Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 11.0 (10.7, 11.3) N/A 1,237 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 45,453 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Rowan County 2 Urban 10.6 (8.4, 13.3) 37 (8, 63) 17 falling falling trend -12.0 (-20.4, -3.8)
Pitt County 2 Urban 8.5 (6.5, 10.8) 56 (26, 68) 14 falling falling trend -11.6 (-30.5, -1.1)
Catawba County 2 Urban 7.5 (5.7, 9.7) 65 (35, 68) 13 falling falling trend -10.4 (-19.1, -5.7)
Durham County 2 Urban 13.5 (11.8, 15.3) 13 (3, 35) 48 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.2, -3.4)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.7, 18.4) 2 (1, 23) 39 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.4, -1.7)
Iredell County 2 Urban 13.1 (10.9, 15.6) 18 (2, 46) 26 falling falling trend -6.6 (-12.1, -3.1)
Duplin County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.3, 20.6) 5 (1, 59) 8 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.3, -1.9)
Onslow County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.6, 17.1) 7 (1, 39) 25 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.9, -4.3)
Pender County 2 Urban 17.8 (13.3, 23.4) 1 (1, 36) 11 falling falling trend -5.6 (-13.2, -1.5)
Randolph County 2 Urban 9.3 (7.2, 11.8) 49 (18, 67) 15 falling falling trend -5.5 (-13.0, -1.6)
Carteret County 2 Rural 9.8 (6.6, 13.9) 45 (5, 68) 8 stable stable trend -4.9 (-28.4, 2.5)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 7.5 (4.1, 12.9) 66 (9, 68) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.7, -0.7)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 13.8 (11.7, 16.2) 10 (2, 39) 32 falling falling trend -3.6 (-9.9, -0.8)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 8.3 (5.4, 12.1) 60 (16, 68) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-27.3, 0.9)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 9.7 (7.1, 12.9) 46 (9, 67) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.2, -0.7)
Guilford County 2 Urban 10.1 (9.0, 11.4) 42 (23, 58) 57 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.9)
Gaston County 2 Urban 9.8 (8.1, 11.8) 44 (19, 65) 25 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.9, -0.3)
McDowell County 2 Rural 8.7 (5.4, 13.4) 53 (7, 68) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.2, 0.1)
Moore County 2 Urban 13.6 (10.5, 17.3) 12 (1, 52) 15 stable stable trend -2.9 (-17.2, 0.9)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 15.5 (12.4, 19.1) 3 (1, 37) 26 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.4, -0.1)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 8.2 (6.9, 9.5) 61 (39, 67) 34 falling falling trend -2.7 (-14.2, -0.6)
Watauga County 2 Rural 8.6 (5.2, 13.5) 55 (4, 68) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.7, 2.1)
Wilson County 2 Rural 6.6 (4.4, 9.7) 68 (33, 68) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-26.3, 1.3)
Orange County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.0, 15.5) 23 (2, 55) 19 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.6, 2.0)
Wayne County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.4, 14.0) 34 (6, 65) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-11.1, 1.8)
Craven County 2 Rural 8.4 (6.0, 11.4) 58 (18, 68) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-16.4, 1.7)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 10.7 (9.1, 12.5) 36 (14, 57) 34 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 0.0)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 10.6 (9.0, 12.4) 38 (16, 59) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 0.5)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 12.5 (9.5, 16.3) 24 (1, 62) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.7, 1.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 10.4 (8.4, 12.7) 40 (12, 63) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-14.3, 2.7)
Henderson County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.0, 10.7) 62 (25, 68) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 3.2)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 10.2 (9.4, 11.1) 41 (26, 54) 116 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.6, 1.4)
Surry County 2 Rural 9.4 (6.6, 13.2) 48 (6, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.3)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 9.0 (6.0, 13.1) 50 (8, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.6, 4.8)
Wake County 2 Urban 13.1 (12.2, 14.1) 16 (7, 30) 155 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 7.9 (4.6, 12.7) 63 (10, 68) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 4.0)
Alamance County 2 Urban 11.0 (9.0, 13.4) 33 (8, 60) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 4.1)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 11.5 (7.2, 17.4) 29 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.1)
Nash County 2 Urban 7.8 (5.5, 10.7) 64 (26, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.3)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 10.9 (7.2, 15.7) 35 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.4, 6.7)
Haywood County 2 Rural 12.2 (8.6, 16.9) 27 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.8)
Burke County 2 Urban 13.0 (9.8, 16.9) 20 (1, 59) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.5)
Richmond County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.0, 16.6) 32 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.3, 8.8)
Harnett County 2 Rural 11.3 (8.9, 14.2) 31 (5, 62) 16 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 5.3)
Sampson County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.1, 18.8) 8 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 6.7)
Davie County 2 Urban 12.4 (7.9, 18.3) 25 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.2, 7.7)
Columbus County 2 Rural 12.7 (8.8, 17.9) 22 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 7.8)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 9.9 (7.2, 13.2) 43 (8, 67) 11 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.2, 5.5)
Union County 2 Urban 13.9 (11.9, 16.3) 9 (1, 37) 34 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 5.3)
Chatham County 2 Urban 13.1 (9.7, 17.3) 17 (1, 59) 12 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 7.3)
Granville County 2 Rural 12.9 (9.3, 17.5) 21 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 9.1)
Stokes County 2 Urban 9.0 (5.4, 14.1) 51 (4, 68) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.9, 9.2)
Stanly County 2 Rural 15.4 (11.2, 20.6) 4 (1, 50) 10 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 7.9)
Franklin County 2 Urban 12.3 (9.0, 16.5) 26 (1, 62) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.8, 7.9)
Bladen County 2 Rural 13.0 (7.6, 20.7) 19 (1, 68) 4 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.5, 10.7)
Robeson County 2 Rural 13.1 (10.3, 16.5) 15 (1, 55) 15 rising rising trend 7.9 (5.7, 10.9)
Johnston County 2 Urban 11.9 (9.9, 14.1) 28 (6, 53) 27 rising rising trend 12.7 (2.7, 19.9)
Anson County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.4, 23.5) 6 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural 9.6 (5.2, 16.4) 47 (2, 68) 3
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban 8.4 (5.8, 11.8) 57 (17, 68) 8
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural 11.3 (6.1, 19.3) 30 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Halifax County 2 Rural 8.9 (5.4, 13.7) 52 (6, 68) 5
*
*
Hoke County 2 Urban 7.5 (4.6, 11.6) 67 (18, 68) 4
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural 8.4 (5.5, 12.3) 59 (12, 68) 6
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural 8.6 (5.1, 13.9) 54 (5, 68) 5
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 13.2 (7.4, 21.6) 14 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Person County 2 Urban 10.5 (6.6, 15.9) 39 (2, 68) 5
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban 13.8 (8.7, 20.8) 11 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Alexander County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 5:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top