 (6, 35) 4 falling falling trend -6.6 (-23.0, -2.0)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 9.3 (8.2, 10.4) 18 (8, 25) 65 falling falling trend -10.3 (-18.5, -0.3)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.2, 14.5) 7 (1, 29) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.3)
Lee County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.0, 8.7) 33 (14, 35) 11 falling falling trend -17.4 (-31.4, -9.9)
Limestone County 2 Urban 10.2 (7.7, 13.3) 10 (2, 30) 12 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.8)
Madison County 2 Urban 9.9 (8.6, 11.4) 13 (5, 24) 41 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 7.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 11.0 (8.3, 14.3) 8 (1, 28) 12 falling falling trend -13.9 (-31.7, -4.3)
Mobile County 2 Urban 7.2 (6.1, 8.5) 28 (17, 34) 32 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.5, 0.4)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.6, 8.8) 29 (15, 34) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 10.1 (7.7, 13.0) 11 (2, 31) 13 stable stable trend -16.0 (-29.9, 1.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 12.4 (7.0, 20.7) 4 (1, 34) 3 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.0, 10.6)
Russell County 2 Urban 7.3 (4.5, 11.1) 26 (5, 35) 4
*
*
Shelby County 2 Urban 9.8 (8.0, 11.8) 14 (4, 27) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.6)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 8.2 (5.8, 11.3) 23 (4, 34) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Talladega County 2 Rural 12.9 (9.7, 17.0) 3 (1, 23) 12 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.5, 7.5)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 10.6 (6.6, 16.1) 9 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.5)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 4.4 (3.2, 5.8) 35 (30, 35) 10 falling falling trend -7.8 (-22.7, -2.6)
Walker County 2 Urban 9.3 (6.3, 13.2) 17 (2, 34) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.0)
Winston County 2 Rural 16.3 (9.5, 25.9) 1 (1, 30) 4
*
*
Barbour County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Escambia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 8:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top