Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 11.3 (11.0, 11.6) N/A 1,215 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.0, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 45,453 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 52 (48, 52) 10 falling falling trend -15.2 (-31.8, -6.7)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 8.5 (5.2, 13.2) 47 (6, 52) 5 falling falling trend -7.3 (-30.4, -2.6)
Oakland County 2 Urban 11.9 (11.0, 12.7) 19 (9, 31) 166 falling falling trend -6.9 (-13.3, -1.6)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.5, 16.4) 12 (2, 46) 13 falling falling trend -6.5 (-21.3, -1.7)
Jackson County 2 Urban 8.9 (7.0, 11.3) 42 (15, 51) 16 falling falling trend -6.4 (-18.3, -1.5)
Macomb County 2 Urban 13.9 (12.8, 15.0) 8 (3, 19) 134 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.8, -4.3)
Genesee County 2 Urban 9.1 (7.9, 10.6) 41 (23, 50) 40 falling falling trend -5.1 (-14.7, -1.8)
Clinton County 2 Urban 12.4 (9.1, 16.5) 16 (2, 48) 10 falling falling trend -4.9 (-15.3, -1.4)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 10.1 (6.0, 15.8) 34 (2, 52) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-28.8, -0.1)
Livingston County 2 Urban 11.2 (9.3, 13.6) 23 (7, 45) 26 stable stable trend -3.0 (-10.1, 0.6)
Marquette County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.5, 11.1) 51 (15, 52) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.3, 0.5)
Isabella County 2 Rural 13.6 (9.6, 18.7) 9 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-14.2, 1.8)
Wayne County 2 Urban 12.6 (11.8, 13.3) 13 (7, 25) 236 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.5, -0.6)
Ingham County 2 Urban 11.0 (9.3, 13.0) 29 (8, 45) 31 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 0.0)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 9.2 (6.7, 12.3) 40 (10, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 2.0)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 11.1 (9.6, 12.7) 25 (9, 42) 42 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.4, 0.2)
Allegan County 2 Rural 10.2 (7.8, 13.1) 33 (8, 50) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-22.6, 3.4)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 12.5 (8.9, 16.9) 15 (2, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.4, 1.7)
Monroe County 2 Urban 11.5 (9.2, 14.2) 22 (5, 46) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-13.0, 3.9)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.7, 11.5) 50 (12, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.1)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 12.8 (10.4, 15.6) 10 (2, 39) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.2)
Wexford County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.4, 17.7) 26 (1, 52) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.8, 5.8)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 10.1 (5.8, 16.2) 35 (2, 52) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.3, 5.5)
Kent County 2 Urban 11.0 (9.9, 12.2) 28 (12, 40) 73 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.9, 1.5)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 9.9 (8.2, 11.8) 36 (14, 49) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.0)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 9.8 (5.9, 15.3) 37 (3, 52) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 5.1)
Berrien County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.6, 11.0) 45 (17, 51) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.3)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 9.3 (7.1, 11.9) 39 (11, 51) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.8)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 11.2 (8.4, 14.7) 24 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 8.5 (5.8, 12.2) 46 (10, 52) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.2, 7.2)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 10.8 (7.0, 16.0) 30 (2, 51) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.0)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 11.6 (9.9, 13.6) 20 (6, 42) 34 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 5.0)
Bay County 2 Urban 12.5 (9.5, 16.1) 14 (2, 46) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.1)
Eaton County 2 Urban 12.7 (9.9, 16.0) 11 (2, 44) 16 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.0)
Alpena County 2 Rural 18.0 (11.3, 27.1) 2 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 8.3)
Emmet County 2 Rural 15.5 (10.3, 22.5) 4 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.5, 8.7)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.5, 13.2) 43 (6, 52) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (0.0, 6.6)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 10.3 (7.2, 14.4) 32 (4, 51) 7 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.2, 7.7)
Cass County 2 Urban 8.6 (5.3, 13.1) 44 (6, 52) 5 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.4, 10.8)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 10.5 (8.5, 12.9) 31 (8, 48) 20 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.1, 6.4)
Midland County 2 Urban 17.1 (13.3, 21.6) 3 (1, 24) 15 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.7, 8.1)
Barry County 2 Urban 11.0 (7.6, 15.5) 27 (3, 51) 7 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.7, 10.3)
Branch County 2 Rural 8.3 (5.0, 13.1) 48 (7, 52) 4
*
*
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 14.7 (8.2, 24.0) 5 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 14.6 (8.1, 24.1) 7 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Clare County 2 Rural 14.6 (9.1, 22.3) 6 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Gladwin County 2 Rural 19.6 (12.5, 29.4) 1 (1, 41) 6
*
*
Huron County 2 Rural 9.6 (5.1, 16.2) 38 (2, 52) 3
*
*
Ionia County 2 Urban 7.6 (4.9, 11.1) 49 (14, 52) 5
*
*
Manistee County 2 Rural 12.0 (6.5, 20.3) 18 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Mason County 2 Rural 11.5 (6.4, 19.0) 21 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Newaygo County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.3, 17.6) 17 (1, 50) 7
*
*
Alcona County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 10:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top